Under Drive Crank Pulley For KA24DE?

ONLY for ADVANCED technical discussion about the 240sx!
Mr240dude
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 3:58 pm
Car: 240sx se hatch.

Post

What's up guys, so I was doing some research on under drive crank pulleys and was wondering if they yield any positive results. I've read that they are much lighter at the crank and decrease parisitic drag. Is it worth investing in one? I read that the accessory pulleys are not worth it but the under drive is worth it more. I've also read that they increase redline speeds as well. Are there any known issues to installing an aftermarket under drive pulley? Would it effect my accessories in anyway? Here's the one I was looking at b vision motor sports...


http://www.ebay.com/itm/390340225654?ss ... 1423.l2649


User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

do it, it'll be awesome.

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

What does the rest of your setup look like? An underdrive pulley isn't going to get you anything that you will notice IMO. The problem with cheap underdrive crank pulleys is if they aren't balanced well, then it could cause premature wear on stuff. Maybe minimal wear, but its unnecessary.

Mr240dude
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 3:58 pm
Car: 240sx se hatch.

Post

Well I have intake,performance spark plugs,header,test pipe and 3 inch exhaust. This once seems convincingly good quality. So you think it's worth it?

User avatar
Razi
Posts: 28373
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am
Car: Moo

Post

Is this a street car?
Why do you need an underdrive pulley?
It's going to underdrive all your accessories, and most importantly, your water pump and alternator.

Plus, it's also solid aluminum, so it can't dampen the harmonics like the stock pulley, which on a motor like the KA (Motor with a half-balanced crank), is important for longevity.

Mr240dude
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 3:58 pm
Car: 240sx se hatch.

Post

Hey krash your post deleted for some reason can you post it again? Razi yeah it's a street car, I just wanted to keep it all motor since the turbo idea isn't realistic right now. So you're saying this isn't a good idea?

User avatar
Razi
Posts: 28373
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 9:52 am
Car: Moo

Post

For the minimal gains (If there even is any), it isn't worth it.
If you want something that'll make a big difference, buy an aluminum driveshaft. I think they're about 10 lbs lighter than stock. It's very costly though.
It's very hard to make any extra power with just N/A bolt-ons on a KA.

Mr240dude
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 3:58 pm
Car: 240sx se hatch.

Post

Maybe I'll look into the drive shaft. Well I've seen a lot success stories with people running NA yielding hp in the 160's to the wheels. Extensive engine work perhaps?

User avatar
asoomal
Posts: 2374
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:45 pm
Car: 2001 Subaru Impreza L 5MT (Daily)
1992 Nissan 240SX SE 5MT w/HICAS (Being restored)
Location: Canada

Post

The only crank pulley that should be on is the OEM one or the ATI Damper.

You will chew through front main seals with aluminum under drive pulleys.

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

Weird, I can still see my post.

Like Razi said, you'll gain a lot more from doing an aluminum driveshaft. Its really hard to squeeze N/A power out of a KA. There is a member on here that spent thousands of dollars and a lot of time on his N/A KA, he's making about 200whp. It is an awesome accomplishment, but if you don't have the funds I wouldn't bother with it.

Mr240dude
Posts: 192
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 3:58 pm
Car: 240sx se hatch.

Post

On the contrary I'm content with a little kick to my DD 240. I'm not looking for 200 hp right now. I'm satisfied with full bolt ons and maybe some cams since I've also heard those can add some ponies too. Turbo is cool and all but it's not realistic as of now.

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

IMO, Turbo is the only way to go with the KA. Cost:Power ratio is a whole heck of a lot better with ka-t than it is for an N/A KA. Razi has probably the best DD ka-t setup I have seen and in reality its not all that more expensive than doing an SR swap.

Anyway, if you're just looking for some pep, try an aluminum drive shaft or lightweight flywheel. Between the two, I'd probably choose the driveshaft first. Give the car a nice tune up, seafoam it, and it should run very nicely.

User avatar
dickie
Posts: 16559
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 7:55 am
Car: Killer Turtle

Post

krash is right. f*** throwing bolt ons at a stock KA. unless you're bolting on a turbo. you could easily spend a few grand and you'll still be slow. performance spark plugs? no such thing man. intake probably isn't doing much for you, might even be hurting you.

don't even bother with the driveline stuff, that's money better spent elsewhere.

sounds like you need to spend some time getting knowledgified OP. do some lurking and learn from others' experiences; that's the primary benefit of forum cruising. i have a car that responds waaaay better to lightening/bolt-ons than a 240sx. i'd drive right past you in pretty much any situation with your current and planned mods and i'm still painfully slow by modern standards. if i had the foresight, i'd have saved my pennies for a turbo.

User avatar
dickie
Posts: 16559
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 7:55 am
Car: Killer Turtle

Post

also: 240sx section.

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

yea, didn't realize it was going to get all profound up in the hizzy. Moved.

You still working on the X8 d!ck?

User avatar
krash
Posts: 4836
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 10:43 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx Convertible
Location: Memphis, TN
Contact:

Post

Also want to add, things like pulleys, lightweight flywheels, driveshafts, etc DO NOT INCREASE power. They just free up lost power.

User avatar
dickie
Posts: 16559
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 7:55 am
Car: Killer Turtle

Post

yeah, getting it back on the road after a clutch fork mishap. the miata has actually been getting a lot more attention lately though.

liquid_cool
Posts: 1700
Joined: Sat Jul 05, 2008 3:02 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 240SX KA24DE-T swap 8.6:1cr, duelsprings, ti retainers,supertech pistons, K1 H-beems balanced internals ect ect

Post

never use an underdrive pully with the ka24de unless you have a fully balanced crank..the oem crank is what they call half balanced..the oem damper helps save the all important bearings from the devistatingly destructive forces of harmonic vibrations the ka24de is famos for...save the coin and use it where its most benificial..good luck

User avatar
CCurate
Posts: 129
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 2:38 pm
Car: 91 240sx Hatch

Post

I have say to forgo the pulley. i have had one on my car for like 7yrs.its ok but you will DEF notice the vibrations from the engine. I need to replace it. plus noting to at least absorb a little vibration. I also have the aluminum driveshaft and flywheel. best purchase made next to my BRM exhaust. If your gonna have someone install the flywheel then i would by both before this way u can save on install as the driveshaft will be taken out anyway.

RiverCitySX
Posts: 71
Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:27 am
Car: 1993 Nissan 240sx KA-T
Location: Richmond,VA

Post

I had an S14 N/A, dynoed at 170whp. Only mods were injen cold air intake
meagan racing header and 3" straight pipe exhaust
pulsestar plugs
driveshaft shop aluminum one piece drive shaft
advanced base timing to 24 degree BTDC
I was pretty happy with it.
Then I joined the dark side lol


Return to “240SX Technical Forum”