qship96 wrote:dont ever confuse performance with quality construction!think of a firebird-high performance,but certainly NOT high quality!firestone has a history of tire recalls and safety issues as far back as the mid 70s with their "high performance radial 500`s that were OEM on camaro & other performance cars,lets not even talk about the explorer issue or the one after that!
Okay, I understand the reason behind your comments, but I will still difffer inre the Firehawk SZ50EP. I had excellent results with it (having tried many brands in 30 years of driving!) Nothing like personal experience to validate the results, by the way!
Little things like the fact that it would stay in perfect balance after many thousands of miles without problems (demonstrating solid construction), No problems with vibration (pretty much never went out of balance much at all - except when I had a nail through one), excellent adhesion, after 3/4 worn, the same as the day I got it (builds confidence in wet weather driving), etc., etc., etc.
If you are willing to search for some of my earlier posts about how impressive this tire is, you will see how I (and others who have tried it) feel about the SZ50EP! The Tire Rack ratings on many Firestone tires are poor, yes, but the SZ50EP ratings reflect other good user experiences too!
Z
BTW, the "Explorer issue" was clearly shown to be mostly (not all, but mostly) related to people who did not understand that keeping tires inflated to the correct pressure is essential to making sure that tall sidewall tires (on SUV's, in particular) do not flex a lot, and generate too much heat, and may thus fail.