There's a reason no one has done this yet...think about how much of a PITA it will be with TWICE of everything needed for a single turbo install....all the piping, oil lines, wastegates, ugghh, it makes me nervous just thinking about it. If anyone does this successfully it will be more for the "awe" or "gimmick" factor than anything else. It's complicated enough adding and plumbing a t/c system to a previously n/a engine, but 2 turbos would just be a headache IMO. Bottom-line, it's impracticle, unfeasible, and superfluous when people are making 533+ rwhp on a single turbo setup...ElNegro wrote:Has anyone twin turbo'd or have heard about someone twin turbo-ing a KA? Would there be any advantage (throttle response) to run a twin turbo setup? They twin turbo inline six's why not an inline four? I think it would be very interesting project to say the least.
It's a matter of lag between the pulses. Four cylinders into one turbo provides a more stable energy delivery to the turbine. The problem with twins on a four cylinder engine is not only the two exhaust pulses per turbo per two revolutions but the delay in between the pulses during which the turbine will decellerate.andrave wrote:mine are skyline GTR turbos. parallel turbos. I don't see why two exauhst pulses would be unable to spin a small turbo any less than 4 could spin one twice as large...thats deep.
There are plenty of EJ20 bi-turbo engines overseas.madbouncy wrote:Good luck with your setup Andrave, look forward to seeing the dynos of it in action. As for TT setups on 4 cylinders, it's all just how you do it, as long as you pulses are spaced apart equally it should be ok. Also, there's twin turbo kits out there for the WRX that do the same thing about using a turbo for each 2 cylinders. obviously, it's different for a wrx since it's a boxer engine, but if I could find some dynos of the setups, it would show that it works fine.
Didn't have any luck finding the TT kit I saw before. Oh well.
They are the same... European cars typically are called "BiTurbo" (adapted from the Italians and Germans) and the Japanese stuck with "Twin Turbo".captainoftheknights wrote:hi this is my first post here so here goesThere is biturbo and twin turbo
JZA80 Supras are sequential, as are FD3S RX7'scaptainoftheknights wrote:hi this is my first post here so here goesThere is biturbo and twin turbo, now i am not sure which one is which but one is where you just have two turbos in the system like the 300zx supra and the way i want my truck. the turbos dont intereact with eachother there is just more than one. then you have sequential turbos like some porches have then you have one smaller one and one larger one. so you get the quick spool up of the small one and the big power of the large one. this is normaly used to make a car more streeable so tha tyou dont have this huge yank of power when the large turbo spools up.
A twin scroll turbocharger basically has two channels for the exhaust gas to enter. The manifold is designed so that no two sequentially fired cylinders of the engine feed the same scroll. This prevents the pulses from interfering with each other as they pass through the housing.madbouncy wrote:The only thing I meant that was different about the boxer engine was that you'll have an exhaust manifold on each side of the engine, so it almost seems natural to have two turbos on it. One for each bank of cylinders. Where as with our inline 4, you'll have to have the manifolds go different ways so you have the room for two turbos and their piping. It's nothing hard, just have to watch yourself and measure carefully.
Nismo, do you think you could explain what twin scroll turbos are? I searched and all I found was that it has two spots that the exhaust gases enter. It said it did that so the pulses wouldn't hit each other. I thought if you had a good manifold, the pulses would all hit at different times anyways? It seems odd to have a special turbo made rather than a good manifold that would benefit any turbo used with it. Is it only for engines that have multiple cylinders firing at the same time?
He was assuming this because the manifolds could be more easily made shorter due to not having to route the manifold around another in the case of an inline 4 setup.andrave wrote:how would a boxer give you "better temps for better turbo performance" than an inline engine?
Actually, the MK4 Supras used a Sequential Twin Turbo System. the term sequential is misleading to me though. It's more of a 2-stage turbo set-up. One turbo is always ready to boost. As load and RPM increases, a couple of valves open allowing the second turbo to spool, but does so in parallel to the first turbo. Both turbos are the same size. And I am not aware of any porsche or factory turbo car for that matter that uses dual turbos of unequal sizes. It would have to be a staged set-up in order to take advantage of a small turbo's spool as it would just split the airflow at some percentage(which would change based on efficiency, boost and airflow) between the two turbos if they were set-up in parallel. A small turbo run in parallel would likely bring down top-end efficiency as well. Not exactly ideal and not exactly what I would think is part of Porsche's philosophy.captainoftheknights wrote:there are two types of turbo systems with two turbos. there is biturbo and twin turbo, now i am not sure which one is which but one is where you just have two turbos in the system like the 300zx supra and the way i want my truck. the turbos dont intereact with eachother there is just more than one. then you have sequential turbos like some porches have then you have one smaller one and one larger one. so you get the quick spool up of the small one and the big power of the large one. this is normaly used to make a car more streeable so tha tyou dont have this huge yank of power when the large turbo spools up. i havent seen many TTs in 4 bangers but i asume your system is sequential
Did you even read my post? LOL.C-Kwik wrote:Actually, the MK4 Supras used a Sequential Twin Turbo System. the term sequential is misleading to me though. It's more of a 2-stage turbo set-up. One turbo is always ready to boost. As load and RPM increases, a couple of valves open allowing the second turbo to spool, but does so in parallel to the first turbo. Both turbos are the same size. And I am not aware of any porsche or factory turbo car for that matter that uses dual turbos of unequal sizes. It would have to be a staged set-up in order to take advantage of a small turbo's spool as it would just split the airflow at some percentage(which would change based on efficiency, boost and airflow) between the two turbos if they were set-up in parallel. A small turbo run in parallel would likely bring down top-end efficiency as well. Not exactly ideal and not exactly what I would think is part of Porsche's philosophy.