Post by
DjPantsSpecR »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/djpantsspecr-u24575.html
Wed Aug 17, 2005 5:15 pm
ah, see i originally had that, but i havent had that for a few months. I'd also be curious to know how my 240/240 set will do in my automatic.
also i know someone on here said 248/232 to him felt mushy in the lows and 240/232 was nicer for him.
The best i can answer that question for you is:if 248/248 felt better in the top end than 240/248, but the low end felt worse and the midrange was shifted up significantly. Now, on the butt dyno the midrange with 248/232 feels WAY better than 248/248 and the top end feels the same (however the noticeable loss is only between 6500-7000) but just about everyone knows to shift before that.so through reason, which is barely ever right, 248/232 should feel better than 240/248, and to my recolection, it does.
Now if you think for a second why this is true it makes a little more sense, and thats what convinced me to complete this swap. Useing the 248 on the intake side allows for a lot of duration to fill the cylinder. Also the 248 used on the exhaust side allows a lot of time to evacuate exhaust.
Unfortunately typical automotive reason would lead you to believe that bigger numbers make bigger power, thats why fools put 1500cfm carbs on their 350s. All this duration leaves a gang of overlap, which you already knew about, and its only good for producing power up in the high rpms, which i'm sure you already knew.
now, we want to have as much intake as we can handle, but we can decrease overlap with a smaller exhaust cam (by smaller i mean less duration). This decreases overlap and changes when a lot of events happen. Now changing the duration on the exhaust cam seems to do the most work in shifting the powerband.
So in the most long-winded answer ever:speaking completely theoretically, i think 240/248 would not allow as much intake charge as a 248 would, and it still has the "high powerband shifting" 248 exhaust cam.
This thinking is kind of contradictory in that i said earlier changing from 240/248 to 248/248 shifts the power band up a bit higher. i don't believe this to be true, i think the additional intake duration just exploits where the 248 exhaust cam wants to put the power band. There is also the fact that a 248 intake cam rotated four teeth to actually work is off by about three degrees.
I wish i had a more clear, concise answer for ya, but i just cant remember 240/248 as well. i'd also like to just drive home that with 248/248 i always wish i had anoth thousand rpm to really use it because it comes alive so late.