T28.... TD04's are small. If it were a TD05, maybe...XTCshri2222 wrote:MY stock T25 is shot, the seal is leaking like mad.
Looking for a affordable replacement turbo.
Whats oppionion on a TD04H with a T25/T28 flang
or should i stick with the more conventional T28?
Bull$hit... the 2871R is NOT too much for a ca18det. It's all in your wheel/tire/susp setup. There are plenty of s-chassis cars making more power than the 350 that Angel put down...OmarM wrote:the 2871r is a great turbo, but its too much for a ca18det on the street. My buddy has one on his sr20 with cams and rom tune, and he has grippy 225/45/16s in the back and it the car is useless until third gear on the street. Though it does run 11.5s at 117 on ET Streets.
OmarM wrote:the 2871r is a great turbo, but its too much for a ca18det on the street. My buddy has one on his sr20 with cams and rom tune, and he has grippy 225/45/16s in the back and it the car is useless until third gear on the street. Though it does run 11.5s at 117 on ET Streets.
I can get a picture right now...TurboFortysx wrote:The 2871R is perfect for the street. I can get a picture this weekend if you want it.
Umm...there is no "HKS" GT2871Rcapwred wrote:thats not a hks gt2871r
You show me one dynosheet of a GT2871R making 377whp on a stock block s13 redtop sr20det with just cams 264degrees, gt2871r with .64 exhaust housing, not the big one, and a rom tune, no greddy intake manifold either. You show me, I have searched, oh yeah and boost at about 18 pounds i believe. RS-Enthalpy Scott is amazed it makes that kind of power with no greddy intake manifold or big exhaust housing.c-rad wrote:
Bull$hit... the 2871R is NOT too much for a ca18det. It's all in your wheel/tire/susp setup. There are plenty of s-chassis cars making more power than the 350 that Angel put down...
Settle down tiger... I never said more with THAT turbo. I just said more than him HP wise.OmarM wrote:You show me one dynosheet of a GT2871R making 377whp on a stock block s13 redtop sr20det with just cams 264degrees, gt2871r with .64 exhaust housing, not the big one, and a rom tune, no greddy intake manifold either. You show me, I have searched, oh yeah and boost at about 18 pounds i believe. RS-Enthalpy Scott is amazed it makes that kind of power with no greddy intake manifold or big exhaust housing.
thats what i was saying.i know theres no hks one.c-rad wrote:
Umm...there is no "HKS" GT2871R
Granted I'm only running a 205/50/16 right now, but I can't run more than about 10psi, or first gear just lights up the tires. I have EVERY intention of running Apex's AVC-R Boost Controller. It's stupid expensive, but I LOVE the gear based boost control. I will have to modify my CA transmission to get it to work like I want, but I really feel it's a great controller and with a high HP car, is the best way to get an easily controllable car.tyrannix wrote:maybe your friend should get a multi-stage boost controller? (if im understanding and he just spins his wheels until third?) or did you mean he gets no power until third?
I heard the AVC-R has a lot of trouble with quick spooling/low boost. My friend had it on his Eclipse running a 16G and never got it work right. Although my friend with a 50-trim on his SR loved it. The only one that I have personally used that seems to work good is the Profec B (old one, not spec II) or the new Type S. It's a dual stage and you can get the remote to make it easier to switch between the two.float_6969 wrote:Granted I'm only running a 205/50/16 right now, but I can't run more than about 10psi, or first gear just lights up the tires. I have EVERY intention of running Apex's AVC-R Boost Controller. It's stupid expensive, but I LOVE the gear based boost control. I will have to modify my CA transmission to get it to work like I want, but I really feel it's a great controller and with a high HP car, is the best way to get an easily controllable car.