Post by
Eswift »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/eswift-u367.html
Fri Jan 31, 2003 5:24 am
give us some specs on the 240 track and wheelbase, and maybe we can either clear up or defend this myth.
i have a feeling that this myth might jsut come from the ease of differential interchangeability between the two cars.
the fact that there is no space between the j30 firewall and front suspension shows that no car based on the same chassis was designed for a manual transmission. 300zx suspension parts are similar, and you can tell they are nissan through and through, but geometry, scale, and placement is completely different. i assume the same will be true with the 240.
the fact that the j30 also accomodated the nissan V8 engine is a strong argument for little similarity in the designs.
and just stretched? i would guess the j30 is a bit wider as well.
or, you could just go to nissan's chassis code designation for the J30:Y32. doesnt sound like it would be very similar to the s13.
it could be that the frame rails look similar, although stretched. for nissan, the closer cars are to each other, even without direct part interchangebility, the cheaper it is to design. although full interchangeability would dessimate manufacturing costs, dont you think the cars would get a little boring?
I also think that if the designs were that similar, super hicas would have been available at least at some point on the 240.