did you really just say that about the CA in the CA forum?yeahpancake wrote:can't say im the biggest fan of the ca, but it'll do till i can drop an sr in
i love bandwagonsks13 wrote:
did you really just say that about the CA in the CA forum?
drop your SR in already maaan, its like, the oonly way to be.
you by chance no anything about that disassembled CA being sold on florida drift? I was debating picking it up.....Jintei wrote:Nice car man! You don't live that far from me, either..
Are you with the HK crew by any chance? And what is on the dash!? And lmk if you decide to sell the CA
-Michael
just a question, but why would i spend 3k on an sr? with an $1800 sr, fmic, boost controller, and rom tune i can push 260-280hp and 290-300tq.ca18detgabby wrote:
you by chance no anything about that disassembled CA being sold on florida drift? I was debating picking it up.....
PS I dont understand the swapping form a CA to an SR, but w/e floats your boat I suppose. 3k spend on the SR can go a hell of a long way in the CA.... even 1.5k if you pick up one off a local forum goes along way.
thanks man. i actually live in new tampa now, but i go out to cocoa every now and then for the beach. ill let you know when i eventually get rid of the beast motorJintei wrote:Nice car man! You don't live that far from me, either..
Are you with the HK crew by any chance? And what is on the dash!? And lmk if you decide to sell the CA
-Michael
i'll enjoy them, thanks. they make easy cheap power because parts are cheaper for sr20's. i mean, show me a ca18det with a t25g and fmic that is making 280hp/300tq to the wheels and ill retract my statements.yourmomsrps13 wrote:If /when you swap to SR enjoy the rocker arm problems if you go into high horse power range. what makes a SR make HP easier then a CA. i know CAs rev better though.
PS who from DA gave the S14 the wreath?
I was talking the initial cost of the the SR(2.5-3k ish for a decent motor and trans)....... motor set costs alone vs the same invested in the already running CA seems odd to me for an aluminum bottom end and .2Ls..... specially when you could bore out the CA and run a good set of pistons to achive the the same amount.yeahpancake wrote:
just a question, but why would i spend 3k on an sr? with an $1800 sr, fmic, boost controller, and rom tune i can push 260-280hp and 290-300tq.
i mean, the ca is pretty beast at .8 bar. i just like sr's because they make easy power for cheap. to each his/her own.
oh and the dash is covered by brown bear shag. i thought it was pretty classy
yeah that piner guy said he had a parts motor laying around too...... I was going to buy his a while back, just never got around to doing it.Jintei wrote:Gabby, you mean "exitsine" right?
I know he's had that motor for a while. I was actually thinking of going to take a look at it. It never hurts to have a backup motor!
you'll enjoy the problems??? ha ok anyways I had to break into tony's house once but only because he asked me to. The cars pictured are decent. i think your really just getting bashed because you tittled a post based off a cheesy MTV show, but hey what did you expect.yeahpancake wrote:
i'll enjoy them, thanks. they make easy cheap power because parts are cheaper for sr20's. i mean, show me a ca18det with a t25g and fmic that is making 280hp/300tq to the wheels and ill retract my statements.
im not putting down the ca in any way. i would rather have an sr with a cheap and reliable 280hp. some people like drag racing, some people like drifting. some people like ca's, some people like sr's. why not just leave it at that instead of telling me how dissapointed i will be once i drop an sr20 in my engine bay?
wreath was put on the car when amir had it by tony angelo
2 friends I know get only with their SR setup with a t28 from a s15 in the 26x rwhp range on the dyno. In no way you gonna get to 280hp with the oem t25g turbo.progman wrote:I want to see an SR make 280 horse power with a t25g.
it was sarcasm because ive owned 3 sr's and ive never had a problem with any single one of them. one had 230, the next had 250, and the last one had 280. i dont need more power than that.yourmomsrps13 wrote:you'll enjoy the problems??? ha ok anyways I had to break into tony's house once but only because he asked me to. The cars pictured are decent. i think your really just getting bashed because you tittled a post based off a cheesy MTV show, but hey what did you expect.
exactly my point. i would rather spend the time that you guys spend on boring out your ca's and everything on seat time instead...because seat time is more fun than trying to squeeze more power out of a CA.meminto wrote:The boring out a CA to a very close displacement of an SR (1998cc) will need 160 though oversize pistons (or 4.0mm) this will give you 1987cc. Tomei used to have a stroker kit to combat this issue, which the crank was based on the CA20 crank, unfortunately I think this is now a discontinued item.
AFAIK, you can only buy off the shelf 40 thou (1mm) oversize pistons which will take the displacement to 1853cc. You can always have custom pistons made up, however the issue is you will risk cracking the cylinder walls boring out this far (you can get away with thinner walls if you grout fill the water jackets around each 1/2 way)
I have toyed with the idea of using RB26 pistons (87mm bore) in a CA build, I even went as far as measuring it all up, but I was forced into another rebuild (original engineer did not finish bores correctly) and had to use the block from my experimental motor.
thanks dudenvrplzd240 wrote:Sr, ca, meh whatever. Do what makes you happy man.
Coupe looks clean, and that fc was real sexy.
there's something that everyone in this thread besides a select few people just dont understand.ca18detgabby wrote:
I was talking the initial cost of the the SR(2.5-3k ish for a decent motor and trans)....... motor set costs alone vs the same invested in the already running CA seems odd to me for an aluminum bottom end and .2Ls..... specially when you could bore out the CA and run a good set of pistons to achive the the same amount.
I agree with you that extracting power from an sr is a little easier than a CA, but the conversion alone will be around the same amount of "seat" time as freshening up your CA... especially if you plan to open up the SR prior to conversion.yeahpancake wrote:
exactly my point. i would rather spend the time that you guys spend on boring out your ca's and everything on seat time instead...because seat time is more fun than trying to squeeze more power out of a CA.
i actually traded my rx7 with a blown motor for my CA coupe.meminto wrote:
I agree with you that extracting power from an sr is a little easier than a CA, but the conversion alone will be around the same amount of "seat" time as freshening up your CA... especially if you plan to open up the SR prior to conversion.
Personally I wouldn't trust a secondhand motor, too much risk for me... Out of curiosity, was there a reason to purchase it with the CA rather than the SR?
Not having a dig, just confused by the logic...
ks13 wrote:post a graph showing 280whp 290 ft/lbs of tq from an sr20det with a t25g, and I still wont believe that it made that power.
dont get to flustered man, you dogged on our god of a motor.....and CA owners tend to get attatched perhaps.
I know that Aceinhole on FA and Zilvia put down 300 hp on his KA-T a few years ago with an SRT25g.....so 300 is possible on that turbo...but.....not on an SR unless its stroked or something.ks13 wrote:post a graph showing 280whp 290 ft/lbs of tq from an sr20det with a t25g, and I still wont believe that it made that power.
dont get to flustered man, you dogged on our god of a motor.....and CA owners tend to get attatched perhaps.
yes, it is possible. please call xat racing up and ask about aussie steve's s13. ignorance is bliss.mbmbmb23 wrote:
I know that Aceinhole on FA and Zilvia put down 300 hp on his KA-T a few years ago with an SRT25g.....so 300 is possible on that turbo...but.....not on an SR unless its stroked or something.
-m