I have never seen a Navara, or Patrol (Ute versions included) with a stock SR20DE engine in them.WeldingHank wrote:what others don't know is, that the SR20 was the engine of choice for the nissan trucks of japan. so pot, call the kettle black.
V6 Mustangs were not even close to the same market as the 240SX.ILikeMy240sx wrote:maybe Nissan knew that they would put it in a truck or maybe they didn;t but we will never know...
I think the major reason why they decided to make it perform like a "truck" engine is because they wanted to compete with v6 mustangs... making 4 cylinders torquier than other import 4 cylinders.
I think in doing so Nissan just decided to put that motor in a truck later on to save R&D cost... but who knows
Thats because they rev to 7200 - 7600 in stock trim, and they also rev alot quicker than the KA counterpart. The two engines drive alot differently.justmerging wrote:I did not know that. hmmmmm. But you don't ever hear the SR being refferred to as a truck motor.
Yeah, honestly there is nothing wrong with the KA. It just isn't blessed with alot of power immediately at the factory. So alot of people give it crap for obvious reasoning.one80sxy wrote:I just think it's funny that people say "truck motor" like it's a bad thing...the Viper's engine is also in a truck, but does anyone bash that? No. I mean, personally, I'd rather have a "truck motor" than, I don't know, a 1.6L 4cyl Honda fart...and cams will solve the lacking of top-end problem.
No but revving high is always an advantage. The higher the engine revs the more power it has the potential to make, and the faster the gear ratios can be.98s14inaz wrote:You don't need to rev high when you make your power down low and have displacement.