transmission Swap

A home for 1983–1989 300ZX owners!
jtiet87
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:30 pm
Car: 1976 280z

Post

I have a 1976 280z with a 4speed transmission. I'm wondering if I could swap it with a 5speed transmission?


User avatar
TurboKen
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2007 3:58 pm

Post

You can do a direct swap with other 5 speed from 280Z-280ZX with no problem.

If your want to get a different gearing and more modern transmission. YOu can use your original bellhousing of your transmission and bolt in a 5-6 speed transmission from a 240SX. YOur bellhousing will require some modification but it can be done also the driveshaft will need to be shortened 2 inched since the 240Sx is a little longer.

Here is my Original posting in Zcar. http://www.zcar.com/forums/read/1/488434

You can also get more info from Blue's website: http://atlanticz.ca/zclub/tech....html

User avatar
evildky
Posts: 14225
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 9:23 pm
Car: 71 Datsun 240ZT
87 Nissan 300ZX N/A-T
06 Nissan 350Z GT
Toyota Tundra TRD RW
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Post

the ka swap is fine if thats all you can locate, it's nto the strongest or easiest to swap, here si a writeup I did when I swapped it a few years agohttp://forums.hybridz.org/showthread.php?t=96569

here is another thread from this very section very recentlyhttp://forums.nicoclub.com/zerothread/293033

the quickest cheapest easiest swap is the 79-73 280ZX n/a trans, it's a bolt in, if you want to put some serious power down the 82-83 280ZX Turbo T-5 is the only choice, the 240sx trans is stronger than the n/a but not as strong as the T5 (the Z31 guys are wrong!) and it's also more work to swap in

jtiet87
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:30 pm
Car: 1976 280z

Post

thank you =D i finally made enough money now its time to start on the engine and transmission thanks A LOT

rwaelde
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:39 am

Post

I have installed a 5spd out of a 280zx(n/a) into my 260, but the shifter isn't lined up with the hole in the floor any more. it appears to be about an inch or 2 forward of where it used to be. Is there a remedy for this, or should I just put a crook in it so it pops out at the OG spot. It makes a hell of a stink without the rubber boot on.

Thanks, first post.

jtiet87
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:30 pm
Car: 1976 280z

Post

I also have a 280zx transmission N/A (83), i'm wondering do I need a new U JOINT? drive shaft or whatever? or can/will the transmission still fit in my car no problem? I have a 1976 280z.

User avatar
DemonZ
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:28 pm
Car: 1972 240Z

Post

rwaelde wrote:I have installed a 5spd out of a 280zx(n/a) into my 260, but the shifter isn't lined up with the hole in the floor any more. it appears to be about an inch or 2 forward of where it used to be. Is there a remedy for this, or should I just put a crook in it so it pops out at the OG spot. It makes a hell of a stink without the rubber boot on.

Thanks, first post.
I put a 5speed in my 240 out of an 82zx 2+2, the shift arm is different, but i took it out and replaced it with my original 240's 4speed trans shift arm and it fit fine.

User avatar
evildky
Posts: 14225
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 9:23 pm
Car: 71 Datsun 240ZT
87 Nissan 300ZX N/A-T
06 Nissan 350Z GT
Toyota Tundra TRD RW
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Post

jtiet87 wrote:I also have a 280zx transmission N/A (83), i'm wondering do I need a new U JOINT? drive shaft or whatever? or can/will the transmission still fit in my car no problem? I have a 1976 280z.
I believe that will be a straight swap

User avatar
DemonZ
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:28 pm
Car: 1972 240Z

Post

jtiet87 wrote:I also have a 280zx transmission N/A (83), i'm wondering do I need a new U JOINT? drive shaft or whatever? or can/will the transmission still fit in my car no problem? I have a 1976 280z.
It's a straight swap, the only thing you may need to do is re use your old transmission mount

jtiet87
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:30 pm
Car: 1976 280z

Post

thanks evil and demon what would i do without yah

jtiet87
Posts: 82
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:30 pm
Car: 1976 280z

Post

how much power will the 79-83 (n/a) transmission hold up to? lets say as a daily driver without any abusive driving?

User avatar
evildky
Posts: 14225
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 9:23 pm
Car: 71 Datsun 240ZT
87 Nissan 300ZX N/A-T
06 Nissan 350Z GT
Toyota Tundra TRD RW
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Post

if you're not racing it or doing hard launches it'll be fine, I'd say 300 hp is about all it would take to trash one but even then it's the launches that get you, you can out out 1000 hp as long as there si no shock load

User avatar
sharjt
Posts: 159
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:11 am
Car: '06 G35 Sedan 6MT
'83 Datsun 280zx turbo - RIP
Location: Huntsvegas, AL

Post

also the 83 had a Borg Warner T5. This is the Same transmission they put in the 80s model Mustangs and cameros. It's a lot stronger than the 79 - 82. I believe it should be good for up to 500 with a good clutch (Maybe).

User avatar
DemonZ
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:28 pm
Car: 1972 240Z

Post

jtiet87 wrote:how much power will the 79-83 (n/a) transmission hold up to? lets say as a daily driver without any abusive driving?
The 79-83 transmission is the stronger of the 2 NA Z 5 speed transmissions. The BorgWarner T5 is stronger, but depending on the condition of the internals, so long as it hasnt been abused you should be good till around 400 or so HP.The pre 79 5 speeds have a really weak 5th gear and i would not suggest using that for any turbo Z.
evildky wrote:if you're not racing it or doing hard launches it'll be fine, I'd say 300 hp is about all it would take to trash one but even then it's the launches that get you, you can out out 1000 hp as long as there si no shock load
Z Rob Go here in Austin has a 77 Turbo Z with a little around 350HP and is using the 79-83 NA 5Speed. I have an NA 5speed from an 82 2+2 that I will be using on my car.The only problems Z Rob has is that he eats the Clutch and pressure plate(which we are replacing tonight). He just trashed a competition clutch a few weeks ago, and it also eats tail shaft seals from time to time.

The transmission itself is still in good shape.

User avatar
DemonZ
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:28 pm
Car: 1972 240Z

Post

A lot of people under estimate some of the Z parts... Yes it is true that there are some weak links on the Z, but there are parts you can replace them with that are much stronger.

Btw, I love this pic:


User avatar
evildky
Posts: 14225
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 9:23 pm
Car: 71 Datsun 240ZT
87 Nissan 300ZX N/A-T
06 Nissan 350Z GT
Toyota Tundra TRD RW
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Post

do you're eating clutches by riding the clutch to save the transmission or you just have mroe power than the cluthc can hold? are you useing the amsll or large clutch? I had destroyed a CF and a NISMO clutch of the smaller size before upgrading to the turbo flywheel, and I run a CC stage 4, it's held flawlessly, my car syno'd 299hp, it'll be closer to 4 if wiesco ever gets my pistons done

User avatar
DemonZ
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:28 pm
Car: 1972 240Z

Post

Not my car, and the clutch he destroyed w
evildky wrote:do you're eating clutches by riding the clutch to save the transmission or you just have mroe power than the cluthc can hold? are you useing the amsll or large clutch? I had destroyed a CF and a NISMO clutch of the smaller size before upgrading to the turbo flywheel, and I run a CC stage 4, it's held flawlessly, my car syno'd 299hp, it'll be closer to 4 if wiesco ever gets my pistons done
Not my car, and the clutch he destroyed was a Clutch Masters Comp clutch rated at 400HP. The clutch disk was shredded and the pressure plate was also damaged. Based on the damage to the pressure plate, it appears that it was the reason the clutch disk shredded. The transmission itself has had no problem. The gear oil is a few years old and still looks brand new, no metal what so ever.

He did however destroy the 76 5 Speed he had on the car 3 years ago, but that was a long time ago.

User avatar
evildky
Posts: 14225
Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2004 9:23 pm
Car: 71 Datsun 240ZT
87 Nissan 300ZX N/A-T
06 Nissan 350Z GT
Toyota Tundra TRD RW
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Post

so it was the small one? the larger turbo plate has like 30% more clamping force to start with, it's a must for any modified datsun

User avatar
DemonZ
Posts: 122
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 1:28 pm
Car: 1972 240Z

Post

evildky wrote:so it was the small one? the larger turbo plate has like 30% more clamping force to start with, it's a must for any modified datsun
Like I said, not my car, so I'm not sure which one he was using, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was the smaller NA clutch.

I definitely agree that the Turbo clutch is a worthwhile investment. Considering that the NA clutch is 8 3/4 inch diameter and the Turbo and 2+2 clutch are both using a 9 1/2 inch disk, I would definitely go with the Turbo or 2+2 clutch for anything over 250hp.

We stuck a new stock NA clutch disk and a slightly used stock NA pressure plate back in until he gets his new comp clutch in a few weeks. The NA clutch is working fine, but I did warn him not to rev her up too high because the clutch most likely wont last if he really starts putting all the engines power through it.

I also recommend brake ugrades for any modified datsun as well. The first modification I made was to thebrakes. I did the rear disk conversion, used drilled and slotted disks, ceramic pads, proportioning valve, the toyota 4 piston caliper upgrade(also with ceramic pads, Stainless brake lines, and the 15/16ths master cylinder from the S130's. If I could find the larger brake booster from the 2+2's I'd be using that too.

I love the Z's because there are so many modifications you can make by swapping parts around from other Nissans and wind up with a really wicked setup.


Return to “300ZX (Z31) Forum”