Sissy traitor!Clyons0203 wrote:Yeah I hate to see her go, but the G35 was too nice to pass up. G35 had premium B package and sports package.
Dealer gave me $1500 for a 94 Q with 152k, slight bumper damange and a torn driver's seat.
Anyway, I have a few parts forsale left from the Q.
1- Body control module for a 94 Q1- NICO ECU stage 2 (jdm smog, 7200rev limit, 91 octane, non TCS, non Active)1-key fob remote
The key fob remote is broken at the bottom where it attaches to a key ring. I have the plastic piece that broke off, super glue can probably fix it. The buttons are faded some.
Make some offers with shipping (my zip is 27407). I have paypal! No low ballers.
It is, but even with the 6MT, couldn't get me out of my Q45, nor could the Y34.96Qowner wrote:The G35 is a nice car. Congratulations, Clyons.
So how much for the NICO ECU?Clyons0203 wrote:1- NICO ECU stage 2 (jdm smog, 7200rev limit, 91 octane, non TCS, non Active)Make some offers with shipping (my zip is 27407). I have paypal! No low ballers.
To each their own ... a 2003 M45 (Y34) got me out of my 1995 Q45! Reminded me of the performance of my 1991 Q45!maxnix wrote:It is, but even with the 6MT, couldn't get me out of my Q45, nor could the Y34.
Enjoy.
No Infiniti or Nissan has ever been built with the attention to detail the orginal Q45 had. Nissan wont build them like that no more because building them like that got them no where. It didnt make sense to offer such advanced features, REAL leather on the doors, world class V8...... then use plastic as chain guides, injectors that foul if you look at them wrong, and no transmission cooler.Q45tech wrote:If a 95Q used materials and construction techinques that retailed for $50k twelve years ago, corrected for inflation that $75,000 today.
A $35,000 G35 in todays dollars even with a 5AT has to be built to a lower standard.
Now volume of production can only go so far.
If you place the two side by side and strip off each component you will see the structural and strength diffferences.
Obviously 600 pounds differences in weight allow certain THINNING of components.
I completely agree. That was part of my earlier question - what is the most G50-like replacement for someone who isn't willing or able to restore a 15+ year old car?Q45tech wrote:Actually very few cars from any company under $80,000 are built as well as as they did prior to 1996.....................even Mercedes has cheapened up....
Technicans have a different view of cars that is difficult for owners to understand blinded as they are by the cars bling.
Just wait until these G pass the 7-8 year mark and tell me again how much better they are than an old heavy 90-96Q. See you in 2010.
Jesda is right. Nissan can't afford to build a car like the G50 any more. It waqs a once in a lifetime endeavor, never to be repeated.G35 is a nice little car, I like 'em, but they're not Q45s by any means.Great car for the wife.Nearest thing to a G50 today in the Infiniti/Nissan lineup is the latest version of the M45. It's actually a very nice car, still not a G50, but as good or better than many of it's competitors. It got rave reviews from car mags, even Consumers's Reports, of all mags. Maybe a little faster then my '05 Q45, and more direct steering, but not quite as luxurious. If you want more handling/performance, get a new or very recent ('05 or '06)M45. If you want luxury, and still FAST, find a GOOD low mileage '05 or '06 Q45 (06's are hard to find; they didn't import many).Jesda wrote:The G35 is a cheaply made little car thats actually a good bit of fun to drive.
The Q45... that level of quality will never be seen again. Nissan is now the GM of Japanafrance. Oh well.
Congrats on the new ride!
Dentists, suburban trophy wives, and old folks all have plenty of money and bland tastes. I bought my LS simply because it was reliable, allowing me to spend extra cash on less dependable but far more interesting cars. Its the most boring car I've ever owned, but its nice. I wouldn't mind a Lincoln Mark VIII to complement the Caddy Seville. Maybe a Miata... or a C4 Corvette with an LT1.
It might! Tommy (tech at T3 Decatur) says the G35s are bulletproof except for the brakes, but using I35 pads instead of G35 pads greatly extends the brake life (G35 pads eat up the rotors). G35 engine is more or less the same as I35/Maxima (which has proven reliability) and the transmission is same as Q45 (with smaller engine). Sure the small components may wear faster, the exhaust may rust out in some states, and the paint may fade if not taken care of (happens to Qs too).... but it's minimally smaller than a Q45 (same wheelbase) and a lot more bang for the buck.elwesso wrote:Will your G35 still look good with original paint? Will you have 150k on the original motor and beat the tar out of it every day?
Classic nostalgia by soemone who's got "experience." Human beings as they age wish for previous times because it makes life simpler, more understandable. "In my day......"Q45tech wrote:Actually very few cars from any company under $80,000 are built as well as as they did prior to 1996.....................even Mercedes has cheapened up.
Computer advances have allowed the vehicle to be 100% simulated to reduce the EXTRA levels of strength added by just to be extra safe engineers.Cost of a mild rear end bump on a G35 has balloned, something that will cost $500 [paint] on an old Q will cost $2700 on a G ............now granted insurance usually pays these cost buthe G will never again be the same.
Technicans have a different view of cars that is difficult for owners to understand blinded as they are by the cars bling.
Just wait until these G pass the 7-8 year mark and tell me again how much better they are than an old heavy 90-96Q. See you in 2010.
I may get rid of my '92 Q in a year or two if the $$$ is right. Very good shape other than broken A/C (better as weekend car than daily driver).bullittandy wrote:However, if anything happens to my 97 I'm going to putting out offers on this board to buy a 90-93 just so I can experience the fuss.
True, but for an everyday commuter the latter two can do quite well.StarPD wrote:The G35 is not a Q45, nor is it its equal. But then, what car really is the equal of the G50. Not even the FY33 or F50 really is.