Track time from last night

Information on the naturally-aspirated KA24E and KA24DE engines.
240ondrugs
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 2:09 pm
Car: my car and my family.

Post

Last night I went to test and tune night at morosso motorsports park. Mybest time was 15.566 @96.76 mph. My r/t was 1.716 and 60 ft time was 2.612. This was on street tires and letting the automatic transmission shift itself. I think it sucks, what do you guys think?:help


S13Ka24e
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2002 11:26 am
Car: Tunning, reading, learning

Post

With or without nitrous? Did you hold down the brake and rev the engine to 1700-1800 rpm? The auto 240sx's have a 1800 rpm stall speed so you can rev to that mark without damage.

240ondrugs
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 2:09 pm
Car: my car and my family.

Post

that was with the nitrious! launched car at 2000 rpm (held gas and break) squeezed nitrious at 3000 rpm. the 1st time I squeezed off the line and couldn't get tracktion to save my life.

91nis240
Posts: 334
Joined: Wed Oct 02, 2002 2:11 pm

Post

wow if i was running a 75 shot id be running a 14.0 flat very easily, sorry lol. but yeh that is odd to be running that time even in an automatic. I dunno man.

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

thats is kinda slow. my auto 95 with cold air, headers and exhaust was hittin 15.6-15.7. are you sure the nitrous is goin through? wait the venom 400 might be *****in up the timing alot with the nitrous shootin.

User avatar
XCrunner19420
Posts: 242
Joined: Thu Nov 28, 2002 4:06 pm

Post

Just look at the r/t, 1.716!?!?, did you fall asleep or something? you can drop a second off that and be in the 14's I believe

Aries
Posts: 2404
Joined: Tue Aug 27, 2002 6:23 am
Car: LT1 240SS
Contact:

Post

R/T has no effect on your times.the timer does not start until after you react (wheels must un-light the first of the stage bulbs).

I would go through and check the timingm, the O2 sensor output signal voltage, and probably rethink the nitrous nozle placement.

To atomize correctly you want the nozle as far away from the throttle body as possible on a dry kit. On the wet you want it 6 to 8 inches away.

What ti sounds like to me is that your O2 sensors are keeping your injectors open to 100% all of the time, and the venom module is trying to advance timing on top of that. I would switch the venom module of, and try again after checking everything.

ralphyboy
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2003 11:04 am
Location: Sarasota FL

Post

nobody seems to notice the nearly 97 mph speed. looks to me like there is a severe traction prob, at this point I would concentrate on my driving with those r/ts and the time vs the mph that you had. Traditionally 98,99 mph is high 13s

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

hatinfwds wrote:nobody seems to notice the nearly 97 mph speed. looks to me like there is a severe traction prob, at this point I would concentrate on my driving with those r/ts and the time vs the mph that you had. Traditionally 98,99 mph is high 13s


good point. with ur list of mods i definitly think you should be in at least low 14's

still think u should turn off the venom

nlzmo400r
Posts: 4904
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 12:23 pm
Car: '02 Nissan Altima QR25DE
'93 Nissan 240SX hatch KA24DE

Post

yea a problem is obvious, pinpoint it, fix it, and get ATLEAST low 14s, nice set up u have going, cool

240ondrugs
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 2:09 pm
Car: my car and my family.

Post

thanks for all the input im going to go to the track again and try some of your suggestions. on the street i feel so much faster than my times, but i know the track is diffrent.:confused:

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

it was already said that reaction time has nothin to do with 1/4mi time. the clock doesnt start until u leave the line.

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

its the bomex eye mask for the 95-96 240's. bomexusa.com look up s14

Erik
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 10:23 pm
Car: RWD imports!
Contact:

Post

Quote »thats is kinda slow. my auto 95 with cold air, headers and exhaust was hittin 15.6-15.7.[/quote]

Yeah RIGHT,

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

i have the timeslips from intake and exhuast which was 16.055. after i put on the header i beat every brand new stock V6 Camaro and Firebird i raced. They run 15.7's

Erik
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 10:23 pm
Car: RWD imports!
Contact:

Post

Structure240sx wrote:i have the timeslips from intake and exhuast which was 16.055. after i put on the header i beat every brand new stock V6 Camaro and Firebird i raced. They run 15.7's


so Automatic S14's are just as fast as 5spd S14's...

what where your 60ft times and 1/8th, trapspeed?

so your judging your 1/4 mi times but what you've read V6 camaro's and firebirds run?

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

ok heres how everything was. i think i had about 116,000mi on the car at the time. injen cold air intake and custom 2 1/4" exhuast. i ran it twice at the track. it closed before i put my header on and opened after i started pulling it apart.1st run everr/t 1.28060' 2.472330 6.8921/8 10.490mph 67.42990 13.5471/4 16.295mph 82.76

2nd run that same nightr/t .83760' 2.405330 6.7631/8 10.323mph 66.66990 13.3451/4 16.055mph 83.91

and yea i've read that stock v6 camaros the ones with the 3.8 run 15.7's. i have two freinds both with 97's that i've beat and a brand new camaro on the street. i just barely beat them but i still did.

User avatar
Sygerwulf
Posts: 663
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 10:20 am
Car: 91 240SX SE
Contact:

Post

hmmm, maybe they just couldn't drive the camero's correctly? I've said it before, and I'll say it again. It's professional drivers that lay down the factory specs, not everyday people.

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

good point. but these were auto camaros all you pretty much have to do is floor it. now someone will prob say that they will be slower than 15.7 so i'm an ******* again. but taking .3 sec off my 1/4mi time with the header is beilveable. it makes more power than any other bolt-on. look at technoman he has intake, header, exhuast, 5spd, maybe a pulley, iginition wires hes broken into the 14's. but no more aruguing about this its gettin too serious to me

Erik
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 10:23 pm
Car: RWD imports!
Contact:

Post

I wasn't trying to argue about it, i was just curious, because,

i've never seen a automatic 240 mod for mod keep up with a 5spd, so either you have one exceptional automatic transmission, or those times are bogus..

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

ill email u a pic of the timeslip if you want. i was tryin to attach it but im having a hard time resizing it.

Erik
Posts: 15
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 10:23 pm
Car: RWD imports!
Contact:

Post

it's all good man, i mean doesn't really matter what i think or say.....

every stock auto 240 i've seen has ran high 16s to mid 17's

Structure240sx
Posts: 5615
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2002 5:04 pm

Post

the guy i bought it from siad he took it to the track once and got a 16.5. i think he couldhave done better. i dont see how intake and exhuast could take off .5 sec but it was about 35 degrees out when i ran.

Nismo_Freak
Posts: 10314
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 10:42 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX

Post

With a low trap speed of 83 mph I dont think you will run 15.7s with a header. I gained 2 mph with a header and some shift point changes.

96_S14_SE
Posts: 973
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2002 11:10 am
Car: 96 S14 SE - 05 VW GTI 1.8t - 89 S13 coupe "gold on brown"

Post

^^^ He wont... I have an s14 auto and have a decent amount of mods more then you. I have never gotten a 15.699 and a best of 15.70x at 65f. I mustered a 15.702 a half-year prior with about the same mods as I have currently (few mods where modded as well as some other things) but it was 45f out... Also I swapped from 205' to 225' rubber so I had to have gotten faster as my times dipped after that, plus Im pulling the 15.7 at 20f warmer... I also run about 87 - 90 mph traps...

Headders wont shave .3 Im sorry to say, especially in an auto. I didnt and I would have to say that with an auto, I gained very little from stock mani, precat, test pipe (had 2 cats) N1, to stock mani gutted pre and test pipe, to HS header secondary cat and N1... I noticed no speed increase with a test pipe and headder so I left it off, and run the single cat to save my ears.. With a manual I might have gotten more / something, but if I gained .05 seconds with it on I saw it as none for the god awfull honda sound it emited...

I dont mean to sound rude but its just not there. You also have to think about the transmission as it ages becomes even less efficient. Its like adding parts makes up for the loss of efficiency at times. Or the more power you put down on an aging transmission the more it slips, and the more you loose. I meticulously change the fluid with mobil1 synth atf as well... With a fresh transmission im sure I could be a bit faster, much in a the way a fresh clutch vs an aging one will. I have 111k on mine and have owned maintained it with mobil1 since 28k in 99'.

I may run again soon, but I lost my taste for the strip the second I punted a cone at the auto-x... That was back in sept... Ive remodded some things like the ram air (much better flow but its all internal smoothing :) ), and soon to be cams again so I may go back wed or so...

My mods:EI ram-air intake coupled with a jwt popcharger (see cold air post)Thermally wrapped HS 3" intake tube91' or 240-248 (soon to be 248-232 friday) cams.Dual Altima electric fans (one of my fav auto mods as it gave me .1-.2 and +2-3mpG avg)Accel wires (cheaper then oem as I needed new ones and less resistance)HS headderSingle turtle (cat, 2.5" TP netted nothing in current state)Apexi N1base timing of 22 - 24 depending on conditionsTB coolant lines removedEGR disconnectedupgraded grounds (if you call that a mod)

Then there is the suspension which doesnt really help but still:Koni yellows / progress 1.5" springsES poly LCA / Tension rod bushingswhiteline 29mm / 22mm swaysTanabe / Cusco, F / R STBEI tension rod bracket brace (replicated nismo power brace)EI subframe spacers

EI - Enigmatic Industries, or custom / rigged :)Probably something else but oh well..

I30tMikeD
Posts: 73
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2003 6:22 am

Post

Uh....sorry to butt in here but look at that 60' time. 2.6!!! that is what is making you slow. You can pull close to a second faster if you lower than to a 2.2-2.3. 96mph traps indicate a mid 14sec car.


Return to “KA24E / KA24DE Forum”