AZhitman wrote:Uninspiring indeed.
However, look at the LS400 - Even more boring than the Cressida, and it sold like hotcakes...
Boring but less ugly, and more comfortable/powerful. I mostly agree with you, but I believe Toyota's timing and marketing was so much smarter with the LS400 than the Cressida. The Cressida was indeed a well made thoughtfully designed car I think Toyota made a huge mistake by styling and marketing it toward an older generation that was not enthralled with Japanese products. There are a ton of people in that demographic that lived thru WW2 and did not care for the Japanese. My father was one of them.
Toyota introduced Lexus at a perfect time, when the Baby Boomers, that did not grow up during WW2, who drove well made small japanese cars (Corolla's/Celicas, etc) in their youth and liked them. Started making significantly more money and began wanting bigger fancier cars. At the same time the European makes were jacking up their prices, and Furd/GM were producing cars that were essentially unchanged from the 70's and were still built like crap. Enter Lexus and Infiniti who offered fresh, well designed, well made, reliable, luxurious cars (as nice as the Europeans) and sold them for not much more than the US products. Pretty dang brilliant if you ask me.
There are a lot of great cars that didn't sell well because of poor marketing. The Cressida was one example, the 240sx was another.
And the Avalon is not a descendant of the Cressida. The Avalon was a stretched FWD Camry.