I can deal with low wear and annual replacement if I have to. I'm simply trying to find the best blend of dry traction, wet traction, and longevity possible. Dry traction is the ultimate concern, but the other two are still decision-makers.
I'm actually only planning to replace 2 tires now as I still have two good tires. I'll probably wait a few months to replace the other two. Just seems like a waste to pay for 4 tires when I don't need 4. Especially when I just spent $400 on snow tires in October. I just don't have that much money to dump into tires.I NEED two tires, though, and I'm not going to throw my cash away on crappy tires, either. So I'm going to buy the RIGHT two tires now, and two more of those tires later.
I haven't found treadwear ratings anywhere near dependable in my experience. My ZE512s were rated at 420 and they lasted me 22k miles on a gutless FWD car. I did drive the ever-loving piss out of it but that doesn't change the fact that it was a gutless front-driver. The Eagle RS-A's on my dad's not-gutless front-driver lasted him over 4 years with a 260 TW. How did the Falkens screw that up? Even considering how much I drive, his tires still lasted 3 times as long with half the treadwear rating. I know the RS-As are garbage but that's beside the point. Or maybe it's not...
captainfalco wrote:I'm not sure the RE01-R's are going to do a whole lot better. You may want to step up to just a high performance all-season
I definitely don't want all-seasons as I have dedicated winter wheels and tires already. I need "real" tires. The wet weather stipulation is simply due to the fact that with the wrong tires this car is a handful in the rain.
BTW, nice Kids in the Hall avatar.