I'm alive!!! Haha! I'm here, just been extremely busy between work and working in the shop. I still get on here often, just haven't been as active in the last couple years.float_6969 wrote:Mean Green, he's alive!!!! Where ya been dood?
Yeah man, it worked great for me. I had a good friend re-tig the entire manifold and I also planed the flanges to ensure the surfaces were true. All in all, I had about $400 into the manifold when done, but still cheaper than some of the big name manifolds at the time I did it.dhen wrote:Thanks! That's exactly what I was looking for.
Looks like I just weld a couple of rods for support like in the picture and see what happens. Now I have to build a new down pipe, which is a pain with the tight space I have to work with.
As stated above, if done right you will have no issues. I've had KA-T, RB20, SR20 and CA18, all of which had eBay manifolds. I had them all planed, braced and re-welded as I posted above and never had any issues and trust me when I say, I never took it easy on my cars lolb210boostpimp wrote:im going to type this once.
the ebay manifold hold up great if you drive ur car evey once and a while. if you daily drive your car, then expect it to crack sooner than later. no matter how much bracing it comes with.
i have gone thru two top mounts. and i have tried to brace and have them fixed many times.. but not cigars. they continued to crack. and on top of that, not all the flanges were strait. ask you local machine shop how much they charge to straighen a flange? around here its 80 an hour. all the money that i put into those manifolds, i would have been better off just having a professional one made. which is what i did. i had it made of sch80 mild steam pipe with half inch thick flanges all the way arround. and never had a problem since. also if you have it made professionally made, all surfaces will be straight.
+2dash wrote:from reading on the net, the earlier ones were real problematic, then they seem to improve ?
daily driven ca18det powered b210 sounds hella cool. Any project page, links, etc. ?
That way works just as well, I just prefer to have the braces up top and out of the way or at least where they are easier to figure out how to get around if you need to take things off lol! I never had a failure on any manifold done that way. Having long braces going down from the bottom can create clearance issues when working on the car not to mention the manifold heats and cools as one my way, the braces being attached to other parts of the car that don't see extreme heat may cause it to flex in other ways. Believe it or not, when you dump the clutch from a dig, that motor mount bracket does flex.Buddyworm wrote:What MeanGreen said, sort of.
We typically brace them from underneath either to the block or to a motor mount, that way the brace is at a nearly vertical orientation and transmits any force from the weight of the turbo straight through the brace with reduced flexing.
dash wrote:alot of us "fools" wont believe that 'flexing' crap.... no matter where u stick you go pro -lol
what i did see on all three of my ca18s is that rubber mount completely torn away
lotsa factory cars brace their manifolds (turbo and na) to that motor mount bracket
Whatever works for us dummys, eh
ca18 stock mani leaves aalllottt of room around the head studs. Biggest I've seen on any motor
Absolutely, everything flexes and heats/cools at different rates and yes, to what degree is the real point. I wasn't exactly suggesting placing the go pro will physically show this, sorry if it came across that way that would be my mistake for not being clearer, but as I said you would be surprised what you can learn from placing one in your engine bay in different places as well as under the chassis at suspension points etc. Anyway, the thicker material of the 1/4" solid steel rod used for bracing will heat and cool at a different rate than the manifold, that is correct, however the thicker steel also heats slower and cools slower than the thinner manifold runners. I always match bracing rod size to the flange thicknesses. They will generally have a similar heat/cool rate. The thicker material will also have less give than the thinner metal used on the runners. When a manifold cracks, it generally cracks at the point of most hanging pressure which is at the head-to-manifold flange and the elbows in the runners on the top of the welds. This is my reasoning for bracing it the way I do because I always felt bracing it to itself made much more sense than trying to find something else to brace it to. Longer braces have a tendency to flex also. I'm not saying other methods are wrong, I just strongly feel my way is the simplest and most efficient. As I said, I have never had one fail.Buddyworm wrote:Everything flexes, as you said MeanGreen. The head shakes around separately from the block at high revs even. Question is to what degree, as you also said. I'm not convinced we've got the data to really sort out better from best.
A manifold braced with horizontal braces between head and turbo flange *might* heat at the same rate assuming the alloys are similar, for instance. But either way we're still dealing with numerous unknowns, such as the rate of expansion of those horizontal braces. They're going to get longer and push the turbo flange away from the head, but how much? More than the degree to which a metal bracket flexes? I can't say for sure but I suspect a gopro video is not sufficient evidence either way.
I do know that when you plumb wastegate dumps back into the downpipe you should ideally be using a flex joint specifically to deal with heat expansion/cycling. But that's as far as we're going to get here I think, unless we want to wind up splitting hairs on who's making the best unquantifiable compromise in this thread! lol
The message I take away from talking with our engine builder here is that isolating the manifold from twisting and flexing forces in as many axes as possible is the main consideration while also supporting the weight of the turbo.
Thats exactly what it came accross as, and dash was calling bulsheet on it.to what degree is the real point. I wasn't exactly suggesting placing the go pro will physically show this, sorry if it came across that way that would be my mistake for not being clearer
and they are alot heavier too. We also ARE talking about supporting the weight of the turbo + mani(+downipie). Of ourse there is comparison. FoolStock manifolds are far sturdier than an aftermarket ebay piece. There is zero comparison.
An OEM cast manifold is thicker, sturdier and engineered for the stress put on it by the weight of those tiny little snails that come from the factory. The weight of a top mounted T3/T4 or like I had, a Precision SC61 60 trim, is far greater than that of the stock T25 or whatever was on these engines... I just throw those things in the trash. These ebay brand turbo manifolds are thrown together half assed and the only engineering in them is the s*** they engineer when they write the descriptions on the websites posting them for sale. The aftermarket manifolds flex substantially more than a factory cast manifold period end of discussion. You can not compare a stock cast manifold to an aftermarket tubular manifold in any way whatsoever. They are absolutely 100% different.dash wrote:nope I'm not the only one who saying a gopro won't show you that deflection.Thats exactly what it came accross as, and dash was calling bulsheet on it.to what degree is the real point. I wasn't exactly suggesting placing the go pro will physically show this, sorry if it came across that way that would be my mistake for not being clearerand they are alot heavier too. We also ARE talking about supporting the weight of the turbo + mani(+downipie). Of ourse there is comparison. FoolStock manifolds are far sturdier than an aftermarket ebay piece. There is zero comparison.
Those ebay turbos have junk parts in them. They are cheap for a reason. I used one on my SR, but had it rebuilt and it was pretty good. When the turbo shop took it apart he said the shaft was not even balanced properly which is likely what causes the failures in those turbos. You get what you pay for... I refuse to use anything but the best anymore even if it takes a little longer to come up with the money for it. The piece of mind in the end is worth it.boost_boy wrote:I personally have tested the ebay T3/T4 top mount manifold as well as a chinese GT35R turbocharger and the results were not good. The chinese GT35R lasted about 6,000 miles and the thrust washer failed, but didn't smoke. The impeller would just stop turning under load which means it wouldn't produce hot air under load. The manifold started cracking, so I braced it. The manifold kept cracking until it completed seperated my turbocharger from the maniold itself. I still have that manifold if you guys want to see pics. Just disgusting. Just have someone make you a manifold of the s*** steam pipe and call it a day. That stuff does not buck or bend for anything.