Post by
Grant@tirerack »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/grant-tirerack-u8792.html
Thu Nov 06, 2003 2:14 pm
Yes, the Blizzak WS-50 is a soft handling tire. That's because it has a 13/32" tread depth and a 'micro cell' compound. It is designed to maximize snow and ice traction which it does better than anything we have tested. It is not intended to handle like an all season performance tire. They have the better traction in snow than the Arctic Alpin, better wet traction, better ice traction, but they do not handle as well in the dry. The Arctic Alpin handles better in the dry because it has 3/32" less tread depth, a firmer compound, and half of the sipes (the small slits in the tread blocks used to provide flex and 'biting edges' in snow and to allow the water somewhere to go) only go half way down into the tread depth. Yes, the Arctic Alpin and European style winter tires handle more like an all-season performance tire on dry but what are you more concerned with? That is the question you have to answer when looking at snow tires. If you live in an urban area where things are kept clean and you don't get a lot of heavy snow, the H rated tires are a great choice. They are safer in snow and ice than an all-season tire. They would be more of a compromise between handling and traction in snow and ice. It all depens on the conditions you are driving in and where you live. If you have severe conditions and, or a lot of ice, you would be safer with a more aggressive compound tire like the Blizzak WS-50 or the Dunlop Graspic DS-1. They both have more tread depth and squared off shoulder blocks for better traction. European type tires tend to have rounded shoulders and less tread depth for better cornering stability and handling.