Tire change = Drive Ratio change?

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
User avatar
PoorManQ45
Posts: 16676
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:13 pm

Post

It would seem to me that you could effectivly make your Q45 have the same total drive ratio of 4.08 gears by going with smaller rims/tires than OEM.

Is this true? If so, what would the overall height of the tire have to be to mimick a 4.08 rear-end. Also, why spend ~$1000 on new rear end gears when you could just buy a set of tires?

Also, changing to larger than OEM tires would cause the Speedo to read slower than you were actually going, correct? If that is true, wouldn't that cause the Governor to be raised? And, wouldn't larger than OEM tires allow you to get slightly better gas mileage because the Engine RPMs would be lower than OEM at the same speed.


User avatar
97Q45t
Posts: 511
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 4:54 pm
Car: Viper RT/10, Ford Explorer 4WD
Contact:

Post

It is possible, but not a wise choice.To stimulate a 4.08 gear change from a 90-93 Q with a final drive ratio of 3.538:1 and 215/65/15 tires (26.2" diameter), you will need to replace the tires with a set which has the overall diameter of 22.7". One size would fit that description is 195/50/15. My friend, that is the size of a civic tire. You would have to replace the the rims, and possibly tires every single time your car go over a moderate bump or pothole. Then it would cost more than $1000 for the gear swap.

User avatar
louiegz
Posts: 1312
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 6:17 am
Car: 2003 BMW 330i, 2007 Audi A3 3.2 Quattro

Post

97Q45t wrote:One size would fit that description is 195/50/15.
Not only that, that size tire would have a load rating of 82. Far short of the 95 load rating that you need for a 2 ton Q. It would not be safe.

User avatar
Rex
Posts: 16845
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2003 6:50 pm
Car: None
Location: South of ATL
Contact:

Post

As mentioned, it would require some very small tires which would look bad in the wheel wells, IMHO. But is a decent idea for some drag slicks assuming of course you can find some with the correct load rating.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

All correct.

Lastly, larger tires reduction of overall RPM's and subsequent improvement of overall mileage would be offset by the additional horsepoer required to set larger tires in motion (unsprung weight/mass).

So while your hypotheses are correct in theory, they have little if any real-world benefit.

User avatar
PoorManQ45
Posts: 16676
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:13 pm

Post

Ok, lets assume that a set of tires to simulate the 4.08 gears could be had with the proper load rating. Also, lets assume looks do not matter. Also, to circumvent the problem of a bent rim or poped tire(from tiny side-walls), couldn't you just get smaller rims, say 14~15in.

Would the 14 or 15in rims clear the Q45 brakes?

Would there be any other problems with going with smaller tires?

User avatar
elwesso
Posts: 30810
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 4:52 pm
Car: 94 Infiniti Q45t 5 spd
2007 BMW M Coupe
2007 Infiniti G35 S 6MT
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Post

I dont think 14s would clear the brakes... 15s dont leave mcuh room...

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Sure. You could put "theoretical" tires on "theoretical" rims with plenty of "theoretical" caliper clearance and theoretically do all those things.

The load rating of the tires, weight capacity of the wheels, ridiculous appearance and brake clearance issues don't go away just because you want them to.

There's several Lincoln and Cadillacs in South Phoenix running around on 13" Daytons with zero offset and 185/50/13 whitewalls - Might want to log onto lowrider.com and ask them.

User avatar
BigBodyQ45
Posts: 127
Joined: Mon Jul 12, 2004 1:33 pm
Car: 2002 Q45 Sport
Contact:

Post

AZhitman wrote:There's several Lincoln and Cadillacs in South Phoenix running around on 13" Daytons with zero offset and 185/50/13 whitewalls - Might want to log onto lowrider.com and ask them.
I think I have seen an Infiniti too.....


User avatar
JT_MONEY_2004
Posts: 409
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 12:14 pm
Car: 1990 Q45, Pearl

Post

I JUST PISS MY PANTS !!!

HAHAHHAHHAHAHAHAHH

User avatar
vicQ45
Posts: 1303
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 4:43 pm
Car: 1979 Cadillac Eldog, 1987 Wagovan, 1968 Firebird 400

Post

HAHAHAHA thats teh funniest thig ive EVER seen!

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

LOL - Good one, BBQ!

User avatar
elwesso
Posts: 30810
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 4:52 pm
Car: 94 Infiniti Q45t 5 spd
2007 BMW M Coupe
2007 Infiniti G35 S 6MT
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Post

I see those guys on caddy forums all the time

They get these itty bitty wheels, the big fleetwoods need about 99 load rating... "yeh man i gaht da 195-60-14, 88 load ratin'.. thass enough, ainnt it?"

Death on wheels

DR.Q
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 9:24 pm

Post

Some people really need to be slapped. I bet that thing handles awesome with ZERO contact patch!

User avatar
Jeff Williams
Posts: 3394
Joined: Fri Aug 02, 2002 4:17 am
Car: 1994 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti I30t
2004 Infiniti M45
71, 72, 73, 82 & 2000 Corvettes
Contact:

Post

The main difference in changing tire sizes, is that by going to a smaller tire size, would not net any more faster ET's because the car is now going slower, than before with stock tires.

The problem wiht bigger tiers, is weight, and mostly wind resistance at higher speeds. Taller tires usually give you worse gas mileage. I have experimented on my Nissan truck. I started out with 225/70/15 and went to 225/60/15, and tried 235/75/15 tires. The best mileage was the smallest tires, even though I was running higher RPM's.

A lot of drag racers, use the higher rearends, to offset the taller slicks they run on the back of the car.

The ral problem comes in, when the slicks "Stand" up. You have seen the top fuel cars, where the tires grow asround 25%

Q45tech
Moderator
Posts: 14296
Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2002 3:19 am
Car: 1990 Q45 342,400 miles 22 years ownership with original engine
1995 G20t 5 speed 334,000 miles 16" 2002 wheels - 205/50/16 Sr20ve vvl

Post

"I bet that thing handles awesome with ZERO contact patch!"

Tire size has nothing to do with patch size, the patch just rearranges its shape to support the weight via psi. Skinny width loooooooooooong shape.

The number of revoluution per minute gets increase so the tire has much much less time to cool when not in contact with road...............so these smaller diameter tires fry even in mild weather.

DR.Q
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 9:24 pm

Post

So a dump truck tire and a skateboard wheel(assuming it was inflatable and the same width) have the same contact patch with the same amount of weight on them?

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Not a fair assessment.

They don't have similar overall surface area.

The skateboard-sized tire would flatten (desperately attempting to approximate a sufficient contact patch) until it ran out of surface area.

User avatar
PoorManQ45
Posts: 16676
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 5:13 pm

Post

ROFL!!!

I think you may have taken it to an extreme.

DR.Q
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 9:24 pm

Post

It wasn't intended to be fair, I just took it to extremes to show how it does differ with diameter.

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

Great (albeit long) discussion here on this topic, illustrates both schools of thought.

http://forum.miata.net/cgi-bin...206;p=

maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

DR.Q wrote:It wasn't intended to be fair, I just took it to extremes to show how it does differ with diameter.
It doesn't really. Think of the load carrying capacity that includes the weight of the load carrying device (tire wheel combination).

User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

This matter can be easily resolved with an ink roller, a jack, a Q45, a tire gauge, a piece of butcher paper and 2 different width tires mounted on wheels.


User avatar
AZhitman
Administrator
Posts: 54542
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 2:04 am
Car: 58 L210, 63 Bluebird RHD, 64 NL320, 65 SPL310, 66 411 RHD, 67 WRL411, 68 510 SR20, 75 280Z RB25, 77 620 SR20, 79 B310, 90 Z32, 91 GTi-R, 92 Silvia Qs, 98 S14, 23 Z.
Location: Surprise, Arizona
Contact:

Post

HINT: I've seen the results (high school shop class) when the instructor ridiculed the enormous Gatorbacks on my '68 GS.

DR.Q
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 9:24 pm

Post


DR.Q
Posts: 384
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 9:24 pm

Post



Return to “General Chat”