Look at the odometer, the 93 belt should be replace at 60k and 94 and up belt 105k.k_hafid wrote:So how do you know when your timing belt is going bad?
Nok_hafid wrote: Are there any tell tale signs?
If the little numbers in the speedometer say "105,000" or more, or "210,000" or more, it's time.You'll know it went bad if half the valves are bent by the pistons walloping them. It's a very bad thing to try and outlive the factory specs.k_hafid wrote:So how do you know when your timing belt is going bad? Are there any tell tale signs?
brutal but trueDefiant wrote:You'll know it went bad if half the valves are bent by the pistons walloping them. .
'93 belts were supposed to be replaced at 60K.Quote » vehicle now has 123K.[/quote]You should be good to about 190K.Quote » What are the chances that they used a cavler plated belt when they did the t-belt job back in 2003?[/quote]Kevlar. All but certain. The kevlar belts were brought in around..... 94? Supposedly, the old-style belts should have been long-gone by '03. Pull a cover and look for a part number to be sure, it'll be on the outside of the belt. Quote »I am just curious. I don't plan on going over 150K without another t-belt change. [/quote]You should be safe for longer than that. As mentioned, if done by the dealer you're in the system. If not, catch as catch can.greenwar wrote:Here is a question, my 93 J30 had its t-belt replaced by the dealer at 97K for the first time,
I just had mine done last month. Full 60K kit and I paid 340 for parts and 483 for labor. 7 hours total labor for the full 60K kit.littlewillie wrote:The mileage was actually 143,030 when I had the timing belt changed. We bought the car in Sept 2004 with 138,167 miles on it. I knew nothing about this car when we bought it. I got on the forums & started researching the required maintenance. I went to the local Infiniti dealer & got the maintenance records printed. There was no record of a timing belt change. Two different brothers owned the car before we bought it. The one we bought it from did not do a timing belt change. He didn’t think the other brother had it done. I got all the replaced parts back & they were in great shape. I may have dodged a major bullet, but often times things are made to last longer than stated. With all the hoopla about getting the belt changed @ 60,000 (93) & 120,000 (95), I wonder how many folks have lost an engine due to a timing belt failure.
Willie