Bubba1 wrote:I got my R&T yesterday too. Though I haven't taken my R&T reading dump yet, glancing at their photos.
Bubba1 wrote:I got my R&T yesterday too. Though I haven't taken my R&T reading dump yet, glancing at their photos.
Also, 450 HP is a ****ton of HP when coupled with the fact that the power is available nearly instantaneously by a motor this potent and in a car that weighs a smidge over 3k lbs. The base C5's with 345 (or 350 if you have a 2001+) is very controllable, one of the reasons I went for a FRC instead of a C5Z as it's easier to drive at the limit (difference between 345 and 405 is extremely noticeable at knifes edge). I've driven C6 Grand Sports and C6Z's and 400+ is more than enough (500+ in the case of the C6Z).AZhitman wrote:Certain things are difficult. Fortunately, GM's ECU's are easily modded. The mods I had on mine (brakes, rotors, headers, intake, struts, catback, tires, wheels) are all pretty universal and easy to do.
3.9 for Stingray, same as C6 Grand Sport. In everyway, given the choice I'd rather have a C6 GS right now, but I've yet to drive a C7 or see how it functions in national level competition.gwoods wrote:I was curious about that power to weight. 450hp 450 torque and 3311 lbs... probably very quick around corners but in a straight line is it going to be faster?
How fast is the ZR-1 0-60? I think its 3.4-3.8 seconds depending on which magazine runs the test. So how fast can the stingray be? I am guessing at 0-60 in 4.0-4.3? What is it designed to be shopped against? non turbo 911's, 4.2 Audi R8's?
The ZL1 Camaro (4100lb curb weight 580hp) is only $54k has a backseat and the same tail lights and can do 0-60 in 3.9 seconds? The SS can do 0-60 in 4.7 seconds.
Insert obligatory V8 > * comment. Because it's true dammit.flohtingPoint wrote:Also, 450 HP is a ****ton of HP when coupled with the fact that the power is available nearly instantaneously by a motor this potent and in a car that weighs a smidge over 3k lbs.
If lambo doors are "mild" customization, I'm pretty sure they're not "tasteful" customization.. no offence to your neighbor.Bubba1 wrote:I got my R&T yesterday too. Though I haven't taken my R&T reading dump yet, glancing at their photos, I'm still not liking the frown looking camaro tail-lens rear. I don't mind the interior's all business look. My neighbor is now in the market for a new 'vette. So I plan to accompany him when he visits Kerbeck (local dealer that specializes in vettes) for test drivesgwoods wrote:New Road & Track came today its on the cover nice article inside and I had to use the bathroom anyhow. :-)
The release photos don't do a very good job compared to the car mag photo's? I've almost got over the 4 tail lightsAs info, he's selling his garage kept, mildly customized 2001 C5 (lambo doors, ghost flames and a "split window") if anyone is interested.
Same with me, except I still only love the R32. I'll pass on the rest.float_6969 wrote: The first time I ever saw an R32 GTR, I was in love. Have been ever since.
No offense taken. I initially thought the same way when he told me he was getting lambo doors, but then I relented when I saw his doors were hinged two ways, so that they open both the traditional way and the "lambo" way. His customized touches are pretty subdued. He' won many cruise night trophies with that car. Here are a few shots:mechanicalmoron wrote:If lambo doors are "mild" customization, I'm pretty sure they're not "tasteful" customization.. no offence to your neighbor.


Why is this atrocity "subdued" for Vettes when it would be flamed as absolute rice other cars?Bubba1 wrote: