

rc1honda wrote:I think Ron Paul is the only genuine presidential potential candidate America has had in decades. I agree with almost every idea he has.carloslebaron wrote:The funny situation is that the majority mocks of Ron Paul like if he is crazy, but actually, by listening him with more attention, he is the only candidate that hits reality, while the rest only make promises on the air. Who, after Ron Paul, is asking to audit the FED?
What is your wealth denominated in? Do you have tangible things of value or are you completely invested in paper and computer wealth? The cruise to crash continues unabated. Washington still doesn't get it. rather than take the S&P downgrade as what it is, tough love, the government lashes out with an SEC investigation. Sounds like textbook behavior for a addict cornered and forced to confront their addiction.As worldwide debt problems increase, the rush to buy and sell (gold) is only picking up steam
Europe is teetering on the edge. Germany has been that family member that worked hard and did good that all the loser relatives hit up for money. Germany just closed their wallet. Timmay flew over to ask them to keep playing along and they said "scheize."European Central Bank Governing Council member Jens Weidmann told Germany's Spiegel magazine in an interview he considered it wrong to "throw out all established principles of monetary policy by citing a general emergency."
In a preview of an interview to be published in the new edition of Spiegel, Weidmann, head of the Bundesbank, said: "Once people start to use monetary policy there will always appear to be reasons suggesting it should continue to be used.
That's why I don't think President Obama's on his way out. At least not yet. It's way too early to tell, but can you see the right being energized enough and the left/center being worried not too much about any single candidate in those debates? President Obama has to lose to someone, and I really can't figure out who he'd lose to.Eikon wrote:...but unfortunately, I don't like any of the current contenders on the right. They all scare me a bit.
I take it back. Talking with TMS in another thread, I think I convinced myself that he is on the way out. I don't think Europe's going to bail out Greece, and then Greece won't be able to pay its banks. And then its banks won't be able to pay anybody else. And then the banks they owe throughout Europe are going to have their next crisis, and then that's going to slip the world back into another recession. President Obama will get the blame (though it's not anywhere close to being his fault), and he'll lose re-election to probably Mitt Romney. Rick Perry might hold onto his lead in the primaries, but once the recession hits, Mitt Romney will look to the Republicans the way he's looked to the rest of us: as the more capable economic mind (or, "more capable mind" period), and he'll eventually get the nod. President Obama's base will be disheartened when they're not looking for work, and the TEA Party will be angrier than ever. If the Republicans can hold onto the TEA Party anger and focus it towards voting for Romney (rather than writing in Ron Paul), President Obama will be out of a job come January 2013.IBCoupe wrote:That's why I don't think President Obama's on his way out.
Things are heating up.“Given the uncertainty around the euro zone, it’s only natural that we would seek to reduce any potential downside risk. As a result, we’re not holding government debt of any peripheral EU country and have sought to reduce our exposure to banks in these countries,” Lloyd’s Finance Director Luke Savage told Dow Jones Newswires on Wednesday.
I turn on CNBC and all I hear about is "Asia is slowing down", "the FEDs speech was a very bad thing", "possibility of Asian housing crisis", "possible Euro depression and a double dip recession for the US" etc...themadscientist wrote:Things are heating up.
Read...Eikon wrote:All I can tell is that being in the USA doesn't seem quite as bad now as it did a year ago. Sounds like EU and Asia are going to have a rough couple years.
That's our money.To the list of mega-corporations bailed out by the U.S. government, we now must add — Europe. In an announcement that rocked financial markets worldwide, the European Central Bank revealed yesterday a concerted effort in combination with four other major central banks — the Bank of England, the Bank of Japan, the Bank of Switzerland, and yes, the U.S. Federal Reserve — to use dollars rather than euros in an attempt to paper over the European Union’s economic woes.
This will hurt US exports which will kick this duct-taped together economy square in the nuts. If you drank that rosy economic outlook s*** the government was pushing you should start to feel the numbness by now.Friday the 13th was not a good day for Europe.
In the midst of the European trading day, news began circulating that credit agency Standard and Poor's would downgrade many eurozone countries, including France, Italy and Spain. Given Europe's deepening financial problems, that move had been widely expected.
S&P, which took away the cherished AAA rating from U.S. government securities in August, took the same step with France Friday, cutting the rating one notch to AA+.
S&P also downgraded eight other countries, including Austria and Slovakia by one notch and Italy, Spain and Portugal by two notches. Cyprus, Malta and Slovenia were also downgraded. S&P gave a negative outlook to 14 eurozone countries, meaning there is a one-in-three chance they could be downgrded again in 2012 or 2013. Only Germany and Slovakia were given "stable" outlooks.
America cannot complyThe global financial crisis of 2007 to 2009 generated fresh pressure for international regulations to protect against future meltdowns. One body that took on a more wide-reaching role was the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, long considered a private club for the world's leading central bankers. The committee's most sweeping accomplishments have been the Basel rules on banks' capital requirements, which culminated in 2010 with the development of the Basel III accord on capital and liquidity standards. However, many national governments are facing significant resistance from the international financial sector, which has argued that the Basel standards will slow growth and damage the fragile global economic recovery. Other critics say the framework does not go far enough to stem risk in the international banking system.
There could be ramificationsWASHINGTON—The US Treasury announced Friday that it would not implement the Basel III rules for strengthening banks on January 1, saying the banks were not yet ready to meet the tougher capital standards.
“Many industry participants have expressed concern that they may be subject to a final regulatory capital rule on January 1, 2013, without sufficient time to understand the rule or to make necessary systems changes,” the Treasury said.
Now, part of Basel III that I would like to focus on is the increased requirements for Tier 1 assets in portfolios. Tier 1 assets are considered the least risky and are thus weighted at 0% when grading an institutions financial rating. Discussions about the standard got interesting over the summer.New rules forcing banks to roughly triple the size of capital buffers they hold are set to be phased in over six years starting in January, after each country has finalized its own version.
But the United States and Europe, home to most of the world's largest banks, are still at the drafting stage, prompting speculation that the Basel III timetable may be postponed.
Juan Manuel Valle, head of banking supervision at the Mexican Treasury, said no country had suggested a delay but any that failed to meet the deadline would face pressure from their peers.
"For the ones that don't have regulations in place in January, the question will be, what kind of punishment will they face?" he told Reuters on the sidelines of Group of 20 meetings, adding that details would only be worked out after countries become "non-compliant."
At the top of the proposed changes is the new list of “zero-percent risk weighted items,” which now includes “gold bullion,” right after “cash.


I shuddered when I reread my post.Jesda wrote:The GOP is about to nominate its own John Kerry. It would take a catastrophe for this president to not be reelected. I suspect it'll be a difference of 100 or more electoral votes in Obama's favor.