The FX50 Hits 60 in 5.2, How Fast Will the M be?

Forum for Infiniti M35 and M45, and Nissan Fuga owners.
User avatar
Mark Linkous
Posts: 765
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:51 am
Car: 2012 Infiniti M37x

Post

Hello,In the June issue of Motor Trend, the new FX 50 is tested. The new VK50VE engine coupled with a 7 speed transmission definitely catches Infiniti up to the field. To the tune of a 5.2 second 60 run and a 13.7/102.1 quarter mile. If the upcoming M has more horsepower than the FX50's 390, like last time, a mid to upper 4 second run certainly seems plausible.Thoughts,M.L



THT
Posts: 215
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2005 6:14 pm
Car: 96 Legacy L AWD 5spd wagon, 04 M45
Contact:

Post

Mark Linkous wrote:Hello,In the June issue of Motor Trend, the new FX 50 is tested. The new VK50VE engine coupled with a 7 speed transmission definitely catches Infiniti up to the field. To the tune of a 5.2 second 60 run and a 13.7/102.1 quarter mile. If the upcoming M has more horsepower than the FX50's 390, like last time, a mid to upper 4 second run certainly seems plausible.Thoughts,M.L
The better question would be, how easy would it be to swap a VK50 in for the VK45 in our Y34s??

User avatar
Mark Linkous
Posts: 765
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 9:51 am
Car: 2012 Infiniti M37x

Post

Hello,interesting "is the juice worth the squeeze" proposal.Cheers,M.L

Sazar
Posts: 94
Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:43 am
Car: Infiniti M-45 2003

Post

Mark Linkous wrote:Hello,In the June issue of Motor Trend, the new FX 50 is tested. The new VK50VE engine coupled with a 7 speed transmission definitely catches Infiniti up to the field. To the tune of a 5.2 second 60 run and a 13.7/102.1 quarter mile. If the upcoming M has more horsepower than the FX50's 390, like last time, a mid to upper 4 second run certainly seems plausible.Thoughts,M.L
Emissions, gas mileage and transmission consideration have to be taken into account but a sub 5 second clock should be possible and therefore something sub 13 in the 1/4 mile if configured correctly.

sr79labrat
Posts: 168
Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 8:02 pm
Car: 03 M45, 91 Turbo Legend, 79 F-Body

Post

Sazar wrote:
Emissions, gas mileage and transmission consideration have to be taken into account but a sub 5 second clock should be possible and therefore something sub 13 in the 1/4 mile if configured correctly.
SICK! I still think we could run faster for less by slapping a turbo or 2 on the M. THat is quick though!KW

MagicM
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 9:28 pm
Car: 2007 Black/alu trim /black interior M35x 2005 Range Rover HSE 2000 Range Rover p38 4.0SE

Post

I think the real question is "WHEN" are they going to add in the 5.0liter V8 / or 3.7L, but i hope they add the 3.8 Naturalaspirated GTR instead of the g37 one. Probably wont see it until 2010/2011 so a little ways away still . Actually forget the 5.0Lter they should add a GTR package on the M and stick in the 3.8 TwinTurbo version and make it push 500+ horses, make it compete with the BMW M series.

User avatar
CakeDaddy
Posts: 1107
Joined: Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:58 am
Car: Y34,Pathfinder SE, Mercedes CLK500AMG Sport Pkg & A Fleet of Premium Avis Rental Cars

Post

Mark Linkous wrote:Hello,interesting "is the juice worth the squeeze" proposal.Cheers,M.L
THT wrote:
The better question would be, how easy would it be to swap a VK50 in for the VK45 in our Y34s??
yes! juice vs. squeeze. May not be worth it as far as $ or time, If you had a 77 civic I could better understand a project such as this, but.... not on this M. I'll just sit back and see what Infiniti does with the new engine


Return to “Infiniti M35 and M45 Forum”