Well said comrade! Everyone in favor of one party rule, extend your right arm in the air in salute, and repeat after me "Heil Hillary!"R/T Hemi wrote:Life will be much better without Republicans.
Queue a nice funeral dirge for the GOP. Preferably something quick, then we can get on with some wild rock-n-rolling, beer drinking, celebrating of Hillary's victory!
It won't be coming in 2016Bubba1 wrote:..... But the RNC desperately needs a change in direction.
there are many countries that can suite your mentality. feel free to go there and spend a few years living under "equality" and "liberty" lol. you'll be back; i promise. venezuela, china, russia, etc all come to mind.R/T Hemi wrote:Life will be much better without Republicans.
figures.... you came, spewed some BS, and refuse to debate/hearing the other side.There is really no point in arguing my point here.
after 2 terms of hillary, there will be little to nothing left of this country. including your job, income, property, etc. lets take a look at:telcoman wrote:It won't be coming in 2016
Perhaps by 2024 after two terms of Hillary?
Then again perhaps never again![]()
Telcoman

Consider this a friendly warning. No vulgarity. We're closely monitored by Google and postings like this cause major problems.R/T Hemi wrote:IMAGE REDACTED. Violation of house rules.
![]()
-Rogue One
And so does Fox news!Bubba1 wrote:...... But the RNC desperately needs a change in direction.
telcoman wrote:
Trump keeps repeating the false news as fewer and fewer voters believe anything he says
Telcoman

So now you're rejecting CNN, NBC,CBS, and The Washington Post because they refute your bizarre fantasy? You've gone from drinking the DNC's koolaide, to mainlining the stuff. Just remember the old saying, history has a way of repeating itself.telcoman wrote:^^^^^^^^
It appears you are looking in all the wrong places
http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/201 ... id=rrpromo
https://europe.newsweek.com/polls-presi ... 517051/amp
"The main forecasts continue to predict Clinton as the winner next week. According to FiveThirtyEight, Clinton has a 66.5 percent chance of winning the election, as Trump’s probability hovers around 33 percent. FiveThirtyEight predicts Clinton will take 294.2 electoral votes, while Trump will take 243.
Over at The Upshot, Clinton has an 84 percent chance of winning the election, compared to 16 percent for Trump. The Upshot also spoke with a number of teenage girls about the election and the effect it’s had on their feelings about themselves. A quarter of the girls polled said Clinton’s candidacy has “made them more likely to seek positions of leadership,” according to the poll. However, around half of the girls polled said Trump’s comments about women—he allegedly called former Miss Universe Alicia Machado "Miss Piggy" and "Miss Housekeeping"—have affected the way they think about their own bodies.
Outlier of the day: Friday brought us some alarming statistics on perceptions around voter fraud in this election. On the campaign trail, Trump has repeatedly said the 2016 election is rigged and that he may not accept the outcome—unless he wins."
Trump has still not produced his tax returns or admitted that he was wrong on his birther beliefs.
Unfit for POTUS
Telcoman
You might as well cite HuffPo as both Snopes and Politifact have been shown to be shills for the left.srellim234 wrote:No, Howie isn't rejecting them. Five-thirty-eight is talking about the ODDS of a Clinton win, not polling numbers.
The Hillary campaign did NOT start the birther campaign no matter what the right wing media would like you to believe.
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinton-s ... -movement/
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter ... -clinton-/
etc., etc. all explain why your belief that she did is false.
You are correct; neither is fit for the office but that belief is nothing new. Most reasonable people have known and/or said that for a long time. Now it's come down to deciding which one will cause the least damage to America and the world. Right now that would be Clinton because she is a known entity and a Clinton presidency would leave in place the checks and balances provided by the three branches of government. Allowing the Republicans (or the Democrats) to control all three branches would be the destruction of individual civil liberties and rights. Corporate rights and a "Christian" version of Sharia law will become the law of the land.


Actually that's decimation times 80.7 (deci meaning ten). But who's counting?Rogue One wrote:We tend to focus on the loss of the presidency as the example of Democratic failure. That's blinkered. Since 2008, by our estimates, the party has shed 870 legislators and leaders at the state and federal levels -- and that estimate may be on the low side. As Donald Trump might put it, that's decimation times 50.
Most have the Ds taking a majority in the House so if there is a place to bet where the Ds are the underdogs in the House, this is the perfect place to make easy money.