This has been going on for some time. Remember the Dodge Colt?srpowered240sx wrote:interesting. dodge buys a car to resell as opposed to building their own.
welcome to the late 70's.srpowered240sx wrote:interesting. dodge buys a car to resell as opposed to building their own.
thems fighting words for blynd_snypernsrZ32 wrote:Ah....a badge that fits the little POS
what wrong with versas?nsrZ32 wrote:Ah....a badge that fits the little POS
thanks240sx_Guy wrote:
thems fighting words for blynd_snyper
Nothing at all. Its just Nissan's econobox. Its a good car for what it is. But notice that Nissan doesn't let Dodge rebadge the Altima, Maxima, 350Z, etc.blind_snyper wrote: what wrong with versas?
Don't forget the Stealth/3000GT or the Eclipse/Talon. Slightly different body work, but same powerplant, etc...Cali 2 Balti G wrote:NOt sure what the dissapointment is about - aren't you glad that more Versas are selling . more sales, more potential for aftermarket, etc. The logic behind doing it is cost. We've seen this most recently by manufacturers entering the SUV market by buying a rebadged existing product.
Rebadging, platform sharing etc. is an old practice.
Some that I remember are
Sterling 4 door sedan based on the 1st Gen Legend (this one had a dif body and interior - but all else was Legend)
1st Acura SUV which was a Isuzu Trooper.
1st Honda SUV was a Isuzu Rodeo.
Chevy Nova (disgrace to the name) which was really a Toyota Corolla.
Ford's small pick-up was a Mazda or Vice Versa (no pun)
Remember the Cadiillac Cimaron which was a cavalier or something like that.
nsrZ32 wrote:Nothing at all. Its just Nissan's econobox. Its a good car for what it is.
The Versa is a good choice, if your local Honda dealer has already sold their most recent shipment of Fits.OriginalWheelman wrote:
It's quicker than a Civic, but uses more gas. It's bigger than the XA, but does not accel as fast. It's a great car if you want to corner fast, rather than drag. But it only handles well after you replace the stock tires. The stock suspension is too soft to do a good launch with out unloading the front axle. The open diff makes it even worse. But it is a comfortable car to drive everyday, and an easy car to drive like a reasonable human being. That is, once you get used to the drive by wire, and a learning ECU that forgets how to drive in town after a few hours on the high way and vice versa. Oh then there is the phantom clutch. No feedback at all. Half the time it feels like the clutch is all the way out and it is no where close. So I guess it's quirky, but livable, as long as only one person drives it.
Well #1 I got my friend his Versa for $11,200. And #2 the Fit is a lot harder to get into from a fat guy perspective.charlieo wrote:
The Versa is a good choice, if your local Honda dealer has already sold their most recent shipment of Fits.
Mercedes has 0 interest in the Viper. While they like fast cars with huge engines, they like fast cars with huge engines and lots of electronics and other goodies. That's not the Viper. Plus, they've already got that great stonker of a 6.2L biturbo. Plus, with the Viper comes Dodge, MB doesn't want Dodge.OriginalWheelman wrote:No way.
Subaru should buy Jeep. Hyundai would likely want Chrysler. I would put more money on Mercedes to take the Viper, than Toyota. They SLR'd the engine when they tweaked it last year, so they have some experience with it. That would make Merc more desirable as well, but as I think about it, would probably devalue the Dodge brand beyond recovery. But I would love to see the Viper in Merc silver with the Merc badges.
Well, I could see Hyundai getting involved in picking off parts of Chrysler. They are actually intertwined already, the 2.4L engine from the PT Cruiser and the 2.7L V6 in the Avenger are actually Hyundai designs that were adopted by Hyundai, Chrysler, and Mitsu in various vehicles. Plus, Hyundai has already made it clear that they want to compete in an upscale market.OriginalWheelman wrote:Subaru should buy Jeep. Hyundai would likely want Chrysler.
Considering the fact that the Enzo is an amazing machine and the MC12 is Maserati beautiful, I'd have to say that anyone who complains about that deserves a black eye.Jesda wrote:Notice no one here is complaining about the Maserati MC12 being a rebodied Ferrari Enzo.
I'm not sure why anyone is at all surprised that an American car company is selling a rebadged Nissan. Doesn't anyone recall the Mercury Villager??Ever Victorious wrote:See, anyone who mistakes the Tribeca for an SUV needs their head examined. All that thing is is a cracked out minivan without sliding doors.
NO Subaru enthusiast likes the Tribeca. I'm not even sure that Subaru likes the Tribeca.
TMS - I used to own one. (for those who are lost, he is referring to a BRAT) Sadly, the jump seats got pirated before the truck came into my hands.