Hmm, so if I am understanding everything that I have been reading, if you were to put a 256i/264e setup, your power would be there faster than in this current setup, but wouldn't be as high overall?DrifterProdigy85 wrote:
Heres my car with the Brian Crower 264 Cams. GT2871R .86 @ 16psi. Perfectly flat torque curve.
Basically, I am looking for about 350 hp, with a decent power curve...Someone said try the 2871R .63, with cams and a tune, would get me there about 3800 rpm. Any clue what I would get with the .63 trim, and the 256i/264e? Or would it be better overall to go with both 264?DrifterProdigy85 wrote:Youll just have more torque in the midrange while spool up occurs. With the 2871R .86, its always gonna be laggy, making 18-20psi around 4500rpm. Its always best to match the cams with what the turbo is gonna do, cause face it, a 2.0L engine isnt gonna make power unless the turbo is involved. My graph just looks like late power because i had a broken exhaust manifold and the dyno pull was started at 3krpm instead of 2500rpm like most others. If you want more low/mid range power, go with a turbo thats gonna give it and not try to compensate by cams cause its just gonna hurt the performance in the end.
i know this is a late reply BUT i only just joined up so stiff ****norcals14 wrote:thanks for the advice so far what do you guys think about the 264 int 272 exh idea? im a newb when it comes to cams but i think i will go with hks...
this helps me out alot because this is hwat i am aiming for. but do you need any other head work besides cams for these results???DrifterProdigy85 wrote:450hp and drifting isnt needed plus good luck finding good boost response for that kind of power. Your best bet is the 2871R .64 with HKS 264 Step 2 Cams. Probably be around 375whp with 20psi around 3600-3800rpm. Youll also be able to run mid 11's on drag radials.