tension rod arrow direction?

A Q45 forum / Cima forum for the President of Infiniti's lineup. Brought to you by Infiniti Parts USA, your OEM source for Q45 parts!
captainluigi
Posts: 679
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:15 pm
Car: 1996 q45t
Contact:

Post

going bleary eyed reading all of those previous posts on this same question. never did find the difinitive answer. which way do it go? FSM correct or wrong?


maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

All arrows point towards front of car. Your tension rod bushings should have been installed that way.

FSM is wrong.

Think there are two previous threads on this topic.

captainluigi
Posts: 679
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:15 pm
Car: 1996 q45t
Contact:

Post

more than two actually. none until now (including yours) made the definitive statement tat FSM was wrong. all left it open ended. unless another poster offers up a contrary idea i will go with that. does any one know why the tension rod bushing should point forward? just curious. thx

User avatar
elwesso
Posts: 30810
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 4:52 pm
Car: 94 Infiniti Q45t 5 spd
2007 BMW M Coupe
2007 Infiniti G35 S 6MT
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Post

i think its probably less important which direction the arrow is pointed, just so that the arrow is pointing down the line of action along the centerline of the tension rod.

captainluigi
Posts: 679
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:15 pm
Car: 1996 q45t
Contact:

Post

ok then. maybe that is the case. does anyone really KNOW as in the definitive of KNOW? obviously the arrow is there for a reason. as far as i can tell brian assumes it points forward because other nissan arrows point forward. not sure i buy in to that logic. wes says forward or backward just not any of the other 358 degrees. with respect to both of those opinions will dennis please chime in & give the one & only true god answer? please.

thx

User avatar
mxr662
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:35 pm
Car: 1990 Q45 Desert Sand 81k Sold

Post

zerothread?id=293326

I think book is wrong.

User avatar
mxr662
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 3:35 pm
Car: 1990 Q45 Desert Sand 81k Sold

Post

captainluigi wrote: going bleary eyed reading all of those previous posts on this same question. never did find the difinitive answer. which way do it go? FSM correct or wrong?
Maybe a poll is in order?

User avatar
elwesso
Posts: 30810
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 4:52 pm
Car: 94 Infiniti Q45t 5 spd
2007 BMW M Coupe
2007 Infiniti G35 S 6MT
Location: Indiana
Contact:

Post

i'd listen to Brian on this one...

maxnix
Posts: 22627
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 8:11 pm
Car: 1995 Infiniti Q45
1995 Infiniti Q45t
2000 Infiniti Q45

Post

Here's my point, all other parts with arrows have the arrows pointing to the front, the direction of travel.

Heath reported when his original tension rod bushings were removed from his low mile 1990, the arrows were oriented forward.

Hence, it is my opinion and my opinion only that the FSM is in error.

captainluigi
Posts: 679
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:15 pm
Car: 1996 q45t
Contact:

Post

brian, you are 100% correct. upon removal of existing the arrows point forward. now if i had only gotten the correct bushings. frustrating day in the trenches. bad crank pulley, wrong bushings, skinned knucks=no progress. wahwahwah.


Return to “Q45 Forum / Cima Forum”