haha...of course a honda owner would say that--considering no hondas come from the factory turbocharged...emperor_lunchbox wrote:does the .50 ar mean 50 trim?The guy selling this said it's off of a Honda and will not work for a Nissan?That doesn't make sense to me.Is there something I am missing?
Care to explain further? Are you saying if two housings of different A/R, but using the same size (trim) wheel, the larger A/R would flow more at a given rpm?KATwo40 wrote:A/R on the compressor had nothing to do with lag. It only determines flow capabilities.
Yes. The A/R is essentially referring to the size of the nozzle. The air going through the turbine has to go through the nozzle. The Larger the nozzle, the more it can flow. However, smaller nozzles increase the velocity of the gas going through it, effectively providing more exhaust energy at lower airflow rates. This gives you less lag. But at higher airflow rates, it will become a restriction, much like having too small an exhaust on your car. Most people will probably be looking for a good compromise of both spool-up and flow.IWannaS15 wrote:Care to explain further? Are you saying if two housings of different A/R, but using the same size (trim) wheel, the larger A/R would flow more at a given rpm?
Check out Porsches new 997 turbo thats coming out. It uses variable turbos with virtuall no turbo lag, makes 470 lb of torque at 1900 rpms-5000 rpms. Its freaking nuts, More torque than a V10 can make down low.KATwo40 wrote:I'm seriously taking a hard look at the VATN turbocharger. (Variable Area Turbine Nozzle) Diesel engines have been using them for a while now, and I just can't understand why gasoline engines aren't using them. Perhaps the cost is the deciding factor.