Supercharger/Turbo question

The club for Nissan Maxima and Infiniti I30 / I35 owners, and the official home of Maxima Club of America!
User avatar
Gman8990
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:25 pm
Car: Pearl 1999 Nissan Maxima GXE

Post

I am thinking about adding a supercharger to my maxima... its a 4th gen... im looking at 2 diff kinds, 1 will give me 2-3 psi more than usual and another will save me 30% fuel economy and give me 10% hp... which one? an also... this summer i am thinking about replacing my 3.0 L V6 with a 3.5 out of a newer model... is that possible?

thanks guys


MTZI30
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:47 pm
Car: 2000 Infiniti I30t
Location: Santa Barbara, CA

Post

Yes i beleive you can put a vq35 in your car. Try a search im almost sure someone here has done it. As for the boost...that is a huge upgrade. Not only will you need the SC parts but you'll need the supporting cast. Im not really sure how much boost these things can take stock but im guessing youll need to beef up the transmission and bigger brakes/suspension work would be a good idea.

User avatar
kzoosho
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:04 am
Car: Turboed 1997 Nissan Maxima SE

Post

Gman8990 wrote:I am thinking about adding a supercharger to my maxima... its a 4th gen... im looking at 2 diff kinds, 1 will give me 2-3 psi more than usual and another will save me 30% fuel economy and give me 10% hp... which one? an also... this summer i am thinking about replacing my 3.0 L V6 with a 3.5 out of a newer model... is that possible?

thanks guys
3.5 has been done many times. As far as boost what are you looking at. I have a turbo and a super car so i cacn help you either way .And gas is going to decrease not increase just to let you know.

User avatar
Sentientbydesign
Posts: 5993
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:21 am
Car: 03 Evo VIII - 330 AWHP
05 Subaru Legacy GT Stg 2 - Sold
05 G35 6MT Coupe - 278 WHP - Sold
04 WW Evo VIII - 302 AWHP - Ex's
96 I30 - Sold
Contact:

Post

In the future. Stick to one thread.

Posting the same question multiple times will put you on the list.

Also, post more details. 2-3 psi more than normal doesn't mean anything. NORMALLY, our cars are NA. So does that mean that this S/C will give you 2-3 psi? I doubt that.

The likelihood is that you'll burn through more gas going super or turboed. Not because it's less fuel efficient, but because you'll be more apt to using the power you have.

I can almost guarantee that your transmission won't hold a VQ35DE on boost. You're looking at over 300hp to the Crank and the transmission was only supposed to deal with 190hp. So look into beefing up the transmission or swapping one from a newer gen.

User avatar
Gman8990
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:25 pm
Car: Pearl 1999 Nissan Maxima GXE

Post

thanks sentient... and sorry for the repeat... the other is a little more in depth on the engine part

User avatar
kzoosho
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:04 am
Car: Turboed 1997 Nissan Maxima SE

Post

As far as transmission goes you will be fine man. Im running close to 400 at the wheels thru a stock 2001 transmission.

User avatar
Sentientbydesign
Posts: 5993
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:21 am
Car: 03 Evo VIII - 330 AWHP
05 Subaru Legacy GT Stg 2 - Sold
05 G35 6MT Coupe - 278 WHP - Sold
04 WW Evo VIII - 302 AWHP - Ex's
96 I30 - Sold
Contact:

Post

kzoosho wrote:As far as transmission goes you will be fine man. Im running close to 400 at the wheels thru a stock 2001 transmission.
But he'll have an older 4th gen transmission?

User avatar
Gman8990
Posts: 168
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2008 2:25 pm
Car: Pearl 1999 Nissan Maxima GXE

Post

yah but i wont have quite 400... more like 320 ish

User avatar
kzoosho
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:04 am
Car: Turboed 1997 Nissan Maxima SE

Post

Its been done th
Sentientbydesign wrote:
But he'll have an older 4th gen transmission?
ru 4th gen trannies time and time agan. Hell i know someone that put 470hp/500ftlb threw a 4th gen transmission. He also tracked the car.

mtcookson
Posts: 2204
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:43 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX
1992 Iinfiniti Q45
and much much more
Contact:

Post

kzoosho wrote:And gas is going to decrease not increase just to let you know.
This isn't always true, especially if going to a turbo or s/c system from a stock setup. Basically, all of the performance parts you're putting on the engine actually make the engine more efficient. Now, you can actually make the engine more or less efficient at certain points in the RPM. If the modifications make the engine more efficient all throughout the rev range its very likely you'll get better fuel economy.

What a lot of people don't understand is that even if you're making 200 hp or 500 hp... that's not what you're putting down when you're cruising. You're making very little power while cruising and basically, the more efficient you make everything the less power needed to sustain cruising speed and that is where you can get better fuel economy.

User avatar
Sentientbydesign
Posts: 5993
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 8:21 am
Car: 03 Evo VIII - 330 AWHP
05 Subaru Legacy GT Stg 2 - Sold
05 G35 6MT Coupe - 278 WHP - Sold
04 WW Evo VIII - 302 AWHP - Ex's
96 I30 - Sold
Contact:

Post

That's great in theory, but in reality, I haven't heard of any stock to turbo conversions that have lead to increased efficiency.

I will admit that if done "right" efficiency can be gained, but if your cruising RPM is low enough to not create boost, then essentially you've made the exhaust/intake system less efficient by creating some back pressure and restrictions on the intake side.

Explain to me how the rule of thumb on the G35 transmission is to stay under 400hp, but at 4th gen Maxima transmission can handle 500

I sincerely doubt that a sedan transmission was built to handle more torque than a sports coupe.

mtcookson
Posts: 2204
Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2002 12:43 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX
1992 Iinfiniti Q45
and much much more
Contact:

Post

Its simply driving habits. Most people going to a turbo or s/c setup will tend to drive in boost quite often making it less efficient.

I turbocharged my Maxima a while back. I wasn't making a whole lot of power but it was a lot more than stock (160 bhp vs. about 215 whp) since I was using a small turbo on a very poor tune. On top of having a poor tune and a terrible intake and exhaust setup I still managed 29.4 mpg on the highway. With a better intake and exhaust and some tuning it would have easily been over 30 mpg oh the highway, better than stock.

In town though... that was another story. I couldn't keep my foot off the throttle in town so I got about 14 mpg, definitely much worse than stock.

User avatar
kzoosho
Posts: 484
Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2007 3:04 am
Car: Turboed 1997 Nissan Maxima SE

Post

Not said it was built to handle it but it does .

User avatar
blackmax23
Posts: 163
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 7:20 am
Car: 1999 Nissan Maxima SE-L

Post

The STS remote-mounted turbo system for the corvettes will give you 2-3 mpg more over stock. It can be done, and yes you're right, it's all about efficiency. GMan, I just hope you're prepared for what it really takes to supercharge/turbocharge the max, or any car for that matter. Not only do you have to super upgrade all fuel delivery and cooling systems, but you must think about how you're getting that to the ground. We've beaten the transmission issue into the ground yes, but you gotta think about your axles handling the horsepower too. Also, think about engine mounts, you'll be getting gobs of wheel hop if you're not careful. I just hope you're prepared for how much time and $$ it'll take to be a reliable sc/tc car. After install, tune, suspension, axle, etc. mods, you're talking well over 10 g's.


Return to “Maxima Forum & I30 / I35 Forum”