its the hippies that refuse to believe diesel is actually a cleaner product for the environment then gas. not only do cars achieve more power/mpg's using less fuel, but the soot settles down to the ground faster than anything coming out of a gasoline car. diesel soot is now a days is filtered and burned off, but even if any turbo by-product is emitted, it settles quicker than gasoline emissions that stay suspended longer in the atmosphere. silly hipsters lolkerrton wrote:I know its shocking, look at the Rogue/Qashqai in Europe and we North Americans are shocked! Like you said, the small 1.6 diesel is available, producing 280 lbft of torque and 55 mpg, absolutely unbelievable! And auto manufacturers all give the same response: "North America is not a suitable market for diesel powertrains indicated by our market research blah blah..." If people knew how amazing these powertrains are, and learned about the misconceptions (i.e. no black smoke, noisy etc.), I think everyone would be screeming for a diesel!
hipsters dont even wanna hear this simple argument: coal miners are using diesel carts underground. those diesel engines have such great filtration & emission systems that the air that comes out of the exhaust pipe is breathable by humans.kerrton wrote:Yeah new diesels have a lot of emissions control measures that themselves are costly, including urea injection into the exhaust etc., but I would take a modern diesel over a complex gasoline hybrid-electric system any day. Modern diesel emissions are very clean, the efficiency is roughly equal to hybrid electrics, and diesels are more durable and reliable in theory - just the fact that there is no expensive battery pack with a finite lifespan is enough to give the win to diesel. Who wants to spend thousands of dollars replacing a battery pack every 8-10 years to the cost of say $8000-$10,000?
Regardless of which is better, in North America neither are very popular. The vast majority of vehicles are regular gasoline combustion engines which too are getting more efficient all the time but still cannot touch diesels for power and efficiency.
very well said. your 100% right, diesel does have a huge stigma. but people need to understand that the noise has been reduced via piezo injector. this piezo injector takes what would ordinarily be one squirt of fuel, and divides it up into up 9 tiny squirts of fuel to not make one BANG of fuel explosion, but 9 tiny flames of power, thus reducing that typical diesel engine Knock that people are accustomed too.Rogue Noob wrote:The Element forum had a strong contingent of "give us the Diesel" as well but I think the truth is diesel has a stigma in the US and that is just one of the problems. Every diesel I see has a black bumper (referring to VWs), most people only know diesels as semis or F-350 and they are loud as hell, stereotypically slow (remember the Mercedes or Volvo back in the day?), and Diesel is more expensive now. I think if they just brought them here, let people test drive them without knowing the fuel source there may be a shot to convince people it is a great option.
I do remember reading that Europe does not have the same emissions standards as the US which is why they can get such better MPG. Now, that confuses me how a F-350 will pass emissions but a smaller diesel from Europe won't but I am very ignorant to diesel technology. If they felt they could make money in this market with them, they would make it happen IMO. I'd be down for one for sure though!