suggestions to make it quicker?

Nissan 300ZX technical discussion forum: Maintenance, performance, installations, modifications, how-to's and troubleshooting.
User avatar
NorCal_N/A
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:54 pm
Car: 1993 300zx N/A
Contact:

Post

so i have a 93 n/a. yes i know you cant do much with a n/a. right now it has headers, intake, exhaust, what else coukd make it quicker? any suggestions are welcome! thanks.


User avatar
Ace2cool
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:21 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX TT
1966 Datsun Fairlady 1600
2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600
1974 Honda CB550 Four
2009 Ford F150 Lariat
Location: Murfreesboro, TN

Post

Pulleys. Pretty much all there is left.

My suggestion in it being an N/A would be to upgrade suspension. Suspension on an N/A is much more gratifying than any engine performance mod, ever.

awesomekasim
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:49 pm
Car: 1991 300zx TT 5spd

Post

Crank and water pump pulley, Dual intake with Selin device, lightweight driveshaft

vulcanrush
Posts: 1183
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:41 pm
Car: 93 300zx n/a to tt

Post

awesomekasim wrote: Dual intake with Selin device
i don't think they work for nas.

Z31toZ32
Posts: 1673
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 12:43 am
Car: 1999 Infinity QX4
Location: Denver, CO

Post

^ this guy put one one (or so he says) and had a pretty impressive gain. you can't tell if it was from the tune or the intake because they were done at the same time.

max power from an NA: http://specialtyz.com/blog/?p=783

awesomekasim
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:49 pm
Car: 1991 300zx TT 5spd

Post

They work for NA's. There are a few who have done them. My friend put one on his j30 and saw 13whp gain (multiple dynos back to back before and after)

awesomekasim
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:49 pm
Car: 1991 300zx TT 5spd

Post

Oh and i forgot, lightweight clutch/flywheel combo. With all that, response will be much better. Some NA's have broken the 220who barrier. Beyond that, you will probably need internal engine work. With 220whp and suspension mods, it will be a fun car to drive with great response.

User avatar
NorCal_N/A
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:54 pm
Car: 1993 300zx N/A
Contact:

Post

ok thanks guys. i apprciate it. and with my taxes i plan on lowering it on TEIN s-techs and concentrating on suspension. then im just going to just start saving for the TT swap.

vulcanrush
Posts: 1183
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:41 pm
Car: 93 300zx n/a to tt

Post

awesomekasim wrote:They work for NA's. There are a few who have done them. My friend put one on his j30 and saw 13whp gain (multiple dynos back to back before and after)
Factory 120+k Miles Engine
Stillen Headers
SZ Hi-Flow Cat Pipes
SZ Single Oval Catback
Regrind Cams
Tomei Adj Exhaust Cam Gears
SZ Flywheel & Sport Street Clutch
Electric Cooling Fans
Selin Dual POP & Translator
UD Underdrive Pulley
SZ Tuning

in that link to specialtyz's blog, the car puts out 225rwhp+?

if a stock na is 222hp to the crank, let's say you deduct 15% due to friction (30hp about?), all those mods bring you back up to the 222rwhp+, right? i have a tough time thinking the selin dual maf's is responsible for HALF the gains (the 13rwhp you're saying).
sure it's going to increase some power, but not worth it, the whole selin pack is 400 bucks+, not including the two pop filters, and a second maf, 550 bucks+ easily. but if you're going to do a tt-swap, sure, get it.

awesomekasim
Posts: 51
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:49 pm
Car: 1991 300zx TT 5spd

Post

I didnt see specialty Z's blog yet. There is a guy named rockchucker on 300zxclub who i believe has 222whp with every bolt on and NO engine work whatsoever. He is also running the selin device. I have seen many stock NA dynos and they usually put out 175 to 185 whp. The 13whp may not be exact but my friend did 3 dyno pulls back to back, installed the selin, then 30 min later did 3 more dyno pulls and saw an average of 13whp in gains and 9 tq. Ill tell him to post his dyno sheets.

NA's are hard to squeeze power out of after that though. TT swap is ideally the way to go if you want more power but NA with 220whp would still be a fun car.

The selin device itself is about $280. You can find an n62 MAF at junkyards (sometimes) for $20. Get 2 90 degree elbows and a second air filter and you are probably looking at $400 if you know where to shop. Also you can still use the same setup if you go TT. Definitely a good modification if you ask me

4Zwin
Posts: 15
Joined: Wed Jun 16, 2010 9:43 pm
Car: 1991 300zx N/A
Location: Nashville Tennessee or Washington D.C.

Post

if you are really trying to make the NA faster then save the money and either do the tt swap or get a tt.

User avatar
BigTDogg (MA)
Posts: 4194
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:26 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT
Location: Boston MA

Post

Push it down an icy hill

User avatar
Ace2cool
Posts: 11650
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:21 pm
Car: 1991 Nissan 300ZX TT
1966 Datsun Fairlady 1600
2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600
1974 Honda CB550 Four
2009 Ford F150 Lariat
Location: Murfreesboro, TN

Post

^^He's in Cali. None of those out here.

User avatar
BigTDogg (MA)
Posts: 4194
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:26 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT
Location: Boston MA

Post

He is in Northern Cali.. Head to a mountain and get a radar gun :-)

User avatar
P3ngy
Posts: 316
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 8:29 am
Car: 1994 300zx Twin Turbo(Sold)
1992 240sx (Sold)
Supra Swapped 95 E36 M3 - (Sold)
93 240sx (Daily Beater/Slider)

Post

BigTDogg (MA) wrote:Push it down an icy hill

^

simali
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:03 am
Car: 1989 300zx z32 SWB NA

Post

I have an 89 swb na slicktop.....custom ecu, dual air intakes, underdrive pulley, electric cooling fan and no a/c and it runs 263 bhp at the wheels all with standard internals

User avatar
BigTDogg (MA)
Posts: 4194
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 8:26 am
Car: 1990 Nissan 300ZX TT
Location: Boston MA

Post

simali wrote:I have an 89 swb na slicktop.....custom ecu, dual air intakes, underdrive pulley, electric cooling fan and no a/c and it runs 263 bhp at the wheels all with standard internals

:bs:

Show the dyno or it didn't happen.

simali
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2011 9:03 am
Car: 1989 300zx z32 SWB NA

Post

OHHHHHH cant wait to get home to the scanner this weekend......:) might still have the first run on the dyno before running the new map.....base map and 20 mins tweekin' gave me 261.5 at the fly

nissanfreak12
Posts: 1709
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 4:07 pm
Car: 92 300zx 2+2 TT
Location: Denver, CO

Post

simali wrote:OHHHHHH cant wait to get home to the scanner this weekend......:) might still have the first run on the dyno before running the new map.....base map and 20 mins tweekin' gave me 261.5 at the fly

Was the 20 min tweeking for you or the car? :inoutgay:

Z31toZ32
Posts: 1673
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 12:43 am
Car: 1999 Infinity QX4
Location: Denver, CO

Post

simali wrote:OHHHHHH cant wait to get home to the scanner this weekend......:) might still have the first run on the dyno before running the new map.....base map and 20 mins tweekin' gave me 261.5 at the fly

how are you measuring flywheel horsepower on a dyno? anyway, if you are claiming 261 at the flywheel, that is nbd because it translates to maybe 215 whp.

Vendetta
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2010 8:56 pm
Car: 91 300ZX

Post

The only thing you can really do beyond what you've done to make power on an N/A is cams. The guy on SZ's blog only had reground cams, and they said that he could make more power with high-lift cams. Apart from that there's not really much you can do with an N/A to make more power.

It's kinda sad to see 2.0 liter N/A Honda engines that can produce close to 300 WHP, but a 3.0 liter can't. Oh well that's technological advancement for ya I guess...

vulcanrush
Posts: 1183
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 2:41 pm
Car: 93 300zx n/a to tt

Post

Vendetta wrote:The only thing you can really do beyond what you've done to make power on an N/A is cams. The guy on SZ's blog only had reground cams, and they said that he could make more power with high-lift cams. Apart from that there's not really much you can do with an N/A to make more power.

It's kinda sad to see 2.0 liter N/A Honda engines that can produce close to 300 WHP, but a 3.0 liter can't. Oh well that's technological advancement for ya I guess...
what 2.0 liter na honda engines are close to 300whp?
the best one, i think, is the honda s2000 engine, and that's 240hp to the crank.
torque, there's no comparison.

User avatar
Z-owned
Posts: 3487
Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:56 pm
Car: 93 N/A Z32
90 VW Corrado
01 mr2 spyder
Location: Auburn, WA.

Post

vulcanrush wrote:
Vendetta wrote:The only thing you can really do beyond what you've done to make power on an N/A is cams. The guy on SZ's blog only had reground cams, and they said that he could make more power with high-lift cams. Apart from that there's not really much you can do with an N/A to make more power.

It's kinda sad to see 2.0 liter N/A Honda engines that can produce close to 300 WHP, but a 3.0 liter can't. Oh well that's technological advancement for ya I guess...
what 2.0 liter na honda engines are close to 300whp?
the best one, i think, is the honda s2000 engine, and that's 240hp to the crank.
torque, there's no comparison.
The h22a's are a pretty impressive 4cyl for a n/a. My corrado's 1.8l (g60) is an impressive little engine as well but then its forced induction.

User avatar
Z32TT
Posts: 1355
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2008 12:19 pm
Car: 90' 300ZX TT
Location: Sacramento

Post

Z-owned wrote: The h22a's are a pretty impressive 4cyl for a n/a.
Especially if its an H2b setup


Return to “300ZX (Z32) Technical”