dude thats such crap!telcoman wrote:Probably because republicans pay less in taxes they have more dollars to spend in strip clubs

saying things like "small" is simply pulling a convenient word out of the sky.hannibal wrote:Only a small percentage of households that dont pay taxes are receiving public assistance.
Romney and those other Americans parking money in offshore accounts to avoid US taxation.ImStricken wrote:so who has more money in their pockets by not paying taxes?telcoman wrote:Probably because republicans pay less in taxes they have more dollars to spend in strip clubs
are you under the influence of anything today? lol/jktelcoman wrote:Romney and those other Americans parking money in offshore accounts to avoid US taxation.
It may technically be legal but anyone wishing to run for public office should be disqualified by the voters.
If you want to live in this great country you need to pay taxes.
Those that don't earn enough to pay income tax will be subsidized by the lucky millionaires and billionares.

they voted for a president that avoided paying his tuition loans, even tho his tax records already showed he was technically "wealthy" and earning 6 figures.telcoman wrote:The tax issue needs to be fixed.
Do the American people want to vote for a president that avoids paying taxes?
Obama's tuition was not an issue in 2008.ImStricken wrote: they voted for a president that avoided paying his tuition loans, even tho his tax records already showed he was technically "wealthy" and earning 6 figures.
maybe you dont see it, but the rest of the folks see it = ALL politicians are tax avoiding slime balls. yours, mine, or the others; doesnt matter.
"Obama's tuition was not an issue in 2008." - not for liberals like yourself. but for others, yes it as an issue. and its tough bringing up an issue when only ONE news outlets is conservative.telcoman wrote: Obama's tuition was not an issue in 2008.
6 figures is the starting salary for a first year associate attorney, High six figures for a Harvard JD degree that made law review.
You sound like you believe all the crap spoon fed by faux news.
Barack Obama was fully vetted. Only a few wingnuts believed he was not born here and was a Muslim.
Romney on the other hand not only refuses to produce tax returns that he is obviously hiding something but also refuses to go on the sunday morning talk shows.
I still remember Obama telling OReilly on Fox to shut up and let him finish his answer to a just asked question.
Romney got no balls and is a lightweight like Palin
Mitt the twit
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/07/27 ... -to-worse/
Forget trying to guess who they voted for. Lets try to get the numbers straight first.ImStricken wrote:saying things like "small" is simply pulling a convenient word out of the sky.hannibal wrote:Only a small percentage of households that dont pay taxes are receiving public assistance.
FACT:
When Social Security, Medicare and unemployment benefits are included, nearly half of the nation lived in a household that received a government check, according to the analysis of third-quarter 2010 Census data. Food stamps in 2011, hit a record 44.2 million.
again, who do you think they voted for?
"Did you really throw student aid into this picture?" - no i didnt. i simply said that obama didnt pay his student debts for a while, after telcoman wrote: Do the American people want to vote for a president that avoids paying taxes? that was just to prove that BOTH political parties have less than admirable tax and financial personal histories.hannibal wrote:Did you really throw student aid into this picture?
Last thing, I hope youre not someone who believes the majority of households receiving assistance are black families. Just because thats the picture the news shows when discussing welfare doesnt mean its true. In fact, its not...
Seth can probably elaborate on this more if he jumps in here but why would anyone try and pay off student debt faster than required? Student loans tend to carry a low interest rate. There is an opportunity cost for paying it off sooner rather than using the extra money to invest. As long as the ROI on the investment is higher than interest rate, you'll be better off in the long run.ImStricken wrote:WTF does that have to do with anything? it still doesnt explain why he couldnt pay off his student owed debt even tho he was making 6figures.
it also depends if its federal, or private loans. id pay off private loans of ASAP.C-Kwik wrote:Student loans tend to carry a low interest rate. There is an opportunity cost for paying it off sooner rather than using the extra money to invest. As long as the ROI on the investment is higher than interest rate, you'll be better off in the long run.
Not sure where you got those numbers. Do they include Social Security benefits? I dont consider SS income to be welfare (in the truest sense), as workers pay into the system then get it back when they retire. The vast majority of SS recipients are white (over 80%??).ImStricken wrote:"Last thing, I hope you're not someone who believes the majority of households receiving assistance are black families." - In sheer numbers, white people are the largest recipient because they are the largest race in the country. But if you consider the rate at which a race receives welfare compared to its percentage of the population, blacks are by far the largest recipients.
White 38.8%
Black 39.8
Hispanic 15.7
Asian 2.4
other 3.3
There is a huge issue with UNDERemplyment. This is very difficult to measure. But it is true that people with graduate degrees make more over their careers than those without. Even during this Great Recession, unemployment for people with graduate degrees was 3.6% in 2011 compared to ~8% overall. Underemployment does help keep this number low.ImStricken wrote:now a days when folks with masters degrees are homeless, or flipping burgers. there is ZERO guarantee for ROI with most degree's. thats all i read about now a days is kids sitting at home and the only work they can find is mediocre minimum wage. folks go from making great money to then being fired.
in my opinion, really low or not- its still wasting thousands. You will ultimately pay less for your education by paying off your loans early. You will improve your debt-to-income ratio by eliminating that loan from your financial plate. This will free up more money for a home down payment, etc. I live by a rule of paying any debt back as fast as possible. if that means not going on vacation this year - so be it.
it only makes sense that those on welfare will always vote democrat. it would be counterproductive to vote republican as a welfare recipient, no?hannibal wrote:it would be premature to assume the large number of white households receiving SS income vote democrat as well
Two things. First of all, dont call SS welfare. People recieving it have been paying in all their lives. Its not their fault that the government forced this plan on them, then spent the money elsewhere and now current workers are having to pay for them. You cant put SS in the same group as welfare. Now some forms of disability are certainly welfare, some of the things we've labeled as disability are kinda crazy.ImStricken wrote:it only makes sense that those on welfare will always vote democrat. it would be counterproductive to vote republican as a welfare recipient, no?hannibal wrote:it would be premature to assume the large number of white households receiving SS income vote democrat as well