flohtingPoint wrote:I'd never sacrifice contact patch to be m4d tyt3.
Again, it's all about application (and honesty)
Stretched tires are fine when someone is building an outrageous boso car with lots of oni camber that scrapes frame. Those cars drive to meets and back at 30mph and are designed to do nothing but look crazy and be as loud as possible.
On anything that anyone is going to take to a track, or even daily drive with any frequency, crazy stretch is retarded.
I've had a hankering to build an uber-low stupid car lately, but I'll never present any illusions that I plan to either track it or drive it to work. It's fine for silly cars to be silly cars, but it's idiotic when people claim their silly cars are zomgseriousjdmracecars.
EDIT: And to pre-empt the comment, it's ridiculous to argue that all cars need to either be functional daily drivers or track machines.
If this was the case, we'd have no T-buckets, no rat rods, no chopped '51 Mercs, no Blastolene Tank Car, no super-low VW buses, etc.
It's not always about functionality, sometimes it's just about the car as something cool to look at and cruise around in. It's only lame when people take form and label it as function. This is why people who do "form" stuff with imports get a bad name, because unlike T-bucket owners, a lot of them say that they own track cars when they wouldn't know a track car if they were struck by one.