stretched tires suck

A General Discussion forum for cars and other topics, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to NICO!
gnvarnadore
Posts: 1092
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:54 am
Car: 89 240sx Base Coupe(daily/project) 91 240sx SE Coupe(sold) 92 240sx SE Coupe(sold) 89 240sx Base Hatch(sold) 93 240sx SE Hatch(SOLD!!!)
Contact:

Post

stretched tires suck and this is why, its hard to tell by looking if the tire is low on air. i was leaving for work this morning and went around a corner and was sliding like crazy and i knew i didnt hit ice so i stopped and thought to myself wtf? i got out and looked at my tires and i'll be damned the tire had to have been low on air and the bead popped going around the corner cause the rim was damn near sitting on the ground. my rims are 17x9 +15 offset and the tires on the rear are 235/40/r17 so now im thinking its time to get overfenders and cut the rear fenders out and run a bigger tire so it doesnt have to be stretched and run the risk of this ever happening again. now im going to be late to work cause i have to wait for the tire shop to open so i can get some tires on a set of teardrops i have because im not running these 17's anymore until i can put a nice beefy tire on them and have clearance. gotta love mondays.


User avatar
numbnuts240
Posts: 32380
Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 4:17 pm
Car: 1999 Ford Exploder 4-door 5spd
1974 Datsun Fairlady-Z 250GT
2011 Ford Focus
2010 Mazda 3
Location: TJ

Post

gnvarnadore wrote:stretched tires suck

User avatar
MinisterofDOOM
Moderator
Posts: 30928
Joined: Wed May 19, 2004 5:51 pm
Car: 1962 Corvair Monza
1961 Corvair Lakewood
1974 Unimog 404
1997 Pathfinder XE
2005 Lincoln LS8
Former:
1995 Q45t
1993 Maxima GXE
1995 Ranger XL 2.3
1984 Coupe DeVille
Location: The middle of nowhere.

Post

Sidewall is good for you.


User avatar
93coupe
Posts: 12924
Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 3:03 pm
Car: crap
Location: Maryland

Post

They look dumb anyway.

gnvarnadore
Posts: 1092
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:54 am
Car: 89 240sx Base Coupe(daily/project) 91 240sx SE Coupe(sold) 92 240sx SE Coupe(sold) 89 240sx Base Hatch(sold) 93 240sx SE Hatch(SOLD!!!)
Contact:

Post

yeah sidewall is good, rubber band tires are an epic fail. i guess i cant complain too much as the tires are the same ones that were on the car when i bought it about a year and a half ago.

User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

Stretched tires do indeed suck if actual function is a consideration at all.

Of course, for boso/yanky/shakotan cars, it's de rigueur.

User avatar
Salem240
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 10:27 am
Car: '05 Pathfinder 4X4 SE
'98 240SX SE

Post

Dude.... 235/40? You srsly need more sidewall and width for 9"s.. Hows about 255/40/17 and roll and pull? I think you could pull it enough without buying overfenders, if anything dial in some neg camber.

User avatar
car nut
Posts: 3246
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:33 am
Car: GT500.
Location: The hottest neighborhood in America (Forbes)

Post

Overfenders look good on coupes.

User avatar
rc1honda
Posts: 585
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:25 am
Car: 1992 240 sx
2007 BMW 335xi
2008 Honda CBR1000RR
Location: Chicago burbs

Post

235/40 on a 9in isnt that streched. Hell im running a 225/40 on a 9 1/2j. Gotta clear the coils. But more tire is good. I just don;t wanna have to pull the fenders to much or get overs. To much work. Keep up on tire presuure and it shouldn;t be much of a problem.

duffman1278
Posts: 6816
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 3:09 pm
Car: 89 240sx Hatch, the wildcats!

Post

wah wah wah my tires are stretched!

looks like you just have a case of the mondays

User avatar
dasoupdude
Posts: 4803
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:26 pm
Car: 2005 Nissan 350Z
Location: Palm Beach, FL / Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Post




User avatar
DrifterXRPS13
Posts: 12391
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2003 4:14 am
Car: 1993 Acura Integra LS, 1998 Nissan 240SX SE 5sp. KA-T,2004 Honda CBR 600RR, 2005 Suzuki GSX-R 600, 2013 Harley Davidson Iron 883, 2014 BMW S1000RR
Location: Vernon Hills, IL
Contact:

Post

i'm sorry dude, but that looks like donkey poop...how can you drive around on the street wtih the "rim" of the wheel exposed....no offense to anybody but that is worse than a beaners car.

User avatar
car nut
Posts: 3246
Joined: Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:33 am
Car: GT500.
Location: The hottest neighborhood in America (Forbes)

Post

DrifterXRPS13 wrote:i'm sorry dude, but that looks like donkey poop...how can you drive around on the street wtih the "rim" of the wheel exposed....no offense to anybody but that is worse than a beaners car.
Mmmmm curbrash.

User avatar
bobotech
Posts: 4886
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 10:26 pm

Post

Stretched tires do look awful as pointed out by the above picture. Yuck.


User avatar
MellowZ32
Posts: 27320
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 8:29 pm
Car: Pornographer's car
Location: Parts Unknown

Post

DrifterXRPS13 wrote:.no offense to anybody but that is worse than a beaners car.
what's wrong with my car?!


User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

Red Z33 could be lower

User avatar
flohtingPoint
Posts: 3564
Joined: Tue May 13, 2003 2:46 pm
Car: 2004 Z16 Corvette Z06
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Post

I couldn't care less about looks. The lack of effectiveness and pointlessness of stretched tires gets me. Why would someone throw a smaller tire on a wheel that can fit a much bigger one? I'd never sacrifice contact patch to be m4d tyt3.

User avatar
E7-S14
Posts: 5214
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:20 pm
Car: ess 14 foo!
Contact:

Post

run a 255 Gregg.itl look bad a**.just roll and pull the fenders

and get someone who KNOWS what there doing to do it. dont wanna f up your qp.

User avatar
s0m3th1ngAZ
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 10:11 am
Car: 96' Miata
2014 Focus ST

Post

As hash said...they only belong on show cars and only on those japanese rat roads (Boso...whatever)Oh and they only work when you cant even fit a plastigauge in between the fender and tire.

Veriest1
Posts: 3686
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:23 pm
Car: '96 BMW M3
'93 Nissan 240SX coupe dd

Post

flohtingPoint wrote:I'd never sacrifice contact patch to be m4d tyt3.

User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

flohtingPoint wrote:I'd never sacrifice contact patch to be m4d tyt3.
Again, it's all about application (and honesty)

Stretched tires are fine when someone is building an outrageous boso car with lots of oni camber that scrapes frame. Those cars drive to meets and back at 30mph and are designed to do nothing but look crazy and be as loud as possible.

On anything that anyone is going to take to a track, or even daily drive with any frequency, crazy stretch is retarded.

I've had a hankering to build an uber-low stupid car lately, but I'll never present any illusions that I plan to either track it or drive it to work. It's fine for silly cars to be silly cars, but it's idiotic when people claim their silly cars are zomgseriousjdmracecars.

EDIT: And to pre-empt the comment, it's ridiculous to argue that all cars need to either be functional daily drivers or track machines.

If this was the case, we'd have no T-buckets, no rat rods, no chopped '51 Mercs, no Blastolene Tank Car, no super-low VW buses, etc.

It's not always about functionality, sometimes it's just about the car as something cool to look at and cruise around in. It's only lame when people take form and label it as function. This is why people who do "form" stuff with imports get a bad name, because unlike T-bucket owners, a lot of them say that they own track cars when they wouldn't know a track car if they were struck by one.

User avatar
dasoupdude
Posts: 4803
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:26 pm
Car: 2005 Nissan 350Z
Location: Palm Beach, FL / Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Post

HashiriyaS14 wrote:It's fine for silly cars to be silly cars, but it's idiotic when people claim their silly cars are zomgseriousjdmracecars.


I agreeez.





woops.


User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

Dasoupdude wrote:


I agreeez.
Purpose-built drift vehicles are sort of an odd sub-category. They're innately silly anyway, because competitive drifting as a motorsport is infinitely sillier than any boso car will ever be. It's a blast and I definitely watch it, but it ain't exactly WRC. It's the automotive equivalent of "Dancing with the Stars"

That said, being incredibly low and running oni camber/stretch seems to work just fine for them in many cases and you see it even on "pro" cars.


Papi Chulo
Posts: 2395
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:51 am
Car: 72' Datsun 510

Post

gnvarnadore wrote:stretched tires suck
gnvarnadore wrote:my rims are 17x9
gnvarnadore wrote:tires on the rear are 235/40/r17
You don't have stretched tires. Not really a "proper" size, but not a stretch..... at all.


User avatar
dasoupdude
Posts: 4803
Joined: Mon Mar 17, 2008 2:26 pm
Car: 2005 Nissan 350Z
Location: Palm Beach, FL / Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Post

I (kind of )used to like the look of stretched tires. But then found out it wasn't exactly safe to have excessive lateral force on a tire that's not even seated properly.

Sure the tire is functional, just not as functional.

I'm glad they don't use that ideology when they create things such as condoms or seatbelts.
HashiriyaS14 wrote:
That said, being incredibly low and running oni camber/stretch seems to work just fine for them in many cases and you see it even on "pro" cars.
This 'could' be one.

I have yet to see a manufacturer sanctioned road race team use stretched tires.

User avatar
RCA
Posts: 8225
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 8:09 am

Post

Drifting...
HashiriyaS14 wrote: It's the automotive equivalent of "Dancing with the Stars"
Bumper sticker naow!

gnvarnadore
Posts: 1092
Joined: Fri Jan 05, 2007 8:54 am
Car: 89 240sx Base Coupe(daily/project) 91 240sx SE Coupe(sold) 92 240sx SE Coupe(sold) 89 240sx Base Hatch(sold) 93 240sx SE Hatch(SOLD!!!)
Contact:

Post

just want to let everyone know that its the same set up that was on my car when i bought it, tien ha coilovers, rolled and pull fenders, and 215/45 up front and 235/40 in the rear. i like the look but function over form right? i like good contact with the road. grip>slip

User avatar
HashiriyaS14
Posts: 14298
Joined: Fri Dec 05, 2003 8:02 pm
Car: '95 Nissan 240SX
'08 Honda Accord
'08 Honda NPS50
'03 Kawasaki Ninja 250
'60 Honda Super Cub
Location: DC Metro Area
Contact:

Post

^^That Evo doesn't have much stretch and while it's low, it still has some clearance in the wheel well.

The Sun Evo is also a very serious time attack car. There isn't anything on that car that isn't functional.

And it has my favorite modern wheels in the whoooooooole world. Yay.

User avatar
adrianfromthecastle
Posts: 18849
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2005 5:36 am
Car: 1992 Nissan 240sx
Location: California

Post

you guys are complaining a 235/40 is too much of a stretch on a 17x9?

you're killing me Larry!

User avatar
PyR0NiAk
Posts: 3851
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:29 pm
Car: S13 SR W/ T2 GT3071R .86AR, JWT S4 Cams, 810cc Injectors,Z32 MAF, JWT tuned ECU 87mm 9:1 Compression CP pistons, Manley Rods
Location: Ohio
Contact:

Post

DSD... Those don't look stretched at all...


Return to “General Chat”