stock acura rsx-type s 6mt vs. altima coupe 3.5 se cvt

A General Discussion forum for Altima owners, and a great place to introduce yourself if you are new to the NICOclub Altima Forums!
VQmaniaq
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 8:26 pm

Post

just curious, who wins? the cvt 3.5 coupe, or the 6mt type-s, my cousins been buggen me that he'll womp me, but i beg to differ or feel like taking him at the track.


VQmaniaq
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 8:26 pm

Post

bump

lets throw in another scenario

stock civic si, stock rsx type-s, stock altima coupe cvt 3.5

who wins?

User avatar
prlwhitecoupe
Posts: 515
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 7:55 pm
Car: 2008 Pearl White Altima Coupe 2.5 S w/CVT & Premium Pkg.

Post

Hmmm... RSX or even Si against the V6 A/C....look at the torque differences...and I bet the A/c would smoke'm off the line atleast!

Even in terms of Power to Weight ratio as well..I still think the A/C would take them...

VIDEO whenever it goes down!!!

User avatar
JLAUDIO85
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 3:24 am
Car: 08 Black Altima Coupe 2.5SL CVT.
Location: Toronto

Post

wow tell ur cousin he's retarded loli have 2.5 cvt and i raced my buddy's rsx type-s stock 6mt. its got like 200ish hpi hate to say it but it was on the steeet near my house. lolit was a rolling start and we were head-to-toe and about in 3rd-4th gear, he downsifted and took me out by little but i kept up for a long time no jokes i thought i have some chance to win it evntho rsx type s is light n got some lil more power than minebut yea 3.5 VQ engine will smoke his rsx

User avatar
adidas2go
Posts: 4495
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:49 am
Car: Cycle through all kinds of cars, trucks, motorcycles, and boats 🤙
Once upon a time: 1st turbo Altima Coupe
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post

VQmaniaq wrote:just curious, who wins? the cvt 3.5 coupe, or the 6mt type-s, my cousins been buggen me that he'll womp me, but i beg to differ or feel like taking him at the track.
The A/C wins. A/C CVT 0-60 in 6.3 sec. The rsx 0-60 in 6.5 if its even an 05-06. In 02-04 0-60 in 6.7. After that a*s whooping from the start. It will continued by the 70hp edge of the A/C. The rsx is almost 300 pounds lighter. However thats not going to be enough of a weight difference to beat out 70 more hp. It would be a close race but the A/C takes it in a 1/4 mile by a car length if its a stock for stock race.

VQmaniaq
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 8:26 pm

Post

well i aint gonna race him on the street, thats not me, nor is racing period.

my cuzz has a hondata reflash, intake and exhaust..is that close enough to stock for me to teach him a lesson at the track?

User avatar
adidas2go
Posts: 4495
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:49 am
Car: Cycle through all kinds of cars, trucks, motorcycles, and boats 🤙
Once upon a time: 1st turbo Altima Coupe
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post

Hmmm it really depends on how good the re flash is. Intake and exhaust are only going to help him minimally. Just do it. Whats the worst that could happen?

jmicha3l
Posts: 62
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:34 am
Car: 07 Nissan Altima 2.5S black
Contact:

Post

VQmaniaq wrote:just curious, who wins? the cvt 3.5 coupe, or the 6mt type-s, my cousins been buggen me that he'll womp me, but i beg to differ or feel like taking him at the track.
3.5SE CVT > Type S.

I know because I have one. Although, it would be a really close race. Just do it bro

User avatar
JLAUDIO85
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 3:24 am
Car: 08 Black Altima Coupe 2.5SL CVT.
Location: Toronto

Post

IMO i think 'stock' rsx type-s Vs. A/C 3.5 CVT, i think A/C will smoke type-s...but ur cousin's chipped but still i strongly believe 3.5 A/C will smoke itjust take him to the track and show him what u got lol

User avatar
mcheddadi
Posts: 6666
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 2:24 pm
Car: R8

Post

adidas2go wrote:
The A/C wins. A/C CVT 0-60 in 6.3 sec. The rsx 0-60 in 6.5 if its even an 05-06. In 02-04 0-60 in 6.7. After that a*s whooping from the start. It will continued by the 70hp edge of the A/C. The rsx is almost 300 pounds lighter. However thats not going to be enough of a weight difference to beat out 70 more hp. It would be a close race but the A/C takes it in a 1/4 mile by a car length if its a stock for stock race.
ahem! A/C CVT is faster than 6.3sec, don't down your own coupe!

2008 Nissan Altima 3.5SE CoupeTRANSMISSION: continuously variable transmission

Zero to 60 mph: 5.8 secZero to 100 mph: 15.7 secStanding ¼-mile: 14.6 sec @ 97 mph

http://www.caranddriver.com/sh....html

bigred311
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:48 am
Car: altima coupe '08 3.5SE

Post

by the way we walk stalk civic si's, im talking buses, over 4 cars in first if you can launch, that was also on the street not track, so id hate to think of what it would be on the track

User avatar
jdshift
Posts: 5980
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:06 pm
Car: 2019 Nissan Altima
2015 Nissan Altima 3.5
2014 Infiniti QX70 S 5.0

Post

The 3.5 coupe would own that RSX no questions asked...........and you can take that to the bank.

User avatar
JLAUDIO85
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 3:24 am
Car: 08 Black Altima Coupe 2.5SL CVT.
Location: Toronto

Post


User avatar
adidas2go
Posts: 4495
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:49 am
Car: Cycle through all kinds of cars, trucks, motorcycles, and boats 🤙
Once upon a time: 1st turbo Altima Coupe
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post

mcheddadi wrote:
ahem! A/C CVT is faster than 6.3sec, don't down your own coupe!

2008 Nissan Altima 3.5SE CoupeTRANSMISSION: continuously variable transmission

Zero to 60 mph: 5.8 secZero to 100 mph: 15.7 secStanding ¼-mile: 14.6 sec @ 97 mph

http://www.caranddriver.com/sh....html
ahem! operantly you didn't notice he said CVT like 4 times now. Those numbers are for the 6 speed. You are forgiven

User avatar
adidas2go
Posts: 4495
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:49 am
Car: Cycle through all kinds of cars, trucks, motorcycles, and boats 🤙
Once upon a time: 1st turbo Altima Coupe
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post

I really don't think it would be the blow out people say it would be. Look at the numbers. Plus is the RSX has mods that could throw 25 more hp his way... It would be close

Acura RSX Type S

Horsepower : 200 hp @ 7400 rpm('02-'04), 210 hp @ 7800 rpm('05+)Torque : 142 lb-ft @ 6000 rpm('02-'04), 143 lb-ft @ 7000 rpm('05+)Redline : 7900-8100 rpm

Top speed : 145 mph0-60 mph : 6.7 sec.('02-'04), 6.5 sec.('05)0-¼ mile : 15.2 sec @ 92.7 mph('02-'04)60-0 braking distance : 135 ft200 ft skidpad : 0.86 g

Curb Weight : 2769-2840 lbs

Altima Coupe 3.5 CVT

Horsepower : 270 hp @ 6000 rpmTorque : 258 lb-ft tq@ 4400 rpmRedline : 5800-6000 rpm

Top speed : 130-140 mph0-60 mph : 6.4 sec0-¼ mile : 14.8 sec @ 96.9 mph60-0 braking distance : 127ft200 ft skidpad : 0.81 g

Curb Weight : 3290 lbs


User avatar
mcheddadi
Posts: 6666
Joined: Thu May 17, 2007 2:24 pm
Car: R8

Post

adidas2go wrote:
ahem! operantly you didn't notice he said CVT like 4 times now. Those numbers are for the 6 speed. You are forgiven
LOL! those numbers ARE for the CVT! it's like in written in BOLD"TRANSMISSION: continuously variable transmission (<=CVT)"

YOU are forgiven
mcheddadi wrote:
ahem! A/C CVT is faster than 6.3sec, don't down your own coupe!

2008 Nissan Altima 3.5SE CoupeTRANSMISSION: continuously variable transmission <=CVT

Zero to 60 mph: 5.8 secZero to 100 mph: 15.7 secStanding ¼-mile: 14.6 sec @ 97 mph

http://www.caranddriver.com/sh....html
for the 6MT it's like even faster!:

2008 Nissan Altima 3.5SE CoupeTRANSMISSION: 6 Speed manual transmission

Zero to 60 mph: 5.7 secZero to 100 mph: 13.9 secStanding ¼-mile: 14.2 sec @ 101.2 mph

http://www.roadandtrack.com/as...t.pdf

User avatar
adidas2go
Posts: 4495
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:49 am
Car: Cycle through all kinds of cars, trucks, motorcycles, and boats 🤙
Once upon a time: 1st turbo Altima Coupe
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post

holy **** my bad.

Edmunds got 6.4 for the 0-60

http://www.edmunds.com/insidel...23955

nismofool
Posts: 455
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 1:50 pm
Car: Nissan Altima Coupe '08 3.5SE
Location: fontana,ca

Post

this might sound like a dumb question, because it probably is. Why is there a pretty huge gap between road and tracks 5.8 cvt, and edmunds 6.4 cvt.

i mean i'd understand if they were within a .1 - .3 difference, but a .6? almost half a second boggles me.

User avatar
adidas2go
Posts: 4495
Joined: Thu Oct 18, 2007 9:49 am
Car: Cycle through all kinds of cars, trucks, motorcycles, and boats 🤙
Once upon a time: 1st turbo Altima Coupe
Location: Raleigh, NC

Post

I'd trust car and driver over edmunds any day. I couldn't find that c&d altima coupe story so i just quoted edmunds.

User avatar
JLAUDIO85
Posts: 863
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 3:24 am
Car: 08 Black Altima Coupe 2.5SL CVT.
Location: Toronto

Post

please go to a track and record the race and tell us how u smoked rsxi dont care what others say..3.5VQ engine will eat type-s

User avatar
Hussain
Posts: 3162
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 10:54 pm
Car: 08 Altima Coupe 3.5se CVT

Post

ya the 3.5se would totally kill it.... although the only RSX i raced beat me lol had it in manual mode with RPMs up trying to get the guy to race for hella long and nothing, put it back in D and the RPMs drop and outta no where he down shifts and takes off hella quick... i was like WTF?!!! totally unfair race. but the car i really want to race and think it would be a close race is a S2000. the S2000 might win or i might win (depending on the driver) but i think it would be a very good race.


Return to “Altima General Discussions”