Post by
Q45tech »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/q45tech-u112.html
Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:56 am
The oem U91 front pads have more metal [thus a higher fade point] than the U93 both are very very quiet......there is probably another even quieter pad for 94-96......forgot the U number. Wish I could find the old U90 pad compound.........dustier but more initial bite.
Since the brake are the same 90-96 you can use any pad [correcting for worn sensor].
The U85 rear pad is the only one available so the friction vs. temp graph of the various front pads must be close or they would need more rear pad options.
The bean counters don't usually over ride the brake pad engineers after a design is in place.........[before production sure but not after].
Anyway at the manufacturers level brake pads [composition] from best to worst don't vary in cost by 50 cents.
How a $80 retail pad set that cost dealers $40, that cost Nissan $10 [in Japan] in mass quanties is an interesting lesson in economics.........the sensor and wire and connector is the most expensive part.
Making $30 on a replacement set is necessary to pay for the $1,000,000 engineering load of the initial testing/design of the pad compounds and brake system.......50,000 set of replacement pads x $30= $1.5 million.
Brake pads, oil filter, air filters, fuel filters, belts, thermostats, hoses are the only Nissan components likely to be used in replacement at least once on every car sold.