Ace2cool wrote:
And guess what? Firefighters, policemen, even preachers, get discounts along with the military. All kinds of restaurants and businesses offer a civil service discount alongside their military discount. Guess what? That's lost money. They're not paying full price.
And the reason this is such a big deal is that they are REQUIRED to go to that country to perform their job. They are REQUIRED to have all their gear, which often times, will end up as being MORE than 4 bags. They can get NJP and put on report if they don't have all their gear. They were allotted 4 bags in their orders, but Delta told them they could only have 3, and charged them a ridiculous baggage fee for the extra bag.
I'm disregarding your propaganda statement, as you calling the government out on propaganda is downright propaganda in itself. Your statement regarding that holds no weight IMHO. But as far as "overweight," news flash, you make money while on deployment. You buy things when you live somewhere for 2 years. You accumulate random goods. I used to be able to fit everything I owned in my Sea Bag and a suitcase, but now, I have to make 3 trips in my 2+2 in order to move everything I have. People buy things on a 2 year long deployment. That's just common sense.
And you must underestimate how big the "patriot effect" is in this country. If Delta had let this go unanswered, some people would downright refuse to fly with them. That's MILLIONS in losses, as opposed to the $2800 baggage fees that weren't supposed to be charged anyways. Simple US economics. They are doing what any large public business would do and SHOULD do.
I don't think so, that a "boycott" will occur if Delta do nothing in favor of the soldiers, you must be dreaming, watching too many movies, or perhaps making things looking extremely perfect. Look, deals are made, and several investors of Delta are not even Americans, they just won't care...Delta will be paid to the last cent after this incident...with your tax money...
Lets go to the root of this patriotic events...a country that invades another country has no other purpose but to subject, conquer and take advantage of the invaded...this is found since the beginning of human culture...and only big empires were successful invading smaller countries to posses their goods...today, you and I enjoy three four, or more cars in our garages, food from everywhere in the market, gasoline less than $5.00 a gallon...while in the rest of the world the price per gallon is %7.00 and above...why? because empires take it all... Do you think that there is a fight "for freedom"?...that the US government is looking for the liberation of other countries? ...ha, ha, ha... look, no government in this world, neither in the past, not today and less in the future will "help" another country for free...get it?
Lets go to recent history so you will see the parallel...
In Germany when Hitler was in power, the Germans used to support their troops because they were fighting for their country...they also have emblems and similar to stimulate the symphaty for their "soldiers' sacrifice"... This "trick" of "support our troops" was invented by some ancient culture, but Hitler originated the emblems, like the emblems used today by many in their car's bumper...
So, what we see today in US is not new but a copy of the tactics made by the German government...lets see another one...you saw the US army delivering pamphlets from airplanes to the Iraqui cities to desist any resistance, and guess what...this idea was also originated by the Germans, yes, Hitler again...
But, ignorance is also found everywhere, and there is an international article about wars, that it says that no soldier of a first country is obligated to fight against another (second) country if the other country has not attacked/invaded/threatened the first one.
This article came out after the WWII when several German soldiers and officers were under investigation for charges as abuses and crimes against humanity, but they were found "not guilty" because as soldiers they were just "obeying orders", and even when they knew that they were invading other countries without provocation, they had to obey and attack and kill soldiers and civilians...because those were the orders...
So, in front of this contradictory situation, because they -as army men- must obey orders of their superiors, and can't disobey them without court martial, the article was approved to avoid a similar scenario like WWII.
In other words, as Iraq was never a real enemy of US, that never attacked US, never invaded US, was never a threat for US, the US soldiers could easily avoided going to war against a country that wasn't an enemy by any means, and they were protected by international laws...of course, ignorance of these international agreements are never taught around the US military bases...
The same as well with Afghanistan, a country with sporadic tribes who wrere living so healthy -look at their teeth...no American dentist can imitate such a perfection in alignment with natural look- ...and now they will start to be victims of drinking sodas, watching Jay Leno and even been imposed to accept homosexuals living openly in their clans...come on! You are not liberating them...you are destroying them...
Thanks to these invasions, US is sucking the goods from everywhere, so, it is not your fault, not even mine, we are not the ones in power, but we surely enjoy the benefits of the invader... for this reason, I'm conscious that when I fill up my car's tank, that this gasoline is bloody oil, and that I enjoy cheaper gasoline than in other countries because innocent children, women, elder, etc in some country of the world have been murdered and pay the difference...
I respect your position, because the way you have been taught is different, but I prefer to review and ask questions, I prefer to analyze the both sides of the coin... of course that I will never do anything against the government, such should be stupid because you always lose, but at the same time I maintain the skepticism about their faked intentions when it is said that the invasions are made to "help" others...when is ourselves only...
So, "heroes" because you invade another country...well...that is your idea and definition of it...I just don't agree with that... I call heroes to the WWII veterans...about the rest... I think they should review the international laws before going to fight wars around...against countries that weren't a threat to US... this is my opinion.
Peace.