If you're going for ultra cheap then you're well on your way.anthony_S14 wrote:Finally going for it... Been wanting to do the SR swap but decided to try this route first. Already have the following related turbo parts installed:
Walbro Fuel pumpKoyo RadiatorNew timing chain kitDid compression test and Cylinders 1, 2, 4 are at 210 PSI and #3 at 215 PSI
Have the following parts sitting in my garage:
GT28RS Turbo (ebay special)Godspeed FMIC with piping for a KADE (ebay special)
Plan to buy the following:Enthalpy tune370 cc or more injectorsN62 MAFsome ebay brand bottom mount exhaust manifold like Megan or SSAutochrome
Am I off to a good start? I've read the KA-DET forum from the oldest post so I've done some research. Thanks for the help guys
Yeah, be like me and run a GT28RS with an .86 hotside.. I love 12 psi at 2200 RPM! It's awesome for daily driving. But if you want something a bit faster for the track, or drifting, get something bigger..WDRacing wrote:The disco potatoe is for a SR20. NOT a KA...it's to small.....
Or stay at 10 psi and be happy. The 240 is still very fun to drive at 10 psi. And you'll have zero lag.
WD
try some seafoamanthony_S14 wrote:bad carbon build up necessarily bad? Is there some sort of product I can use to clean that stuff up or is it strictly something that a machine shop would do? I used the craftsman compression tester that came with all sorts of hoses. I used the write up in the tech pages on "performing a compression test" it told me to let the engine complete over 7 turns but the instructions that came with the compression tester told me to keep cranking the engine until the pressure stops rising. Did I do something wrong?
I cut a lot out for the sake of saving space.Edub1 wrote:Excellent article!
Another question they typically ask is how much boost the KA can handle. I think this is a valid question for the following reason.
We all know that there is a difference between boost and horse power. This is normally attributed to larger turbos flowing more air. If we consider this dynamic, we will find that it is in the upper RPM range that the larger turbo's increased flow comes into play. More to the point, when the motor exceeds 5250RPMs and HP exceeds torque the bigger turbo is able to provide quality boost while the smaller one makes heat. I believe this is where the HP discrepancy comes from. In the lower RPM rages, where both turbos are efficiant, there should be no difference between the two.
Because the larger turbo will ultimatly make more HP at a lower boost, many with smaller turbos plan to run more boost to compensate. What this does, if my thinking is correct, is produce more low end strain on the engine parts and loses efficiancy (make heat rather than O2 mass) in the high RPM range. Obviously this is bad.............So, I propose that the bigger turbo can make a given HP more safely than a smaller one, and more HP with equal safety than a smaller turbo at the same level of boost.So, the answer to how much HP can my motor handle might sound something like " 325 - 350 with a T4 or 250 - 275 with a T3."
Good call. I made the same power at 8psi with my GT35 as my T3 Super 60 at 12-13psi.gr8bryt wrote:I was trolling through some archived content and ran across the statement about ka-t and boost vs max whp. I'm leaning toward a t3/t4 setup and running 10psi. Slightly larger turbo and less boost instead of smaller turbo w/ higher boost.
I cut a lot out for the sake of saving space.
anthony_S14 wrote:some ebay brand bottom mount exhaust manifold like Megan