SS Autochrome back w/a vengance...

Discuss topics related to the CA18DE and CA18DET series engines.
User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

They're baaaaaacccckkk.....

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors...02226

Still wish they were equal length, but for that starting price, you can't complain too much.


PacManVR4
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 6:34 pm

Post

Dont worry about that theres a Nice HKS ic on there too...lol

PacManVR4
Posts: 328
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2003 6:34 pm

Post

BTW floater we still on for our date next week lol

User avatar
Myetball
Posts: 299
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 6:46 pm

Post

Damn...beat me to it. Just got emailed that auction from ebay.

User avatar
Trigger
Posts: 550
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2003 6:13 am

Post

oh nice...top mount t3 coming soon they said :)

User avatar
iliketocrash
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 31, 2003 5:58 am

Post

I'll buy it!

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

gotta be better than stock! Hey Pac Man, I though we were keeping our "rendevous" on the DL?!?!? JK! Heheheh

User avatar
Dori Dori
Posts: 2250
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 4:46 am
Car: Cars of course

Post

Except that they are notorious for breaking/cracking and ruining turbos in the SR world.

User avatar
Notchbackca
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 9:11 pm
Car: guess...

Post

not to mention thier CA design had no actuall thought put into it, they either need equal length or have 2 and 3 the same length and 1 and 4 the same length, but that design is atrocious

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

Hmmm, good to know. I don't like the design at all, but I didn't know the SR guys were having problems with them. I wouldn't buy one, just because if I'm going to get a turbo mani, I want it to be equal length.

User avatar
Dori Dori
Posts: 2250
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 4:46 am
Car: Cars of course

Post

All the cheap ebay manifolds tend to crack. Really, it seems like it's luck of the draw for how long they last though. Sometimes they take a while to crack, other times not. The bad thing isn't that you lost x dollars on a manifold...you could just get another cheap-o. What's bad is when people's turbos get ruined from metal peices flying into the turbo!

User avatar
Notchbackca
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 9:11 pm
Car: guess...

Post

the real problem is its made from stainless, you want a mild steel manifold. if the metal is softer it can withstand the strain from tempurature changes better

from a metalurgy point of view... the harder a metal is the more brittle it is

NeedCAforS13
Posts: 4340
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 3:58 pm
Car: CA swapped S13 coupe
Location: Spartanburg SC
Contact:

Post

pauls ssautochrome SR manifold recently broke completly off... big chunks of it fell off, but luckily somehow avoided destroying that bada$$ gt25r :eek: I think I'll stick with the stock mani for now:)

Sean

Yellow4g63
Posts: 3718
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 6:07 pm
Car: 95 Nissan RB20 240SX RB20
91 Nissan NX2000 VE power
95 Nissan 240SX Stock
Contact:

Post

Notchbackca wrote:the real problem is its made from stainless, you want a mild steel manifold. if the metal is softer it can withstand the strain from tempurature changes better

from a metalurgy point of view... the harder a metal is the more brittle it is


Nope it's not that it's made out of Stainless steel why it cracks. if it were made out of mild steel it would still crack. The Matiral is just too think to support the weight of the turbo while on the car. Thicker gauge matiral and it will last longer stainless or Mild. Stainless has better heat properties than Mild steel.

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

And I'm officially out of your leauge now...

User avatar
Myetball
Posts: 299
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 6:46 pm

Post

Matiral=MaterialMild=Milled (Mild is like un-spicey hot sauce)

My Brazilian turbo motor has a bracket that connects the turbo to the block. If SSA headers crack from hanging all that weight maybe fabricating a bracket to hold the turbo up would extend the life of the manifold.

Yellow4g63
Posts: 3718
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 6:07 pm
Car: 95 Nissan RB20 240SX RB20
91 Nissan NX2000 VE power
95 Nissan 240SX Stock
Contact:

Post

Myetball wrote:Matiral=MaterialMild=Milled (Mild is like un-spicey hot sauce)

My Brazilian turbo motor has a bracket that connects the turbo to the block. If SSA headers crack from hanging all that weight maybe fabricating a bracket to hold the turbo up would extend the life of the manifold.


The manifold has to expand and contract when it heats up and cools down. A bracket will not help. The "Material" is just too thin. Hey it's cheap so even if it dose crack you can buy another one till that one cracks.

User avatar
CA19DET
Posts: 992
Joined: Thu May 15, 2003 9:30 am

Post

they already have a bracket for the SR guys to hold the weight, it bolts to the head,, and they still crack... the tend to crack at the collector, i think the welkds are just poooo, and they strart a crack there, and the heat is like a plasma torch and cuts the SS like butter..

User avatar
Dori Dori
Posts: 2250
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 4:46 am
Car: Cars of course

Post

It's hard in general to build a strong SS tubular manifold for a I4 that won't crack...that's why the good ones are usually very expensive. I4's are very unbalanced motors and vibrate a lot, which causes excess stress on the manifold. The CA has an advantage over the SR though being that it has lower displacement...the lower the displacement, the less vibration, so maybe it'll last longer on a CA. Either way, I'd say stick to your cast iron manifolds and spend the $300 (or however much they end up costing) on some other worthwhile mods.

nab911
Posts: 2438
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 9:33 am
Car: 93 Nissan 240SX SE

Post

The problem with just getting the mani again after it cracks caus its cheap is... do you really wanna replace a manifold every couple of months??

Nathan
Posts: 5629
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 6:43 am

Post

Yellow4g63 wrote:Nope it's not that it's made out of Stainless steel why it cracks. if it were made out of mild steel it would still crack. Stainless has better heat properties than Mild steel.


Care to substantiate this? EVERYTHING I know about exhaust manifolds, systems, and steel in general says that mild steel expands less from heat and takes cycling better. Believe it or not, heat cycles can actually make stainless more prone to corrosion. Of course mild steel transfers more heat than stainless, but it also deals with it a bit better. It is my opinion that a well designed manifold made of the right kind of either mild OR stainless steel can be made that wont crack. The problem is that then you end up paying 1200 bucks for a stainless one if thats what you want ;) You absolutely have to use thicker gauge tubing if you dont want cracking problems, especially with stainless.

User avatar
Dori Dori
Posts: 2250
Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2002 4:46 am
Car: Cars of course

Post

nab911 wrote:The problem with just getting the mani again after it cracks caus its cheap is... do you really wanna replace a manifold every couple of months??


Not only that but the broken manifold peices can damage your turbo...this could really mess your day if you're running an expensive turbo.

User avatar
Myetball
Posts: 299
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 6:46 pm

Post

Considering the SSAC manifolds have a reputation of cracking, I wouldn't waste my money. I for one don't have $300-400 to thow down the toilet. More like $700-1,000 if a cracked manifold tears up a turbo. Better to get one made by dee's fabricator and pay more. This sounds like one of those cases where you get what you pay for.

Yellow4g63
Posts: 3718
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 6:07 pm
Car: 95 Nissan RB20 240SX RB20
91 Nissan NX2000 VE power
95 Nissan 240SX Stock
Contact:

Post

Nathan wrote:Care to substantiate this? EVERYTHING I know about exhaust manifolds, systems, and steel in general says that mild steel expands less from heat and takes cycling better. Believe it or not, heat cycles can actually make stainless more prone to corrosion. Of course mild steel transfers more heat than stainless, but it also deals with it a bit better. It is my opinion that a well designed manifold made of the right kind of either mild OR stainless steel can be made that wont crack. The problem is that then you end up paying 1200 bucks for a stainless one if thats what you want ;) You absolutely have to use thicker gauge tubing if you dont want cracking problems, especially with stainless.


I'll try. It goes something like this. Stainless steel has a higher nickel content than mild steel. The Higher the nickel the stronger and more heat it can take.

Nathan
Posts: 5629
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2003 6:43 am

Post

Yeah, but the issue isn't so much a maximum heat issue...you'll melt the aluminum of the head and the pistons long before you'll significantly weaken the mild OR stainless steel. I'm more concerned by how the metals take heat cycling and how they deal with thermal expansion. My understanding is that stainless expands the most and also, the cycling is one of the contributors to cracked manifolds. All I'm really saying is that the SS autochrome mani's are awful thin and something made out of 8 ga. or schedule 40 thickness metal (stainless OR mild) will most likely last a very long time in comparison and might very well be worth it. Not trying to start an argument here ;)

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

Sweet pete, I started a quaint little war here! Keep the info coming guys, just keep it nice info. I don't like deleteing/editing posts...

Yellow4g63
Posts: 3718
Joined: Mon Jan 20, 2003 6:07 pm
Car: 95 Nissan RB20 240SX RB20
91 Nissan NX2000 VE power
95 Nissan 240SX Stock
Contact:

Post

Nathan wrote:Yeah, but the issue isn't so much a maximum heat issue...you'll melt the aluminum of the head and the pistons long before you'll significantly weaken the mild OR stainless steel. I'm more concerned by how the metals take heat cycling and how they deal with thermal expansion. My understanding is that stainless expands the most and also, the cycling is one of the contributors to cracked manifolds. All I'm really saying is that the SS autochrome mani's are awful thin and something made out of 8 ga. or schedule 40 thickness metal (stainless OR mild) will most likely last a very long time in comparison and might very well be worth it. Not trying to start an argument here ;)


I know just giving an explanition for other people to understand. I ask my friend all the time about the stainless vs mild. I take his word for it cause of the experince he has.

quest
Posts: 184
Joined: Sun May 25, 2003 1:37 am

Post

well, something took out movingviolations' turbo... saw him asking for a new turbo on freshalloy to replace the damaged gt25.

around here we make headers from sch40 els, mig or stick welded and don't have any kinda issues with 'em. I always add a brace to support the wt, and a flex to isolate exhaust system vibration. I'm sure it help the head/mani studs too. Pair cyls 1/4 & 2/3 and keep runners short and bends to a min

NeedCAforS13
Posts: 4340
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2003 3:58 pm
Car: CA swapped S13 coupe
Location: Spartanburg SC
Contact:

Post

yeah, he told me at the meet its not spooling properly now. that sucks:(

Sean

User avatar
Notchbackca
Posts: 264
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2004 9:11 pm
Car: guess...

Post

yellow 4g... strength of a metal has nothing to do with how it can handle heat cylcing, and that post shows about no understanding whatso ever of metalurgy or physics by your friend

tensil strength has never been and never will be the issue, a mild steel manifold can support your turbo just fine, if it was the issue everyone would be running around with tungsten manifolds, but that would most likely crack in 15 minutes, because tungsten may have the highest tensil strength of any metal but its also the most brittle metal

its just not cut and dry stronger is better, if your are building a frame that supports weight and never changes temp thats one thing, but being able to expand and contract without cracking is a WAY different ball game


Return to “CA18DE / CA18DET Forum”