BinaryVertigo wrote:okay what's up with this...people with stock twin turbo are doin single turbo conversion while others are doing twin turbo conversions? wtf? can any1 explain why the difference in preference? thanks
I'm going to cover this from my RX-7 background (stock sequential twins).
There's singles, parallel twins, and sequential twins.
Single Turbo:Pro: Huge potential, no flow restrictions, simple plumbingCons: LAG - the bigger the turbo, the bigger the lag is a good rule
Parallel Twins (usually implemented on V6 or V8 applications):Pro: Faster spool than single (each exhaust bank spools on turbo, such as on the 300ZXTT) so more responsive, plumbing is still simpler than sequential twins, but doubly complex as the single (there's two, dork).Cons: Some restriction on ultimate flow potential due to receiving only 1/2 of exhaust flow, lag, but less than a single
Sequential Twins (implemented for driveability, only Supra and FD stock):Pro: Fastest spoolup, best driveability. Example is the FD: first turbo spools at 2,000 rpm, second at 4,500, so you're always in at least some boost. Very easy to drive around town and in traffic, no sudden bursts of power, powerband is VERY smooth.Cons: Extremely complicated plumbing (the FD utilizes over 120 vacuum hoses for sequential operation), lowest power potential (most restrictive setup), expensive.
Think of it this way. You're using exhaust gas to spin a turbo, right? And a turbo is basically two fans connected by a shaft, right?
So the more exhaust gas you throw at it, the faster it'll spool. But on the other hand, the bigger the fan, the more it takes to spool it. In a fictional world, let's say you get enough exhaust out of that SR20 to spool a T04 at 3000rpm. Take that T04 off, replace it with a T88, and it'll spool at 5500rpm, right?
Ok, so now we've established turbo sizes. What happens when we throw twins in the mix?
Well, you can make the same power as a big turbo using two midsize turbos, or the same power as a midsize turbo using two small turbos (say, instead of a TD04e, using a pair of T25s or T28s). Why? The actual flow displacement of the two smaller turbos is EQUAL to the flow displacement (measured in CFM) of the larger turbo.
How does it work?
Now it depends on the layout. There's two kinds; parallel, and sequential. They are, in fact, exactly what they sound like. With parallel twins, the turbos run SIDE BY SIDE, and with sequentials, they run IN A ROW.
The best text illustration I can come up with is {oh, ph33r my 373313 sk177z y0

} (Ex = Exhaust source, TU = Turbo, IM = Intake Manifold)
Parallel:
Ex -> Tu \___ IMEx -> Tu /
Sequentials:
Ex -> Tu -> Tu -> IM
So you can see the advantages of the sequentials right there; the first turbo receives the FULL exhaust flow to spool it faster, while the parallel turbos are getting half the flow each. And the first turbo assists the second in spooling in the sequential operation! The disadvantages? In a sequential operation, you can see that the first turbo would impede ultimate flow potential to the second (rather than having it's own path of exhaust, it has to share), and that the second turbo impedes the compressed air coming from the first. There are also the associate heat problems (adbiatic efficiency) associated with two compressor wheels churning the same air and heating it up. As we all know, hot air is less dense than cold air.
So ultimately, the best setup for a street or roadcourse driven car is either a very well matched single or parallel twins. Only a street only car will benefit from sequentials in the long run, assuming that ungodly amounts of power are the goal.
Hope this helps!
EDIT: Just saw that someone mentioned cost. For a good comparison, a single turbo kit for an FD runs around $4500 - 5000 with FMIC. An upgraded twin set costs $3400 for just turbos. A full kit would probably cost around $8,000+.
EDIT 2: Also, don't forget with twins that you're pushing alot through the same manifold, and the manifold often becomes the greatest restriction involved.