Post by
masticatingcow »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/masticatingcow-u11112.html
Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:51 am
KA vs SR Threads
This has been hashed out OVER and OVER with no one coming out on top. Neither is better than the other.
Also, by setting up the KA as the binary opposite of the SR (which is bullcrap, BTW) you immediately exclude the RB and CA, which are, IMHO, superior turbo engines anyway.
The NA vs FI argument is also ridiculous because the goals of either build are COMPLETELY DIFFERENT. NA builds are rarely designed to compete with turbos in drag, unless the NA engine has huge displacement and wild cams. Therefore, small-displacement NA engines are not fit for drag racing, where power is such a huge factor. In autocross, on the other hand, you'd be stupid to show up with a FI dyno queen. The lag on the turbo would KILL you. In drift, power is less important, and a smooth, predictable power delivery is key. Again, drag engines need not apply.
So if we're going to argue KA-T vs SR, let's affix "for drag racing" or "for drift" or "for auto-x". Not only will the discussion be more MEANINGFUL, but it'll be shorter too.