this is true assuming you are easy on it. if you are rough it will shorten the life expectancy. for that matter downshifting is rough on the trans anyway. its fun to do from time to time but i would not get too carried away.RMiller wrote:They last a long time. I would never consider double-clutching for the sake of prolonging the life of my synchros. My two transmissions both worked perfect at 70k and 153k miles. You'll probably have other items wear out before you need a new trans anyway.
chickentendah wrote:Thanks for the replies guys. Another question for you hardcore gearheads while we're on topic:
Does a rev-matched-single-clutch-downshift wear the synchros just as much as a normal rev-matched upshift?
that doesn't answer my question. and i already knew that double clutching isn't necessary for modern trannys. i took the F&F comment as an offense btw. i was asking a legitimate technical question to those who are more knowledgeable then me on the internals of a modern transmission. thanks for the reply, but no thanks for the attitude.ibzbro wrote:this is the one and only time you need to double clutch. YOU DRIVE A CAR THAT HAS A DOGGEAR transmission. so basicly if you drive a 1960 jaguar you need to double clutch, other then that you don't need to, end of story. i don't care what you hear on the fast and the furious. you do not need to worry about wearing out your synchros, you will never drive your car that hard for that long. i would worry more about your transmission in genearl.
if im ever in any performance situation raising the rpm at the end of a gear is not a very good idea..so you say at say 6300(redline for the ka) you clutch the transmission, disengage the shifter, release the clutch and then raise the rpm...to what extent do you raise the rpm. rev-limiter usually hits about 6500 or is it that you let the rev's drop so far that you have to blip the gas on the second clutching so that the engine and transmission match.....im still completely befuddled by this whole concept...it makes as much sense to me as a football bat. i dont mean to flame or anything like that i just wanna understand why anyone would ever want to clutch the transmission twice.ibzbro wrote:asumming you are going from 1st to 2nd.push clutch in take out of gearlet out clutchraise rpmrev matchpush clutch input it in to secondlet clutch out
Double clutching is actually for straight line down shifting when at a lower RPM. Try cruising at 60mph in 5th gear, and you want to throw it into third. Rather then throwing it into 3rd the normal way and letting the car nose dive then go, you can double clutch by pressing in the clutch and throwing the gear shifter into neutral, then depress the clutch. Immediately after you depress the clutch in neutral, give a quick blip to the throttle, push in the clutch, throw it in third, let go of the clutch, and nail the gas. Try it and you will understand.sdwyzs14 wrote:
if im ever in any performance situation raising the rpm at the end of a gear is not a very good idea..so you say at say 6300(redline for the ka) you clutch the transmission, disengage the shifter, release the clutch and then raise the rpm...to what extent do you raise the rpm. rev-limiter usually hits about 6500 or is it that you let the rev's drop so far that you have to blip the gas on the second clutching so that the engine and transmission match.....im still completely befuddled by this whole concept...it makes as much sense to me as a football bat. i dont mean to flame or anything like that i just wanna understand why anyone would ever want to clutch the transmission twice.