smockers83 wrote:It's the way Sprint programs their phones that makes their phones suck. In my personal opinion, Sprint just sucks everywhere. Every single person I've known with Sprint has griped about them about very valid issues.
The best company that used to be out there was Alltel. I had them for years, never had one issue. Never. Coverage everywhere, no dropped calls. Now that I have AT&T with my iPhone, I have some sketchy service...nowhere near the quality of Alletl, but the phone makes up for it. What gets me is that AT&T gets all this money as the exclusive carrier of the iPhone, yet their networks are overloaded and service isn't great. Where's all that money going?
The whole bit between Verizon and AT&T is valid by both parties. Verizon has much greater 3G coverage by geographic size while AT&T focuses more on population centers. However, people travel out of population centers. So, both are right.
I've only called into Sprint twice in 10 years about billing errors. Can't say the same about AT&T. I also have very little reception issue. The only two areas that I lose reception are in the subterranean parking garage where we live (2 floors of concrete and plumbing can do that to a wireless signal) and a local toll road that seems to be uncovered by just about all of the cell providers (definitely Sprint & AT&T).
As for the money, I recently read an article comparing AT&T's income increase since the Iphone and their money on investing in technology. It showed that they actually started cutting spending once the Iphone was released.
hyperm3 wrote:
Yeah, but at least you wouldn't be complaining about not getting service(or services from circa 1990's).
I have those services, I just don't like how they're implemented. Helio (now owned by Virgin Mobile) had a very robust MMS package. Picture, video, and voice messages were sent directly to the recipient's phone. They unfortunately, had a laundry list of other problems, that made me return th phones (including Indian tier 1 support who couldn't speak english).
zozoka1212 wrote:
Nate,
Why not just use the phone what it is for call? Do you need sprint tv, navigation, unlimited this and that? Especially if it sucks and you are low on money. Why would you support something you don't like? If you give them your money they don't care. My work cell from my company blackberry is just for email when I am not in the office and call. As soon as I leave the company I turn it off till next day I go in.
Just get what you really need and you can actually use it. You save money and will be less disaponted. Cancell those features and save money and the meantime you stop supporting Sprint.
Zozo,
I'm not complaining about the $117/mo I spend on my cell phones. I'm complaining about MMS and how they down sample picture mail when you click "download to my computer", yet the display image is at full quality.
I use my cell phone A LOT. When I'm bored, I'll start looking up cooking recipes, science articles, sustainable technology, ebay items...etc. I also, really love text messaging because it doesn't require large amounts of time investment. I can have a conversation that would take 1 hour of exclusive time on the phone via text and only invest a total of 10 mins.
The other features like TV and Navigation (which suck) are required for my phone and my wife's phone. Just like the Iphone or Blackberry require their own plans, my HTC and my wife's Samsung are designed to take advantage of the entire Sprint service and they force you to use this plan.
I've already tried stripping down the plan and just adding on the text messaging and internet, but the Sprint system won't allow it.