Spool time on this.....

Information on the naturally-aspirated KA24E and KA24DE engines.
SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

A Garrett with a .70 A/R turbine side, and a .82 A/R compressor side on a basically stock (unless I do some porting before) KA24E. What RPM do you think this would spool up at? I searched and didn't find my answer. Or should I just save this turbo for a built motor? Thanks- Brandon


IvoryJ30t
Posts: 3076
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 1:36 pm
Car: 95 Maxima GLE, 95 Maxima GXE

Post

well thats the ar spec, now whats the actual size of the turbo.

IvoryJ30t
Posts: 3076
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 1:36 pm
Car: 95 Maxima GLE, 95 Maxima GXE

Post

a/r is the size of the nozzle, not the turbine or compressor.

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

Sorry, it's a T3, and .70 A/R is on the turbo housing itself, and .82 is on the exhaust side.

IvoryJ30t
Posts: 3076
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2003 1:36 pm
Car: 95 Maxima GLE, 95 Maxima GXE

Post

t3 compressor and turbine

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

Umm...I'd think it's all T3, it's a stock turbo for something (some kind of truck) that came from Garrett and has never been on anything with downpipe. It's decent sized turbo.

rco8786
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 4:36 am

Post

My semi-uneducated guess is somewhere around 2700-2900 depending on other factors. the t3 isnt huge to begin w/ so it shouldn't be bad.

j-z
Posts: 2878
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 4:26 pm
Car: 95 240sx

Post

thats gonna take a while buddy. remember all those diesel trucks have twice the amount of cylinders as we do. you also have to take into consideration of your rev limit. which is about 6.5-7k. you probably wouldnt even read boost on that thing close to 4k maybe 3.5k if youre lucky. i dont know exactly but thats my guess. in other words it wont be very fun at all to drive. youre gonna have MAJOR lag and not that much air being forced into your motor with a straight t3 as you say. just save and get a turbo thats properly sized for your motor. dont get one thats was properly sized for some big *** diesel truck.

rco8786
Posts: 277
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 4:36 am

Post

j-z wrote:thats gonna take a while buddy. remember all those diesel trucks have twice the amount of cylinders as we do. you also have to take into consideration of your rev limit. which is about 6.5-7k. you probably wouldnt even read boost on that thing close to 4k maybe 3.5k if youre lucky. i dont know exactly but thats my guess. in other words it wont be very fun at all to drive. youre gonna have MAJOR lag and not that much air being forced into your motor with a straight t3 as you say. just save and get a turbo thats properly sized for your motor. dont get one thats was properly sized for some big *** diesel truck.


:rolleyes Somebody's never seen a T3 before...

j-z
Posts: 2878
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 4:26 pm
Car: 95 240sx

Post

nope i guess not. oh wait what was that thing on my prelude? yeah it was a t3. hes gonna have major lag with that thing. not even worth putting on a ka. how can you assume i have never seen a t3 before? doesnt make sense.

MikeMurphy
Posts: 824
Joined: Sun Feb 23, 2003 12:20 pm
Car: Guess
Contact:

Post

Anyways...

With a 2.4L engine and that spec turbo mentioned above, I would take a guess and say full boost of maybe 8psi and it would probably diminish to around 5 or 6 psi between 5000 and 6500rpm. Boost of 8psi reached at around 3800rpm, maybe even sooner.

T3 is fairly small so you will have some considerable backpressure in the exhaust manifold. However what you do have working for you is a favorable A/R on both your turbine and compressor, for the size of the turbo.

Please consider the above a guess.

EDIT: I read the A/R ratios backwards. Not quite as good of a setup. Full boost at 4200rpm maybe. However it should hold boost a little better on the top end, but im thinking beyond the KA possibilities.

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

Ahh oh well, it was internal wg anyway. If it was a T4, spool time would drop what maybe 800rpm? Doesn't matter I guess.

j-z
Posts: 2878
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 4:26 pm
Car: 95 240sx

Post

no your spool time would increase if were talking about the same a/r. what are you going to use your car for? that would help you pick the proper size turbo for your needs.

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

No, I know. I meant the rpms would drop i.e. 3800 to 3000. I will mostly drag it, but every now and then road course, and very seldom auto x.

j-z
Posts: 2878
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 4:26 pm
Car: 95 240sx

Post

no, it would spool at a later time. ie; t3 housing spool at 3.5k and t4 housing at 4k. just using those numbers as an example. well for road course and auto-x you definately dont want any lag at all. for drag you can compensate a little lag for more top end. will it be a daily driver? for road course and autox i would suggest a .48 a/r and drag .63 a/r. for street driving i suggest a .48 a/r also. when i do get my 240 i will be using a .48 a/r with a 57 trim compressor t3/t4E. mainly because i dont like waiting for power and i want it to be a fun car to drive. so if you dont mind a little bit of lag and want more top end go with the .63 a/r. if you go with the .48 a/r you will still haul *** no doubt. you just wont have to wait. so pick one.

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

Yeah but will a .63 A/R push around 450hp? It might be a daily driver, but it doesn't have to be.

j-z
Posts: 2878
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 4:26 pm
Car: 95 240sx

Post

oh ok. youre going pretty big. yes ive seen .63 a/r housings up there.

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

j-z wrote:nope i guess not. oh wait what was that thing on my prelude? yeah it was a t3. hes gonna have major lag with that thing. not even worth putting on a ka. how can you assume i have never seen a t3 before? doesnt make sense.


Regardless, it's still a T3 turbine. The size of the turbine wheel will be the most significant factor in regards to spool. The A/R more or less will fine tune it. I've seen T3/T4's with a .63 A/R spool up by 2000-2500 RPM to 9 psi on KAs. Going to a .82 A/R is not going to kill the boost threshold to the tune of some 5000 RPM. I'd say it will hit 9 psi by 3000-3500 RPM at worst. That's not bad at all.

Hell, my T4 turbine can spool to 6.5 psi well before 4000 RPM.

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

So this may not be a bad turbo then? Eventually I'll upgrade valves, retainers, springs and all head work to up my rpm's. Then weld the internal wg shut and go ext. So should I put this turbo on? Damn I'm a confused little boy.

j-z
Posts: 2878
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 4:26 pm
Car: 95 240sx

Post

i seriously wouldnt. i would get one thats properly sized for your needs. you mentioned that it was a straight t3 right? why even bother?

User avatar
95_240sx
Posts: 958
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2002 7:24 pm
Car: My baby (car)
Contact:

Post

LOL. Who says turbo lag is a BAD thing? As long as you know whats coming, its cool with me. Wait until we see spool times on my T04X^2. :)

Rick

j-z
Posts: 2878
Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2003 4:26 pm
Car: 95 240sx

Post

i never did say lag was a BAD thing. just from experience of driving my car and other cars lag sux! and you can go too big on a turbo size. ive seen it happen and man is that not cool. you still have to get a turbo thats properly sized for your needs no matter what.

User avatar
C-Kwik
Moderator
Posts: 8070
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 9:28 pm
Car: 2013 Chevy Volt, 1991 Honda CRX DX

Post

Properly sized is relative. It depends on goals. A larger turbo may respond slower but so long as it is still within the range of the motor's airflow at the intended boost, the larger turbo will yield more power. Trust me when I say many will not care about lag when they feel what 450+ WHP feels like. The Z06 I smoked in my friend's Supra sure couldn't tell that I was lagging.

But even for those who don't like lag, consider that what you are describing is not a huge step. It's still using a T3 turbine. Stepping up to a T4 would make a more drastic difference in response. And even a mid-sized T4 would not be a terrible turbo on a KA.

Projex240
Posts: 926
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 9:52 pm
Car: Dogs , My RIDE

Post

Why would you guys see that thats a t3 turbo? I havent ever seen a t3 with those a/r's. Tha sounds like a straight t4 from a deisel. Not to mention a big t4. Desiel turbos that I can order all day long are about .82 or .84 with a t04b compressor, or a t04e compressor. The only thing that would lead me to believe that that was a t3 would be the compressor. Thats a common sized compressor for a t04s compressor. And those are usually mated with a t3 turbine. But oh well..its not my turbo..ill just take his word for it. The lag should be at full boost by around 3500-400o with a turbine housing that size. It would alsod depend on the wheel itself..though. hmmmmmm, thats a tough one.

User avatar
90lkn4swp
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2003 8:19 am
Car: putting rounds down range / and gettin back home so i can drive again

Post

C-Kwik wrote:I've seen T3/T4's with a .63 A/R spool up by 2000-2500 RPM to 9 psi on KAs.


C-Kwik would you mind sharing what stage wheel and also what size trim?

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

Yeah I doubt this is a T4 but I could be wrong I'm slightly new to the turbo game. I also thought those were big numbers for a factory T3 turbo. I dunno.

Red Lightning
Posts: 157
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 6:42 pm

Post

Was this tuIs this turbo from a diesel truck? Diesel turbos aren't that efficient, because the diesel engines only rev to 4000rpm.

BTW, anyone know how much HP a T3 from the early 300ZX can support?

SHIEF
Posts: 834
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2003 4:33 pm

Post

I have no idea what it's for. My friend got it from Garrett somehow and it's never been put on anything, it still has marks on the fins from the factory. So is there anything I can do to the turbo itself to help spool time besides porting and polishing the exhaust hook-up? Thanks- Brandon

User avatar
90lkn4swp
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2003 8:19 am
Car: putting rounds down range / and gettin back home so i can drive again

Post

i dont think there is anything you can do to the turbo itself to help spool it up at a lower rpm besides ceramic coating the turbine side but even then you might not see a very big change in response. you can mabye change the turbine wheel if you want to rebuild it. but then again i still dont have a full understanding of turbos so i cant offer you exact advice

Projex240
Posts: 926
Joined: Sat Jan 04, 2003 9:52 pm
Car: Dogs , My RIDE

Post

You won be able to "change the characotristics of the turbos sppol up unless you go into the turbo and have it rebuild with different specs. Too much money and time. If thats the case..just get another turbo. Also, deisel turbo are very efficeit, the only reason deiseil engines spin to 4k rpms is because the exhuast gases those HUGE engines spit out at 4000 rpms is enough to spool a turbo this size. Plus, the gearing on alot of deisel truck is so close, that they use up 20 gears to deisel trucks, so 4000 is all they need to get moving and a good pace.The turbo would be just fine for what you need, besides lag is only against you if yyou want to start a race at 1500 rpms or so..and since most folks start out at 3500-4000 rpms in a run, then lag isnt even a factorYou cant get rid of lag...but you can reduce the lag "time" if it takes you 3 seconds to build boost when going from 1500 to 4000, then theres room to improve. Use a lightweight fly, pulleys, a good 3 inch DP, 3 inch exhuast, test pipe, and if you want to, use a 1 peice 11lb driveshaft from enjukuracing.com. instead if 3 seconds, itll be more like 1-1.5.Thats about as good as it gets, bud.


Return to “KA24E / KA24DE Forum”