Specialty Engineering KA24E question...

General discussion forum about the 240sx, and a great place to introduce yourself to the board!
S13CoupeLover
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:31 pm
Car: 1990 240sx hatch

Post

What would this red thing where the alternator would go????



I dunno what it could be. any thoughts??


User avatar
lancet913
Posts: 225
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:54 am
Car: 1996 240sx se
KA24DET @12psi

Post

Dry sump oil system


S13CoupeLover
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:31 pm
Car: 1990 240sx hatch

Post

Oh wow... didn't think of that. Thank you.

User avatar
breadbox
Posts: 8549
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:09 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX
89 Koop
84 720 4x4KC
Location: Va Bch

Post

How many people on here run a dry sump?

Never really looked into it, but it seems like it'd be easier to maintain.


User avatar
breadbox
Posts: 8549
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:09 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX
89 Koop
84 720 4x4KC
Location: Va Bch

Post

Also what 240 or pickup is that?

User avatar
mattblancarte
Posts: 1978
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 4:14 pm
Car: 2005 BMW M3 Comp. Coupe

Post

breadbox wrote:How many people on here run a dry sump?
I'd say less than .1%. It's just too expensive and pointless for most people.

User avatar
breadbox
Posts: 8549
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:09 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX
89 Koop
84 720 4x4KC
Location: Va Bch

Post

I mean is it "better" for the motor than wet sump?

Is there any drawback other than price for dry sump?

I'd like to when I am building/learning to build motors install a dry sump and learn about setting them up. They have noow caught my interest.

S13CoupeLover
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:31 pm
Car: 1990 240sx hatch

Post

So wait... these cars truly only use 2 belts? water and a dry sump? no need for alt., correct? so wow... a lot less moving parts so a gain in response. and also they're water pump pulleys also seem larger... is that to get more water to flow throughout the engine and in doing so cooling it even more? dang... who would really think about doing this for a KAE?? I wonder what kind of A/F ratio they're running and also timing wow... the timing must be high.

no wonder these people putting out 250+ from a single cam. Also this is the same engine MOST (not all) would just throw away and just go for the DE, cuz they think it'll be a better gain. I say the KAE has more of a greater starting point than a DE.
breadbox wrote:Also what 240 or pickup is that?
It's a NASport GT3 240sx... or if i'm wrong it could be from their GT4 datsun 510. built by Specialty Engineering.

S13CoupeLover
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:31 pm
Car: 1990 240sx hatch

Post

breadbox wrote:I mean is it "better" for the motor than wet sump?

Is there any drawback other than price for dry sump?

I'd like to when I am building/learning to build motors install a dry sump and learn about setting them up. They have noow caught my interest.
my understanding of a dry sump is you have a oil tank out side the engine. and then you have 2 "motors" one to push the oil to the pistons, crank, etc etc and then another motor or pump to send the oil back. So this basically eliminates windage or excess oil putting extra unwanted force upon the crank, in doing so your basically freeing hp.

if this is wrong sorry please correct me. i dunno how to set it up or truly how it works. this is what i've read. this is not out of experience of using one. i would love to but hell... can't.
Modified by S13CoupeLover at 2:30 PM 10/28/2009

User avatar
breadbox
Posts: 8549
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 4:09 pm
Car: 89 Nissan 240SX
89 Koop
84 720 4x4KC
Location: Va Bch

Post

I want to go to there. So, If your understanding is correct...do want.

User avatar
StylesCD
Posts: 98
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:35 pm

Post

S13CoupeLover wrote:So wait... these cars truly only use 2 belts? water and a dry sump? no need for alt., correct?
you're going to need an alternator to power the car's battery anywho...

i cant think of an oil powered battery

User avatar
float_6969
Moderator
Posts: 17366
Joined: Mon Aug 26, 2002 1:55 pm
Car: CA18DET swapped 1995 Nissan 240sx (too many mods to list)
2015 SV Leaf w/QC & Bose (daily)
Location: Topeka, Kansas
Contact:

Post

Drag car? Doesn't need an alternator.

sommmatt
Posts: 2608
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 8:03 pm
Car: 1989 Nissan 240SX

Post

S13CoupeLover wrote:So wait... these cars truly only use 2 belts? water and a dry sump? no need for alt., correct? so wow... a lot less moving parts so a gain in response. and also they're water pump pulleys also seem larger... is that to get more water to flow throughout the engine and in doing so cooling it even more? dang... who would really think about doing this for a KAE?? I wonder what kind of A/F ratio they're running and also timing wow... the timing must be high.

no wonder these people putting out 250+ from a single cam. Also this is the same engine MOST (not all) would just throw away and just go for the DE, cuz they think it'll be a better gain. I say the KAE has more of a greater starting point than a DE.

It's a NASport GT3 240sx... or if i'm wrong it could be from their GT4 datsun 510. built by Specialty Engineering.
Well you're wrong. The difference is in head design. 4 valves move more air than 3. DOHC head flows better. (I have a built KA24E turbo so don't even go there)
float_6969 wrote:Drag car? Doesn't need an alternator.
This.

S13CoupeLover
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:31 pm
Car: 1990 240sx hatch

Post

sommmatt wrote:
Well you're wrong. The difference is in head design. 4 valves move more air than 3. DOHC head flows better. (I have a built KA24E turbo so don't even go there)
who ever said anything about head flow??? did i?? no... don't get all butt hurt. Sure you've turboed a E and that means what??? try making a KAE N/A to produce 200+ no wait isn't more like 270+?? or around there? I think that'll be the make or break point.

all i'm saying is there's better resources for the KAE than for the DE. How many years of aftermarket/race tuning engineering research went into making a 270+hp KAE?? i'd say a few years give or take.

of course you can slap on a turbo and be all i made 300hp with stock bottom end. try to make that with the same engine but N/A, i'd say a lot more thinking would have to go into it. i bet anything that those people who made those took chances on stuff that they thought might of worked but didn't.

SO bottom line: KAE N/A a whole lot of resources to make one IF you take the time out and just ASK the people who made them some questions to help. There's how many shops that made these engines? rebello racing, specialty engineering, ETC ETC. how many performance places made 270+hp DE?? truly maybe there have been a few, but i can't think of any.

also for me i'd take throttle response over raw turbo power. or possibly i would like to take the challenge of a N/A KAE build. also i think you'll be able to make more than these cars. they have intake restrictions and some other stuff that limit HP, so there's a possible way to get probably close to ~300hp. if there's a will there's a way!
float_6969 wrote:Drag car? Doesn't need an alternator.
not a drag car. SCCA GT3 track car. or NASport GT3 track car.not sure if NASport is a branch off of SCCA but i know they use some of their rulings and stuff.

User avatar
Dattebayo
Posts: 33288
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 10:04 am
Car: 2004 Nissan Frontier Desert Runner
Location: NE DC

Post

S13CoupeLover wrote:How many years of aftermarket/race tuning engineering research went into making a 270+hp KAE?? i'd say a few years give or take.
I hope you like a 3K RPM idle.

S13CoupeLover
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:31 pm
Car: 1990 240sx hatch

Post

Dattebayo wrote:
I hope you like a 3K RPM idle.
I'd say more in the range of 1.5-2k idle, but hey you have to take a hit somewhere right? You give some, you lose some.

User avatar
killernoodle
Posts: 206
Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:08 pm
Car: My daily: 2005 Cadillac CTS-V - pretty much stock
Brother's S13 project car: SR20det, wilwoods, suspension, q45 diff/axles, 315s out back
Location: Charlotte NC

Post

S13CoupeLover wrote:
also for me i'd take throttle response over raw turbo power..
Or how about response + raw power?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gvgJUChzksI

User avatar
Dattebayo
Posts: 33288
Joined: Sun Aug 25, 2002 10:04 am
Car: 2004 Nissan Frontier Desert Runner
Location: NE DC

Post

S13CoupeLover wrote:I'd say more in the range of 1.5-2k idle, but hey you have to take a hit somewhere right? You give some, you lose some.
No. It was a 3000 RPM idle.

S13CoupeLover
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:31 pm
Car: 1990 240sx hatch

Post

oh well i'm sorry. still... i'll take that hit for a nice 260+hp at 10k rpm. I would not mind.

User avatar
Koshin
Posts: 14088
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 4:43 pm
Car: JP'd out Y32 Nissan Gloria GTU
750 hp '87 Buick Grand National
'63 Chevy Impala SS 327/4 speed
Location: ...in your garage stealing your wheels
Contact:

Post


S13CoupeLover
Posts: 428
Joined: Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:31 pm
Car: 1990 240sx hatch

Post

eh people have there own opinions, i don't care.


Return to “240sx General Discussion”