Q45tech wrote:Stiffer valve springs wear the cams and followers and seats faster. The HLA design must be changed to adjust for higher spring pressure.
Q45 rpm limits are dictated by the stroke [piston speed] and the strength of materials of rod bolts and rods. Titanium rods, etc
no offence but that is just so generic. i was kinda hoping for some personal experience rather than a text book recital.
Of course they wear the cams more however a 20% increase in seat pressure to eliminate valve bounce and float in my case is hardly going to increase wear significantly
I've heard this all before. I didnt listen. I went the "terrible way" of regrind camshafts, thicker shims and uprated valve springs (on my other vehicle's engine) ... peak power rpm shifted from 6500 rpm to 9000 rpm!! max rpm shifted from 8000 to 10,000 rpm!! This was after the experts told me there was no gains to be had from valve springs. After nearly 2 years there is no sign of wear on the lobes or on the pre hardened shims. The cams were not hardened either. Just work hardened via 500 km's of easy driving. So you would think if any cams were going to wear it would have been these. no?
Now for the conrods ... correct me if i'm wrong but they are not forged so assumption of failure method would be bending. Given the size of them ... i cant see that happening.
Rod bolts ... i have wondered about these and you make a very good point there. I was thinking of matching up some arp bolts to suit but i cant see 7000 rpm being a problem given the excellent rod/stroke ratio and bore/stroke ratio
HLA design ... mind going into some more detail? i'm interested as to what will/could happen?