The SR T25 has a larger exhaust housing, so yes its an upgrade. The SRs also had BOVs, so their turbos are often in better shape the the CAs. If you're looking for options that are a step up, search on this board for the multiple GT25R vs. T3 discussions.02 Black Spec V wrote:you say your stock T25 is good for about 230HP and 15PSI? Is the SR T25 any different than the CA? Im sure the T25 spools up quicker so that would be a plus.
A/R = Area/Raduis ratio. It has to do with the area of the scroll of the turbo divided by the radius of the center section or some garbage. Anyway, the A/R is predetermined on both the turbine and compressor housings. When selecting an A/R, people (on here at least) are usually talking about the turbine housing. The smaller the A/R, the better low end response. The higher the A/R, the better the top end performance. The goal is to match the compressor with a good A/R turbine so you keep the turbo in it's efficiency range without stress. Keep in mind there is always a trade-off though. The smaller the A/R, the more top end you lose. The higher the A/R, the slower the spool.02 Black Spec V wrote:What is the A/R on a turbo? Can it be changed? Or is that how that turbo is stock? What would be the benifit to changing the A/R?
Remember Im still learning alot on turbos, so any help you have is better than what I got now....
I believe they are saying that the RB20 ECU is like the CA where both can be socketed and edited with the ROMedit software. Apparently the code is very similar as well which I wouldn't doubt as they are from the same production timeframe.2BN_S13 wrote:What do they mean by this on that site you gave us?
"Also, if you have an R32 Skyline (rb20det) than all the CA programming principles are the same, ie, no need for a daughterboard (like the sr20) etc.."
does that mean you can just put a IC cage right on the motherboard?
So how do you pick a good A/R for the CA? Im guessing that since the SR T25 is what alot of people go for the .80 is good because you get a wide power range.c-rad wrote:
A/R = Area/Raduis ratio. It has to do with the area of the scroll of the turbo divided by the radius of the center section or some garbage. Anyway, the A/R is predetermined on both the turbine and compressor housings. When selecting an A/R, people (on here at least) are usually talking about the turbine housing. The smaller the A/R, the better low end response. The higher the A/R, the better the top end performance. The goal is to match the compressor with a good A/R turbine so you keep the turbo in it's efficiency range without stress. Keep in mind there is always a trade-off though. The smaller the A/R, the more top end you lose. The higher the A/R, the slower the spool.
That's a reasonable approach; I'm tentatively planning on using an eManage to do the same thing.02 Black Spec V wrote:If I were to get say a Z32 MAF and 550's, plus I want the boost cut and speed limiter removed I need to socket my ECM and have someone make a chip. On top of that it would be a good idea to still get a SAFC and fine tune the fuel. Is what Im thinking correct? I really just need a base map for the new injectors and maf, but for tuning I could use the SAFC???
There is a formula they use that involves the displacement, volumetric effieciency, intended boost level, etc. From what I have been seeing on this board and elsewhere, a 0.64 A/R turbine housing is "probably" about as high as you would want to go. A 0.48 would give you great spool, but would most likely kill the performance on a lot of turbos like the gt25r and gt2871r where their effieciency is in the higher boost levels (15-20+ psi). I plan on running a 2871R (.64 A/R) @ 17-18 psi with a beefy headgasket, ARP head studs, 550s, Z32MAF, and base mapped EPROM. I think that with that setup it will be a nice little warrior.02 Black Spec V wrote:So how do you pick a good A/R for the CA? Im guessing that since the SR T25 is what alot of people go for the .80 is good because you get a wide power range.
Well, with the Z32 MAF, essentially your boost and fuel cut will be removed as it is highly unlikely you will outflow it. A SAFC would still be a great idea as it will allow you to fine tune it using a wideband O2. The base maps are just that...base maps. You will still want to lean it out if you are not maxing out your injectors, which you shouldn't be anyway....02 Black Spec V wrote:OK so after doing alot of searching a reading I have another question.
If I were to get say a Z32 MAF and 550's, plus I want the boost cut and speed limiter removed I need to socket my ECM and have someone make a chip. On top of that it would be a good idea to still get a SAFC and fine tune the fuel. Is what Im thinking correct? I really just need a base map for the new injectors and maf, but for tuning I could use the SAFC???
How do I socket the ECM? Ive been searching and havent found anything. And im not nerdy enough to make my own chips, Ill just spend alot of money and not know how to do it, so ill leave that up to someone else.
OK I talked to my parts dept today and we can get the Nismo CA motor mounts. It will be $270 for the set (both engine mounts and trans mount). If anyone is interested I can get you the info of the guy to talk to so you can get them.rico05 wrote:If you can get Nismo CA mounts, HOOK US UP.