Should have nudged him a few times - Heavier car, beefier bumpers (and probably the only one with insurance! )paranoidjack wrote:OF COURSE out of coincidence I was stuck behind him for 20 miles of slow traffic, all the while watching him enjoy his victory with various hand motions and signals.
in MA, you TOUCH the car in front of you, even if they agree they slammed their brakes on or whatnot, it is your fault. THAT is some BS.Skibane wrote:Should have nudged him a few times - Heavier car, beefier bumpers (and probably the only one with insurance! )
If it's not under 8, I would be checking the knock sensors.qship96 wrote:97-01 q cant accelerate 0-60 in 7.1 seconds stock,more like 8-8.5
I'm given you the recorded data from edmunds.com and cars.com But the fact still remains he shouldn't have lost, . No offense but maybe it was more so driver error than the car, or like Q45tech said his car like most other's aren't running in prestine condition. Just my .02qship96 wrote:97-01 q cant accelerate 0-60 in 7.1 seconds stock,more like 8-8.5
from the way his car lurched, I would assume manual.Solini wrote:Well that's the thing, was he up against a manual or a auto??
My friend has a 2000 GS400 with only about 35k miles on it. It is beautiful black/black, and off the line makes my Q whimper....at 80mph+ though, it is a different story.....Jesda wrote:525s are fairly slow cars. The '95 is a second and a half or more quicker than the '90 2.5 E34 manual I owned, but the later one doesnt -feel- much faster.
Weight difference is pretty noticeable, making off the line harder for the Q. Of course, Lexus and Cadillac manage to take off pretty gosh darn quickly, thanks in part to better traction and gearing.
That car really moves. I raced someone with 1999 GS400, and he left me in the dust. He also raced a friend of mine who has an automatic 1998 540i and beat him too. Bear in mind, the driver has a lot to do with it.paranoidjack wrote:My friend has a 2000 GS400 with only about 35k miles on it. It is beautiful black/black, and off the line makes my Q whimper....at 80mph+ though, it is a different story.....
The 93 540i suffered from the Nikisil problem and had a 4.0 liter powerplant and is not the same as the replacement 4.4 liter. Never buy an E34 530i or 540i unless the engine was replaced, in some cases by BMW NA.Falkdesigns wrote:I beat my friends 93 540i. I've beat IS300's (first gen), I don't know, my Q is no slouch.
I had the opportunity to drive an IS300 when it was brand new for a year in 2001, and can say that I remember it being fast for what it was. It was no 3 Series, but nontheless, an admiral effort by Lexus.Falkdesigns wrote: I've beat IS300's (first gen), I don't know, my Q is no slouch.
I guess the US spec E34 540i was available as a 1994 -1995. We have different cars with different specs in Canada also.ScottJackson wrote:no such thing as '93 540i in the U.S. Also, the 4.4L engine had a little more torque, but same hp as the 4.0L the E34 was lighter than the E39 that the 4.4L came in. The 525i is about as quick as the 540i from right off the line, which is faster than the Q. Maybe it was a 540i with a 525 badge... prob not though. I know how it is with those earlier euro spec cars. My '79 euro 635csi fairly rips. With no help from the brakes on very sticky and coarse pavement, it'll spin both 255/45-17 tires all the way through 1st gear and chirp 2nd. It's also got the rather rare M90 block that came in the M1 racer and is good to over 800hp with some forced induction. A 540i of any year (assuming it has the alusil block) is a great performer with the 6 speed trans. Add a centrifugal blower kit to it, and it's a Viper beater. Check out Jimmy540i.com as he has a Dinan supercharged E39... with an automatic. Keep in mind, the E34 540i had the stronger 5HP30 auto trans than the 5HP24 found in the E39, so if you want the auto, the E34 would be better for modifications.
Current: 94 with 140K, Dk Blue, named Bluevaa, 94T 45K, Dk Green showroom except for some key marks in paint, named Greenveelino wrote:What Qs do you have?
Contact ProTorque about modifying your stock converter. You will have to do the install.crimsone wrote:hello, just wondering about the mod torque convert ? where can i get it and is that the price installed ?
Thanks
Earl
4 G50sPeterofdevon wrote:
Current: 94 with 140K, Dk Blue, named Bluevaa, 94T 45K, Dk Green showroom except for some key marks in paint, named Greenvee
Past: 93 Beige drove from 30K to 217K, 91 cream drove fron 10K to 90K
Peter
Guess you could say I like this carlino wrote:
4 G50s