Post by
Shad0wXCalibur »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/shad0wxcalibur-u95338.html
Wed Dec 23, 2009 9:00 pm
You know. The ones from Sylvania? Well I got chewed out for giving my experience to these bulbs probably a year ago. I wouldn't have minded that since my experience with them wasn't with a Versa yet. But I caught some for a good price of $20 for a twin pack. I would never pay the normal $50 for these though and here's why. I didn't notice a dramatic difference in the beam distance or how much brighter it made everything. It was whiter which looked cooler and made things look a little more crisp but that is where some people probably think that they are getting a lot more light. Small fact: coatings on bulbs actually decrease lumens. Something is filtered out to make that light whiter. The other thing is the lifespan. I bought two twin packs for the Versa and CR-V and the craziest thing happened. One of the bulbs in both vehicles blew out about a week apart from each other after about 6 months of using them. And no, I did not touch the glass. The claims on the package are true to an extent. If anyone's ever taken the time to read the asterick, it states the comparisons are next to an old worn out regular halogen bulb but not next to a brand new one which would be brighter.
So without being flamed, can I just safely ask what the hype around these is? Does anyone else notice this or has anyone truly had a better experience than this? And please do not post up company photos of light bulb comparisons like someone did in the year old thread. Duh, a company is gonna do everything to make their product look awesome
I am in need of more low beam light but I am going back to cheap regular bulbs and may buy some Hella Micro DEs to rig in the bumper one day. I put some on the CR-V and they made much more difference in low beam lighting than any bulb upgrade did.