sampsonJ wrote:Ok,
I simply asked the reason WHY people would claim that the VG is a better engine then the RB. Im not talking about hypothetical situations. Im talking about objective reason(s).
....
Why would you claim the VG is superior to the RB ? go.
GEZ.. you fail to recognize that a this thread is about a kid who wants to know if he can put a SKYLINE motor in his 300zx...and that is how I was trying to keep him, advised from despair and disappointment because of this youth and lack of knowlegde.
It would of been so much easier for you to make a new thread and then I would be able to answer you.
But your persisance...
I am not going to give you all you want but here's a start...
ROUND #1:
nsrZ32 can say all he wants. But in the end... rb26 is a straight 6...
this is the link...to explain why inline 6 is superior to v-6s..
<From link Begin>
As shown in the picture, straight-6 engine is simply two 3-cylinder engines mated symmetrically together, thus piston 1 is always in the same position as piston 6, piston 2 the same as piston 5 .... in other words, the engine is balanced end-to-end and requires no balancer shaft, unlike 3-cylinder engines. What about vertical / transverse forces? like 3-cylinder engines, the vertical and transverse forces generated by individual cylinders, no matter first order or second order, are completely balanced by one another. The resultant vibration is nearly zero, thus inline-6 is virtually a perfect configuration.
Inline-6 is not the only configuration can deliver near perfect refinement, but it is the most compact one among them. All boxer engines are perfectly balanced, but they are two wide and require duplicate of blocks, heads and valve gears. V12 engines also achieve perfect balance, but obviously out of the reach of most mass production cars. Automotive engineers knew that long ago, that’s why you can see most of the best classic engines were inline-6...
.. at the bottem of the link...
However, BMW is still loyal to inline-6 engines. Ultimately, inline-6 engine is more efficient yet smoother. V6 has more energy loss because it duplicates valve gears and camshafts (which increase frictional loss), while the use of 2 cylinder banks leads to more heat loss...
<From link End>
What does that mean... the VG has to work harder to get the same horsepower...to me thats sounds like a PITA..
So makes you wonder why people say 2JZ or RB26 > VG30... just a simple ECU tune one each of these engine... the straight 6s with yeild you the most performance than the more ineffecient energy burning V-6...
Further...How many vg you see that are drag queens... how about 2jz...or rb26...
END OF ROUND #1
Modified by Rare_f8 at 2:44 PM 5/9/2008