Post by
Second Shadow »
https://forums.nicoclub.com/second-shadow-u4629.html
Tue May 11, 2010 7:32 am
The answer would be no, DOHC is better. but unless you're taking it really far (this is just IMO) it doesn't make a whole lot of difference in the KA series engines.
you see the biggest advantage of DOHC is more valves, allowing the engine to breath better at high RPM. there just isn't a lot of time for the valves to be open to allow air to flow. thats why higher lift/longer duration cams help at high RPM, and why having more valves and thus a larger channel for air to flow through helps as well. however, the KA has a really long stroke, and just doesn't run well at high RPM anyway. it gets the job done at low RPM(really well I might add), with lots of torque, when the valves aren't opening and closing too fast to let it breath.
most of the power gains from the later model DOHC KAs are actually from a higher compression ratio, not the valves anyway. which means the higher compression DOHC is actually "less" suitable for turbo in stock form(it's 9.5 to 1 in some cases!). thing is, neither engine has pistons up to any kind of serious boost, so you have to change them out to run more than a few PSI, and then you would just get proper compression pistons for turbo on either engine. So for this special case, I'd say neither has an advantage.