There will be no such thing as an easy engine swap on a Versa. The MR18DE is a new style engine, completely different configuration than previous engines, and as mentioned the only other engine that MAY fit the existing transmission MIGHT be the new MR20DE in the '07 Sentra.RBKhockey13 wrote:I did some more research on it, and i wanted to know what you gys think of a swap with a 2002 Acura RSX type-s? Would i need a new transmission or would it just bolt on?
In the post he said that the driver was trying to shift into 3rd, but "accidentally" rammed the shifter into 1st and proceeded to dump hte clutch. Most normal driver would have noticed that the RPM's were going to high and pushed the clutch back in before allowing the engine to to try to peg the tachometer and let he engine spin past 10,000RPM. (redline in 1st is about 30mph... that means 55 is about 11,0000 RPM).c5neb wrote:On their claim of abuse, they would have to prove that going into third gear at 55-60 is "abuse". The owner's manual on page 5-16 indicates that the top speed for third gear is 74 mph. Modified by c5neb at 8:52 AM 12/2/2006
However every modern manual transmission has an interlock device that is supposed to make it physically impossible to put the car in 1st gear at speeds over 20 mph (less, in the case of the Versa). If the car DID go into 1st at freeway speeds, there was clearly a failure of this device.motoguy128 wrote:
In the post he said that the driver was trying to shift into 3rd, but "accidentally" rammed the shifter into 1st and proceeded to dump hte clutch. Most normal driver would have noticed that the RPM's were going to high and pushed the clutch back in before allowing the engine to to try to peg the tachometer and let he engine spin past 10,000RPM. (redline in 1st is about 30mph... that means 55 is about 11,0000 RPM).
This is just my opinion from year of riding motorcycles. You always slip the clutch a little during downshifts incase you get the wrong gear and ot match revs more smoothly.
i agree, i was slowing down from 60mph, and i tried to jam the stick into first, and it wouldnt let me put it into first. so in order to get into first, i would either have to for and JAM the stick in, or the transmission lock was faulty. i would go with the transmission lock, unless you broke it.Ever Victorious wrote:However every modern manual transmission has an interlock device that is supposed to make it physically impossible to put the car in 1st gear at speeds over 20 mph (less, in the case of the Versa). If the car DID go into 1st at freeway speeds, there was clearly a failure of this device.
In order for them to prove that "you broke it by abuse", They would actually have to dismantle the transmission and show you the abused parts that "snapped". They cannot make the "abuse" determination by looking at the car. From what I have heard, dealers will use the "abuse" line regularly if you have after-market parts and have given number of people just accept it and walk away. The result is they save money....my two cents!MIdnkight-lude wrote:
i agree, i was slowing down from 60mph, and i tried to jam the stick into first, and it wouldnt let me put it into first. so in order to get into first, i would either have to for and JAM the stick in, or the transmission lock was faulty. i would go with the transmission lock, unless you broke it.
this is very much true. :p i actually sale car parts, and i know which warrenty i would void with parts. haha but they would have to prove it. but if they did prove it, your at *** load of money, because they would charge you for the laber of removing and dismatling the transmission. >_<c5neb wrote:In order for them to prove that "you broke it by abuse", They would actually have to dismantle the transmission and show you the abused parts that "snapped". They cannot make the "abuse" determination by looking at the car. From what I have heard, dealers will use the "abuse" line regularly if you have after-market parts and have given number of people just accept it and walk away. The result is they save money....my two cents!
The MR20DE is actually the same block as the MR18DE, just bored out a little more, so it should fit with your transmission and actually fit into the engine bay. However, why not just wait for the 2.5 VSpec engine haha.Ever Victorious wrote:There will be no such thing as an easy engine swap on a Versa. The MR18DE is a new style engine, completely different configuration than previous engines, and as mentioned the only other engine that MAY fit the existing transmission MIGHT be the new MR20DE in the '07 Sentra.
Now... to reiterate a couple points...
NO ENGINE FROM A CAR BUILT PRIOR TO 2007 WILL BE LEGAL FOR A SWAP! This is a common law in basically EVERY jurisdiction in the US, including areas that do not have Emissions laws. The first time you go to ANY inspection (safety, emissions, etc.) your car will fail, and you will not be able to reregister it.
NO NON-MR SERIES OR OTHER MANUFACTURER ENGINE WILL FIT THE MR SERIES TRANSMISSION WITHOUT SERIOUS MODIFICATION... furthermore, a higher power engine will require the burlier transmission from whatever car the engine came from.
And now a couple points that have not been stated yet...
DO NOT ATTEMPT TO USE YOUR EXISTING TRANSMISSION FOR A SWAP! You have a failed 1st gear interlock! This problem will STILL exist after an engine swap!
A PROPER ENGINE SWAP OF A FOREIGN TYPE (Non-MR series) WILL COST IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD OF 10 GRAND... it's not just the engine. It is the custom driveline parts, custom mounts, ECU, wiring, sensors, any other custom fitting that would need to occur...
CHEAP engine swaps only exist in the realm of closely compatible cars. There is only ONE car on that list, when compared to the versa: '07 Sentra.
As painful as $6k for a new engine sounds, it is more than likely your least expensive option.
Now... I will also say "hire a lawyer" because it does not matter what you did to the car... if THEIR transmission gear interlock device failed and made it POSSIBLE for you to put it in 1st gear at 55 mph, that is THEIR fault. The failure was caused by THEIR faulty OEM equipment.