AZhitman wrote:Yes, Obama - We're all ignorant...
Yup, and we cling to our low tire pressure out of bitterness, etc. (I know, I know - just couldn't resist.)
For decades, when I've heard people complain about energy prices, or scarcity, etc., I've brought up conservation - kind of a pet peeve of mine. It's pathetic, really. We still build houses with 4 inch walls - never any additional insulation. Our homes get bigger and bigger, with no particular architectural design for energy efficiency. The SUV was created to avoid the CAFE standards, since they're light trucks not cars, and everyone snaps 'em up in droves, getting lousy gas mileage. Most people still buy regular ol' incadescent bulbs. Pitiful.
All the while, our situation gets worse and everyone looks for someone to point the finger at. We're the problem, not anyone else. When we finally think we're wasting too much energy, we'll adjust. We're doing it right now. US oil consumption was down 3% in the first half of 2008.
WASHINGTON – U.S. oil demand was significantly down for the first six months of 2008, API said today in its Monthly Statistical Report. While U.S. refiners churned out record and near-record amounts of oil products, imports – especially product imports -- fell substantially. Deliveries of all oil products – a measure of demand – fell 3.0 percent compared with the same first-half-year period in 2007, with gasoline deliveries slipping 1.7 percent. For the preceding three years, oil demand had essentially held steady.
API statistics manager Ron Planting said, “At 20.08 million barrels per day, total demand was the lowest in five years.
http://www.futurepundit.com/archives/005376.html
No big government plan, no energy subsidies.
So, good for Obama for mentioning conservation. But ... um ... that's not what is being debated. We're debating nuclear energy and offshore drilling. Obama is still figuring out just exactly what he wants - was against offshore drilling, now for it, but only if it's part of a "comprehensive" plan, whatever that is - he'll figure it out for us, I'm sure.
"My interest is in making sure we've got the kind of comprehensive energy policy that can bring down gas prices," Obama told The Palm Beach Post in Florida on Friday.
"If, in order to get that passed, we have to compromise in terms of a careful, well thought-out drilling strategy that was carefully circumscribed to avoid significant environmental damage -- I don't want to be so rigid that we can't get something done."
After long deriding calls for more drilling from President George W. Bush and other Republicans, the Illinois senator is signaling he has one eye on the polls as he calls for compromise.
"Senator Obama's campaign staff has clearly concluded the current 'no drilling, no bill' strategy is unsustainable and damaging to the senator's election prospects in November," wrote economist John Kemp of the commodities firm RBS Sempra.
http://www.reuters.com/article...80803
"My interest is in making sure we've got the kind of comprehensive energy policy that can bring down gas prices," ... heheh, yeah, just gotta love that language.
So, bravo to Obama for pointing out the obvious about conservation, but that's got nothing to do with whether the Federal government should promote ways to produce more energy, too. Windfall taxes sure ain't it, for instance.