Should I make another FAQ?

[Exar-Kun]

Hey guys, just wondering if I should compile some aerodynamics articles and make a FAQ about wings, ground effects, etc? or roll it into another sticky?

-chetShould I make an Aero FAQ?

[Exar-Kun]

*bump*

[offtheline]

Im all for it. Knowledge is meant to be shared.

[PalmerWMD]

The more FAQ's the better.

Fred...

[SmithSR]

I agree with Fred. The more information that is readily available, the better. Maybe updated FAQ pages, simply seperated into.. "Wheel FAQ" "Tire FAQ" "Suspension FAQ"

...aw hell, upon further consideration, the links are good, and full of useful info. Keep up the good work, Chet!

Phil

[AZhitman]

Go get 'em, tiger!

[Exar-Kun]

<-glutton for FAQ writings

alright, I'll make one up in the next week...

I may separate those out phil, we'll see...

I gotta lcean them up anyway -chet

[Def]

Just wondering what exactly are you going to be focusing on. I've gotten some experience with aerodynamics before, and it seems most people miss alot of "big points" of the application of aero to passenger cars. There is much more to downforce than deflection, and things that you would think might increase drag(wings and such) can actually *decrease* it due to the effect to the stream not being localized.

[Exar-Kun]

IT will mostly focus on items like ground effect, spilers, air stream, how air flows, spoiler work, etc

mostly a crap load of links to sites explaining it far better than I can -chet